amazingme

Then why is not the same on the Spit or K-4? The Ctrl+Enter is there to show us the user input, as far as I know.

Nope..

More like in the graphs.. -2.8% ;)

The rudder is offset to the right when NO pressure is applied to it (rudder assistance is OFF). I've attached a screenshot where it's clearly visible. The same issue happens with the Anton.

The rudder is offset to the right when NO pressure is applied to it (rudder assistance is OFF). I've attached a screenshot where it's clearly visible. The same issue happens with the Dora.

Dora has the same issue, btw.. Loses engine in climbing. Sent from my Redmi 5 using Tapatalk

I couldn't pass the 525kph barrier (1.41 ATA).. which is very slow for the A-8 anyway.

At high AoA the cooling will suffer.. If you push it too hard then you need to watch the temps.

Together with the loss of power.. Again, the guy(s) that changed the code didn't test it AT ALL? It's beyond me understanding..

Of course, MW is much more efficient than water injection only..

Please provide a full video with combat maneuvers (against AI will do), because on my side, the engine quits frequently..

Thanks!

The cockpit is shaking constantly as soon as you apply power to the engine. I hope this will NOT be a feature as it's inducing nausea.

Well, I've tried adding the 109 in Server.lua but it seems that it won't work anymore. Probably it's now hardcoded as SnapViews won't allow to change the FOV. So, most likely, the mod won't work either.. But this should be a trivial thing to do.. I don't know why it's not found in the Options yet..

Never heard of..

FYI.. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111019/

Statistically speaking, the "confidence" interval MUST be bellow 0.5% or even 0.05% according to the newest tendencies in the field. 2.8% is too HIGH to yield statistically coherent results. It would be very interesting to know what input data you used in CFD modelling and what were the results..

I doubt ED will ever do that.. MicroProse is already working on it..

Of course, just calculate the PWR for both in different configurations..

They don't understand how the laws of physics work either.. but that's a different story. Sent from my Redmi 5 using Tapatalk

My money is on Snapage.. :) Sent from my Redmi 5 using Tapatalk

You should be banned from this forum with these ad hominem.

Another point that you're missing here is that the K-4 with MW-50 will fly differently than the G-6 or another K-4 w/o it. I want to fly the K-4 as it WAS, not a handicapped one. This is Digital COMBAT Simulator, not Digital MAP Simulator.. just sayin'..

Without MW-50 you will lose 2 important things.. acceleration and climbing advantage, in other words the soughtful ENERGY. You'll lose the whole point of the 109 K-4. Try some dogfights, PvP, one with MW and one without, do it like 100 times and see who will always win the battle. Sent from my Redmi 5 using Tapatalk

That is a correct assumption. :thumbup: