-
Posts
386 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Kappa
-
@PickleMonster Dude... Be good, I was just asking a question... Do I have to pay a pre-order to ask a question? Are you sure you're not the guy who need to chill out? It is not necessary to do SMM, it would be enough to write a short post to let people know that they are still there.
-
OK, no dates... BTW can you confirm PC guys are still working on the project? It is a lot we don't read news from theme, isn't it?
-
@RAZBAM_ELMO indeed.... Indeed it does not work properly even as an ILS. You can talk about gameplay and you can say that it would cost a lot in terms of manwork but the fact is that it does not work correctly as either ILS or AWLS. This should be a full fidelity module, but if think about it very carefully INDEED IT IS NOT.
-
Same issue here. AMD Radeon 5700
-
MOOSE - Mission Object Oriented Scripting Framework
Kappa replied to FlightControl's topic in Scripting Tips, Tricks & Issues
Hi @fargo007 , hope this can be usefull: yourSet:ForEachGroup( function (group) if group:IsActive() then -- the group is already active - do something else group:HandleEvent(EVENTS.Birth) function group:OnEventBirth(EventData) -- do something when group will be activated end end end ) -
Yeh... This happens when you move a waypoint using TDC, right?
-
reported [NEED HELP FROM ED] Spawn a FARP using LUA
Kappa replied to davidp57's topic in Mission Editor
I can confirm, in 2.7 FARPS are still not synced in MP. If spawned, only server host will see theme -
As CL says: MP. A client's game will crash if they try to open the F10 map after a markup or shape object has been added via the scripting engine - fixed. In deeds clients does not crash anymore and shapes are created correctly using trigger.action.arrowToAll() and trigger.action.circleToAll() The only proble seems to be that arrows are bounded to the view and if you scroll the map after creating an arrow it will move from its position following the view. This does not happens with circles.
-
Looking forward to try it! Still downloading the update...
-
Point 2 isn't a new bug
-
Ok but this does not explain why you are using ILS as an AWLS
-
OH-58D Kiowa Warrior November News
Kappa replied to Polychop Simulations's topic in DCS: OH-58 Kiowa
Hey @Polychop Simulations what about an official update on the Kiowa? Don't wanna make you hurry, just keep in touch! -
How do you know?
-
yes please, it is annoying and sloppy
-
You better search the forum before posting
-
@Fri13 I see your point and I have to admit that Razbam have a strange way of doing things... However, it must also be admitted that in recent times things have changed in bettere (much better), so I wanted Elmo to tell us what they plan to do about this...
-
I have never understood why they scatter information instead of gathering theme in one place ...
-
Thanks for your detailed reply @Ramsay I really appreciate. My personal opinion on this is that since DCS AV-8B is a full fidelity module using AWLS as an ILS is not only technically wrong but also ethically wrong. If you want to make an exception to the rule, it would be better to add the AWLS to the Tarawa even if IRL it does not have the AWLS rather than using the ILS on the Harrier... @RAZBAM_ELMO what is Razbam's position on this?
-
Hello everyone, I write here on the forum because I have not yet understood what Razbam will do about the Harriers AWLS ... AFAIK, AWLS is a precision landing system typically used on naval units, like ICLS but it is not the same thing (dunno what is the difference). AWLS is therefore not compatible with either ICLS or ILS, but in DCS Core, AWLS system is not modeled. My question is: why does the Harrier AWLS currently behave like an ILS? ILS frequencies are hard coded into a lua file in order to convert the frequencies into channels and make this system work even where it shouldn't work... I wonder, wouldn't it be better to make AWLS work like an ICLS, which is already modeled in DCS, rather than make it work like ILS?
-
Unfortunately I have to agree... I hope razbam will do something about this ... Anyway the thing that pisses me off is that the module has been out for 3 years and we are still at these levels ...
-
Get a Track IR or something dude! ;)
-
We have all seen and appreciated Razbam's new attitude towards Harrier and the community, at this point it is clear that there is some kind of planning behind the latest updates. I would like to kindly ask our friendly community manager @RAZBAM_ELMO if you can share your roadmap with us. Thanks
-
- 2
-