Czar

I was almost freaking out just now. All my modules or almost all including the hornet and Persian gulf are giving the "not authorized to be used with your account" error at the DCS launch. Now I cannot use any of my several modules of DCS even offline. What the hell is going on? Edit: It was probably a server issue that it seems to be back up now. That was a heart pounding one...

Okay. First things first, my fresh A-10C install default POV is fine (img attatched). The snapviews.lua file you need to delete should be the one in saved games folder and not the one in DCS root folder, if the issue is a result of an unwanted default view save. You can also edit the snapviews.lua file under the default view lines separately using a text editor. Furthermore, I'd recommend a repair scan on your dcs. If something on the root folder is changed it should default back in. Also delete again your snapviews.lua file under your saved games folder. This is my default view on the A-10C. If these numbers are off from your file. copying these would be a fix method. [13] = {--default view viewAngle = 75.000000,--FOV hAngle = 0.000000, vAngle = -23.000000, x_trans = 0.360000, y_trans = -0.041337, z_trans = 0.000000, rollAngle = 0.000000, }, [14] = {--default view - VR viewAngle = 75.000000,--FOV hAngle = 0.000000, vAngle = -23.000000, x_trans = 0.126000, y_trans = 0.036000, z_trans = 0.000000, rollAngle = 0.000000, Cheers

No problem. Once a view point is saved it becomes the default until you delete the saved view file under your documents OR apply a different POV with Ralt+Num0. You won't need to re apply every mission. This is interesting, I'm firing up my dcs a10c to have a look.

Hello. You can edit in your preffered starting point of view by pressing RAlt + Num0 at setting you want as default. Move your pilot head with either trackir (as seen that you dont use it), mouse or keyboard and then press RAlt+Num0 where you feel confortable. There are tons of keybinds that you can use to move your POV in the 3 main axes. I hope it helps. As in why your default looks like that. Probably an accidental view save and you are deleting the wrong file. If thats the case, either way is remedied by re editing your default view by how I explained. Cheers. Good flights

With the support of those who commented before of course, watch the link Will posted. Nitty and gritty, this is how I do: flaps half, gear and hook down before any trimming attempt. Keeping in mind that when the hornet turns, the nose sinks so when leveling out again it will be all different in trimming, so keep half the action on the stick at least. When you're feeling good and before 3nm DME, full flaps and trim her. Don't chase the speed vector with trim, you do that with power. What you trim is where your nose is pointed at which needs to be above the horizon obviously. I bet you know many of this and what I wrote may make more sense in my head than written down. Cheers and have good sorties.

Highly limited scope and certainly not the cup of tea for many of us. His opinion stands 100%.

Looks like it's user end. Is Persicus the Persian Gulf map? I currently have the Persian Gulf installed and it is all fine. Have a go on repairing your dcs installation. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=114030. I haven't installed NTTR yet on my machine after my previous DCS reinstallation so I can't comment on that.

I didn't think it was something for a bug report but interesting just enough to post it here. Beware on those 2x magnum even with a generous interval. PS: gfycat link. I don't know how to wrap it in this forum. https://giant.gfycat.com/JointAlarmingHochstettersfrog.webm

:pilotfly:

:smilewink:

Any official word on this subject? The phenomenon is also present in the F/A-18C module and the Mirage 2000. The "bumps" are present over whole G values as -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 and so on. Affects either positive and negative Gs exactly as described by OP. Switching off camera movement by G forces in the cockpit is not a solution as the issue seems to be on the flight dynamics itself and you can feel it with whatever setting you are on. I got paranoid it was something to do with my joystick a few weeks ago, but it turned out it was this bizarre issue.

It sounds like you're in the correct path but not with enough flight time on the bird. Give yourself more time to get used to it. It is a "interesting" plane to fly in terms of controls but it is not a hard bird to tame overall. I'd bet 80% of your problems are due to that. Use the curves.

DCS like all other true sims, is 1:1 to reality. 400kts is 400kts, 130kts is 130kts. 1 fight hour is 1 flight hour. 1 flight second is 1 flight second. Increasing the field of view does not accelerate the simulation nor your plane, neither interferes with joysticks inputs and outputs.

Well written. In other hand some of us wouldn't trade a thing from the bird performance like you described and it's very well documented. It's limitations and features combo is what actually draws me into it. For my taste it's the perfect bird for a simulator MP&SP. I wouldn't even change it from a C to other variant. Good idea to post this. It's true a lot of people tend to blend the most iconic jets in the same category very often. Someone's taste might be more fit into a MiG 29 or the F-15 and unaware that the F/A-18C is a completely different kind of a deal.

Good stuff! Thank you.

I've never liked any gyro either. Good old school lead shooting.

Same here. Version: 2.1.1.6837

@Alwandy *shivers* edit: that's not really the finest look out there on realistic canopy. If something like this is implemented, may as well one glue his face to the radar screen and be instrument dependent. DCS: IFR lol Something like gpu dependent water dynamic water drops on the glass would be ED way to go in the future with the current methods of processing and post processing they are currently pushing out. Battlefield 3 is almost a dinosaur when it comes to texture/post processing relationship if you think about it.

"Market profit is Terrain but not Jets" Any empirical data to back that up? I'd say DCS has too few jet aircraft going for and it's growth on aircraft work is only giving breaths of fresh air, not the contrary. NTTR + Caucasus and not even bothered about spending a week on a 10year old map that is Caucasus with a new AC. Every new map released it's a bonus and not a ticket out of boredom land.

What's the preload setting you are using? I have a 1060 GTX 6gb Vram and preload radius makes a huge impact on VRAM usage. I don't have Normandy yet. How would you compare the map performance VS NTTR (which I have)? Depending on the results, I might jump for the Viggen instead of buying Normandy right away. These amounts of Vram usage now worries me a lot. Saturating 6gb is insane for that kind of map.

Not even close to that completion ratio. They are totally different in avionics. High probability of even having to make the whole 3D from scratch let alone the systems.