it's probably last time I've ever bought anything from ED as EA. F-16 was quickly released to stabile just to "fight off" JF-17...which had more functionality and less bugs as F-16.
ok, that means that beta is actually development branch? At least, cOff, thank you for first official confirmation that baseline DCS changes dramatically with certain releases.
I wish they would allow us to install EA modules to stabile version from day they are released. Why must I keep two separate instalations? This was my original point. First JF-17 and now SC - I won't see them in stabile version for many more months. Beta version of DCS should not be prerequisite for installation of EA modules at release. EA is not for beta testing only. I want to be able to decide for myself if I want "unstabile" module in stabile version. Besides, more than half of the modules in stabile version now are EA in different stages...
their website was not renewed..they don't own the ugra-media.ru anymore, they don't say anything, they don't show anything and ED is keeping their mouth shut more or less. Strange, to say at least...
hi ED,
EA should be enabled by choice on stabile version too. I don't want to run two versions (stabile and OB), but when I pay for EA it should be availible on stabile too. For instance - I payed for JF-17 the minute it was possible to order and it still is not in sight on stabile version. I fear the same will be with Super Carrier....
This is very frustrating. EA should not bi bonded with OB only. Combine this with extra long process from EA to released version....not very nice situation.
havok2, thank your for this, ED should include it into DCS. As DCS "zoom lenses" insofar were producing incorrect result, I never used it. But now, you have opened possibilty for realistic virtual "photo-shoots" :)