Jonne

My guess would be, that they stay inop in most fighters too. I mean you do not really need them for flying anyway. In case of airliners, you have them on multiple busses and at least the older units would fall back to battery if power was lost. IIRC there is even an audible alarm on the ground if the INS would be powered by battery, so that they dont drain them.

In airliners, they stay inop. Thats why you have multiple.

Finally someone.

Achja, der Mist existiert noch. Wenn du realistisch fliegen willst, schalte das D2M ab. Die Variante der Mirage in DCS hatte dieses System nicht installiert.

What you mean is updating or correcting INS while in flight. Shutting it down and aligning again is simply not possible, as you have lost all reference. The carrier alignment is a different case, as the aircraft is continously fed with the ships very own INS and is basically slaved to it.

Man kann sich schon noch eine ganze Menge bewegen und trotzdem den Lock halten. Schau da am besten mal bei YouTube nach brauchbaren BVR Tutorials. Lass dir aber gesagt sein, wenn du in einer Situation bist, eine Mirage gegen zwei MiG-29, ist eh schon viel falsch gelaufen. So etwas geht man dann besser aus dem weg.

They corrected their INS with the help of a sextant. That is a complete different story. What the OP was trying, was to start the alignment process in the air, which would generate a huge mess, but nothing useful for navigation.

Habe bisher keine Termine im Februar.

You simply cannot realign an INS in a moving aircraft by its very own nature, no matter on what aircraft.

Selbst gegen R-27 hat die Mirage einfach keine Chance, solange man keine groben Schnitzer beim Gegner voraussetzt. Da fehlt einfach Reichweite.

Siehe oben (Februar ;) )

Which is exactly one country. And even that is only for traffic awarness, hence the plane would not just fall out of the sky when GPS is gone.

Es ist halt, so blöd das klingt, einfach das schlechtere Flugzeug.

Directly no. Indirectly, it does. The AP may be coupled to the FMC which gets it position from INS updated by GPS and VOR/DME. However data is crosschecked. An unreliable GPS signal would be disregarded with a possible fallback to pure INS, so worst that GPS spoofing could achieve, is degraded navigation performance. But after T/O INS should be pretty spot on anyway.

Keine brauchbare, aber wenn es nicht viele sind, würde glaube ich der Thread schon fast reichen.

AP does not rely on GPS for altitude.

Nur so als Anhaltspunkt, da ich vor ca 6 Monaten vor der gleichen Frage Stand, hier meine Grobe Auswahl: Aktueller i5 (mehr Kerne hilft nichts) RTX2070 32GB Ram Und weil ich blöd bin eine 500GB SSD, die wurde inzwischen nochmal um eine mit 1TB erweitert.

Is there a current clean canopy mod, that works with the updated radar screen and passes IC?

Oh, that opening post was about the SD-10?! Reading through it multiple times, I was rather sure it was about a Hornet and JF-17 RWR comparison. But it generally is hard to read anyway. A bit more on topic, there seems to be a lot wrong with Fox 3 RWR in MP currently.

Its seems its not the RWR of the JF-17, as that happens with other aircraft and the AIM-54, too. The F-14 does not even produce a track warning most of the time.

Irgendwie sehe ich den Sinn eines regional gebundenen TS oder Discord nicht so ganz. Immerhin ist es eine schöne Komponente des Internets, (fast) die ganze Welt zu verbinden. ;) Natürlich mal abgesehen von Sprachbarrieren, aber da wäre auch ein deutscher TS oder Discord ausreichend. Für ein Treffen in Fleisch und Blut ist die regionale Komponente dann aber eben nicht egal und von daher finde ich so ein Treffen auch eine gute Idee.

What missiles are those? Can only think of the AIM-120 currently.

Does both the side and mission year play a role for the 430?

Missiles do not seem to react on jamming. The only thing you may achieve against those modules is braking the lock eventually when switching the jammer on or off.

It is way easier in DCS than that. As per a 3rd party developer, which unfortunately I cannot find any more, every aircraft has a jamming flag which is either on or off, nothing in between. That means every jammer has the same strength and every jammer is noise jamming only, without any directional limitations. Now it is up to the module itself, how it deals with a jamming aircraft. As noise jamming basically floods the range information with an own generated signal, result should be range information lost. In the MiG-21 and some other modules, this is represented by multiple contacts in a straight line from the target. This is also verified by the real MiG-21 manual. In that aircraft, you can engage a jamming filter, which will reduce the radar picture to one contact again, but displayed in the middle of the radar screen, hence still no range information. In the JF-17, it seems the lost range indication is displayed by a jumping target, which also seems a plausible reaction. In all teen series modules, except the F-15, this effect is not modeled, hence they have a huge advantage, as they still will see the correct range. To be honest, this is a total laziness and should not make it through QA, but that is not my decision. All in all DCS is very restricted when it comes to jamming. Other jamming modes are already 50 years old and older and by now disclosed. See THIS post by Hiromachi about the SPS-141 pod of the MiG-21.