Bouli306

You "sound" as someone knowledgeable...yet you aren't.

I think i said in my last post that you were right didn't I? But the DLZ only shows when there is an actual missile on the jet or when you simulate one being there (as far as i know this can't be done in DCS).

And you are absolutely right! TA in M tapes nowadays is shown under TD box. No DLZ because of no weapons left. You should see the F (FCR) distance to target..also in NAV. But also stpt number and distance.

Not in NAV master mode

First picture you are flying in NAV master mode.....second picture is in Missile override

Try to keep the Nav knob in off for at least 10 seconds before trying an alignment again.

Sure....

NVCD-ANVIS

Well your source is a fairly known book to me, only the MLU one. Said limits are hard limits LM does not want you to exceed. You say it is a engine limit i doubt that. Simply because the PW has the same limits. If it is engine related at all i think it would primarly be because of the F-16 intake. I understand that the Viper will not explode when you are flying 809kts or 2.06M. But what i do know is that FCF flights the pilot checks the FLCS dampening by giving small inputs on rudder and roll to see if the FLCS willl dampen the input. It might have something to do with that dampening effect when flying too fast. or it might have something to do with the LEF's that can not go up more than 2 degrees... I am just saying that myself and you do not know what should happen to a real Viper when flying too fast because it never regularly been testflown..un- and intentionally. Thing is that your opinion is just an opinion like mine. I am just saying you want ED to model something other than the jet is reacting at the moment to an overspeed while you have no clue other than your opnion. That is why i say to leave it till somebody tells and proofs how the Viper should react. Runway excursions: we know a few instances of that to model this in DCS. The Viper, engine or the combination of the two are not designed to go over the speedlimits so also not the FLCS...why should they. This is it for me..i'm out.

WING/TAIL: Turns on the red and green wingtip and inlet lights and white light at trailing edge of vertical tail bright Fuselage: Turns on the white floodlights at the base of the vertical tail bright FORM: Varies the white formation lights on top and bottom of fuselage

Although very benign (2-3 degrees) it pitches up on accell. Now it must be said that the accelerometer placement might have something to do with this.

Did you see where the trapped fuel was located by using the fuel quantity select knob?

Although I do not really agree with you...does it really matter?..you should not go past those limits...for all I care you could end up in the twilight zone... If you read the lines above those drawings you listed, it reads: Maximum operating airspeed is 800 knots from sea level to 30,000 feet MSL. Above 30,000 feet MSL, the AIRCRAFT is limited to 2.05 mach. The aircraft as in structure including engine. So do we really want ED to come up with the correct flight model/behavior when limits are exceeded? My answer: no

level flight...?

Auto laser is WIP. I think you can map the laser to any button or switch.

Forgot to close the Air Refuel door maybe?

True for the block 50 in 2007 however the RNLAF and probably other countries are flying with the NVCD (Night Vision Cueing Device) where the JHMCS symbology is shown in NVG vision.

No problems here

The limit of the jet is 800KIAS or 2.025 whichever is lower. So do not fly it out of this region or you can expect strange things..your flying yourself out of the flight envelope of the Viper.

Or set a way-/steerpoint on the center of the base

Instead of all calculations you could also glide with 7degrees AOA...which is best glide (rule of thumb)

The Block 50 in DCS does not have an EGI installed. If it was installed the GPS switch would be removed. Also the Alignment would take 4 minutes in stead off 8. This Viper has an INU with separate GPS. But i still think time should be GPS time.

I know for a fact that when Link-16 was implemented on the MLU and a certain M tape was introduced IDM got canceled. It i snot functional anymore. I do not know about this Block 50 but might be the same.

+1

Is shows: HUD: 095 / 155 FCR: 095 / 99 HSD: 095 / 99 Just like the others said normally in the fcr and hsd ranges above 99nm are blanked. Everything else is picture perfect.