-
Posts
573 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Swordsman422
-
Grey's Anatomy? That's terrible. I divorce-level hate that show. If Seattle Grace were a real hospital and I was mortally shot in the entryway to the ER, I'd insist on being taken somewhere else. What toxic dump of a workplace with immature, self-centered, horrible people. I'd no-kidding die of plot, and if not, I'd strangle myself with my own IV line just so I wouldn't have to hear any more inane squabbling over the latest bout of bedroom round robin. Heatblur, get this man a Tomcat!
-
I think it's probably for the F-4. I think the F-14 had weapon separation issues with the -7E and mainly used the -7F and later. http://www.ejectionsite.com/F-14%20SHOOTDOWN.pdf
-
Gunslinger, that VF-103 livery should be one of the option for the F-14B 1994 campaign in this module. What an elegant and simple scheme.
-
Really? The Heatblur skins look kinda clean to me.
-
I would agree with names specifically. Though unlike the USAF, USN aviators rarely flew the aircraft with their own name on it. The crew to fly was assigned whatever "up" jet was available regardless of what the canopy rail said. But it would still make for an interesting mechanic. But only names. While Navy jets have a history of being fairly colorful, it's enormously uncommon to see personalized nose art applied to an aircraft, to the point where you may as well just skin edit.
-
I've seen pictures of F-14s with TERs on the forward pylons, but if these are ever loaded with anything, it's BDU-33 training bombs. I've never seen the TERs loaded with GBUs. An F-14 can't even ferry that many.
-
The different F-14 models had different capacities due to bring back weight restrictions. The F-14As could and often did carry 4 GBU-12s, but the heavier F-14B/Ds were normally not in quad-bomber configuration. They did occasionally carry 3, but not 4. Usually only 2 GBU-16s. If you are wondering entirely about the theoretical vs. operational carriage, F-14s only had 4 hardpoints for bombs and there were size restrictions. Carrying 4 GBU-12s or -16s would be okay, but you start getting into larger sizes and it becomes more difficult to fit 4 weapons in the tunnel. The jets could only carry a pair of GBU-24s and they had to be staggered with one on the port side forward station and the other on the starboard side aft.
-
What do you do first when the tomcat is available?
Swordsman422 replied to Mking's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Definitely map my keys. After that, any initial training scenarios required to get started up and flying, then I'll insert the F-14 into my free flight scenario and just get used to the jet for a while. -
I'm most looking forward to VF-142, VF-143, and VF-102 liveries. I also will have plenty of room for pre-1996 VF-103. Gonne be a good time.
-
At the very least VF-1 and VF-2 from 1989, VF-74 and VF-103 (still the Sluggers, thank goodness) from 1994, VF-102 from around 1996 and VF-103 from around 2003, based on the artwork we've seen so far and campaign information. But I am certain we'll get far more than that.
-
Considering forming an F-14 Squadron if there is any interest
Swordsman422 replied to punk's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Hey, Punk, as a reference to your handle here, why don't you borrow a fictional squadron name from Ward Carroll and use VF-104, the Arrowslingers? -
Yeah, some USN, USMC, Canadian, etc unit callsigns would be good. Also, the US units when using squadron callsigns also use the modex number of their aircraft, so instead of "Hobo 1-1" it would be, say "Hobo 405" or whichever jet was being flown. Be nice to see this implemented also.
-
F-14 May Development Update -- Campaigns & Content!
Swordsman422 replied to Cobra847's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Does the F-14B campaign remind anyone of the WWIII mockumentary? -
My 2nd favorite Tomcat squadron is VF-213. I love their two CVW-8 liveries. So if a D happens, then yes, absolutely I'd get it. The B is still my favorite model. VF-143, VF-11, and VF-32 take up three of the 5 top slots on my favorite squadrons list. VF-142 and VF-102 are just gravy. I'm most excited about this one in the release line-up. The A? I like it. VF-41 is the most accomplished Tomcat squadron pretty much ever. Their combat record is proven. If the F-14 did just about anything combat-related, the Black Aces did it first. VF-211, VF-14, and VF-154 also ended their days in the A-model, and I love them also. My point I guess is, we're getting a Tomcat for DCS, which is awesome. An F-14D would just complete the family, but if we never get it I won't be able to cry much.
-
All F-14s in US museums either had their engines removed or starved of fuel to destroy them. No museum Tomcat will ever fire up again.
-
This thread is making me wonder how the OLS is going to function. Will it only exist on the carrier model deck edge or will there be a convenient pop-up overlay like what we got with Jane's F/A-18? The pop-up isn't terribly realistic, but it will probably make it easier to decipher an object that is only going to be a few pixels high at the ball call.
-
The F-16-30/32 uses the F110-GE-100. The F-14B/D used the F110-GE-400. The -400 is different only in the 50-inch tail pipe extension fitted downstream the augmenter to better fit the F-14 airframe. What affect this as well as intake geometry would have on sound at the "suck" and "blow" ends of the engine I'm not sure.
-
That's not the only external difference. The F-14D lacked the ALQ fairings by the main gear doors also. The RIO's boarding step reinforcement plate was also not universal on the F-14D like it was the B. Also, while they were in the cockpit, the ejection seats were quite visible from the outside. The F-14B's GRU-7A and the F-14D's SJU-17 are very different.
-
*Puts on comically serious guy face* I actually prefer the F-14B. Never did like the twin chin pod aesthetically.
-
Think again. Lol. https://www.f-117a.com/texas.html
-
Airfield? Like, on the land? Where the zoomies fly out of? Ha! Whatever CATOBAR carrier is available. And probably blasting some Moondragon while I'm at it. Maybe this track.
-
Just for fun, future aircraft module wishlist
Swordsman422 replied to FlankerMan's topic in DCS Core Wish List
Some Vietnam-era and late Cold War US Navy stuff. A Vietnam module with maybe FC3 complexity could include theF-8C/D/E/H/J/K, A-4C/E/F, and A-7A/B/C. Add in an AI RIO/BN and we could have F-4B/J and A-6A/B. Late CW F-4N/S, A-6E/(TRAM), and A-7E. Most likely to happen, though, and I won't protest, is the F-16, probably the C-40 and C-52 models. It's too popular an airplane and would get tons of European and Mediterranean users, as well as possibly steal some players from that other sim. -
Could and did, but when in the FAC(A) role, F-14s designated targets with lasers as opposed to smoke rockets.
-
I moved to standalone just to be able to prepurchase this module. Moved my other modules over easily enough with no extra cost. The whole procedure was painless, and I highly recommend it.
-
This is true. Five of VF-154's twelve F-14As were detattched to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, working closely with USAF, RAF, and RAAF assets to provide close air support for special operations forces. The F-14s primarily functioned in the FAC-A role, buddy lasing or quarterbacking CAS assets during engagements.