probad

is this what you're talking about? because there's simply no way to guide two sarh missiles with a single antenna.

fact of the matter is you guys dont give a damn about anything dcs really stands for you dont even care about what aircraft it is you're flying you're all just in it for the looks

frod strikes again god bless

http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-detail-glovevane.htm if you care to learn about the f-14 start by reading everything on this site

from what ive seen the vertical fillet has a circular section while only the fin proper has an elliptical section. this may be an overcorrection as now the fillet seems to also be elliptical. i would not try to make rapid corrections based solely on community critique though

izmrud search radar is a pair of antennae set on one constantly rotating turntable as opposed to later mechanically sweeped planar arrays with only one antenna that wags back and forth.

you're actively trying to be obtuse now please stop

also your recounting of the 1958 taiwan strait incident was in error, f-86s engaged j-5s (mig-17). j-6 did not make its first flight until 1959.

araks is correct, rest of you are just in denial only rationalization you need is that this wont actually affect performance in game if it gets fixed, good, if it doesnt, you will simply live with it, end of story.

yeah no this makes no sense burstfire mechanisms are pretty standard on russian aircraft cannons but it's not done with some "clip autoloader"

it can get memorable.

implying that all this time before they didnt care about the community? despite how many years of making one of the best consumer products on the market? truly some of you guys have a warped concept of what caring means. your focus on pr dog and pony shows are what allow sham products to plague the market

oh yeah sure just like the fabled rear facing radar in the su-34 right?

if you ever think you've come up with a fresh idea it just means you're ignorant

wow thanks for making plans for something they already have plans for!

acting passive aggressive about it wont find you more sycophants lmao fact of the matter is 1. you dont have a say in where the boat sails 2. the boat has sailed long ago welcome to reality, enjoy your stay.

why isnt anyone smart enough to equip every fighter with a gau-8 in a ball turret boom dogfighting solved

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=227363 hi op this is the thread you're looking for.

jesus christ the absolute state of the dcs community entering the year 2019

final countdown...

you guys will be punished even harder by real iff lmao

op is not the right target demographic

is this guy a low key linkbot or what

software doesnt work like things in real life, you can't just take something and move it and put it somewhere else. code is something that grows to be unique to its applications. actually there is one good irl analogy -- it would be like trying to transplant a shark liver into a human it just won't take. dcs wouldnt be able to make heads or tails of modules written for other engines. furthermore, trying to modify code to work rarely represents a time saver, oftentimes its a liability compared to writing new dedicated code from scratch.

the heater already sees you so your point is moot. you can either outpull it if its an old enough missile or you can outrange it if it was fired from far enough away. real answer is just dont be there in the first place. op's question is like "how do i not get wet if i jump into a pool naked".