RoflSeal

Against, AI... Human in F-86 can down an AI F-15 in guns only fight.

Pretty sure when reinstalling a module, you don't use an activation, provided the system is the same.

Well, that is the mission designers fault. Every free flight server I have been on, I cannot mount anything on the hardpoints except smoke pods.

Not F/A-18, but in this case F-15, which is even better since they share the same engines Manufacturing and design of engines nowadays is so rock solid that doubling of human error in maintenance has a bigger impact on engine failure then the engine malfunction due to a part failing

Obviously you are pulling too hard on the stick. Set curves in Axis tune

It is hard to lock anything with R-3R when it isn't above you.

Yeah, lets stop development of DCS after the F/A-18C is released. Everything can be done by the Hornet, there is no point in adding anything else /s

Biggest problem those games had is that their "realistic/simulator game modes" had tanks in a vacuum (except with maybe planes). At the end of the day, the purpose of the tank is to support infantry, whether directly or indirectly. In these games, there is no infantry to fight or support.

F-16 has not been done once in a modern sim (and no, BMS is not in any way modern)

Options>Special>FC3>Default

YOU SHOULD BE SHOT AT DAWN FOR DISGRACING GREAT LEADER'S AIRFORCE! [ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHo7bqp3_Xw[/ame]

It makes your screen looks as though you smeared Vaseline all over it.

Iranians claim a number of kills with the Phoenix.

Pretty sure a AJ37 Viggen got a maneuver kill on a soviet jet

Pretty sure the FG-1 was to do with who manufactured it (Goodyear in this case rather then Vought), not whether it was for the marines or not. Corsairs made by Brewster were designated F3A

And also its gotta a very wide body compared to its wings, in the A-10 its the reverse.

I did the bottom right one and I came up at 30,000ft at a weight of 31,921lbs (18% fuel, 0% cannon,chaff and flare) so I guess that is close enough for any flying errors since I'm not the best pilot, you basically have 500lbs of fuel left after the immelman. The aircraft had to be of been modified to strip weight of in exchange for fuel.

Just used the A-10A on a server before my internet crapped up and got disconnected and the autopilot worked

I don't see how anecdotal thinking like that is in favour of the Hornets. Computer power is increasing year on year. I don't see a problem in taking advantage of it. The "flying computer" will give the pilot much better situational awareness for example.

I don't see in any way possible how F-104 can counter the MiG-21bis. F-104 were retired by US before the MiG-21bis even flew.

Having a pure bomber would be nice.

I would love the howl of the F-104 modelled. [ame] [/ame]

I honestly wouldn't mind loosing the MiG-29A, especially since it is something maneuverable, and is a fighter(unlike the Su-25T) and can blow stuff up (unlike the TF-51D), so it could be a good enticer for new users.

But the radar is important. You can lock onto targets much easier to get a radar guided gun pipper on the M2000. With the MiG its much harder

ASUS Strixx Nvidia GTX780