Ignition

Youtubers may be using an older version so they may have removed the video to not generate confusions.

"VR" He's using VR and thats why the head is not centered because its recording from the right eye. There was no crosswind. The other part was just my opinion about the landings in general.

VR. We brake at the beginning of the runway, it helps when multiple aircraft are doing the overhead, the first aircraft makes almost a circle (depends on weight and wind). It's a much faster landing pattern (also at 200-220 kts on downwind) so multiple pakages can land in shorter time.

The BLU-97 still fly away. It's almost imposible to use. The AGM-154A goes to the point were it was designated correctly, the problem are the BLU-97 which the wind take them away from the target. The only way to use them is upwind or downwind which is crazy, the mission may prevent you from doing that. And imagine if you need to determine the wind 30nm away. Is the most unreliable weapon in DCS. With a friend we tried to use the meterstic and se the deviation and we tried to make a table, but its very hard to do so precisely so we didn't bother anymore.

In real life it updates much faster, 12 seconds is the worst update it can have. It depends on the ammount participants and works something like token ring.

It has an internal ECM.

In multiplayer, CPG created points and leave the server. Then joined again as CPG in the same aircraft and he had no points loaded. Also he couldn't see the 4 114-L but could see the 4 114-K.

The apache was made by ED. 100% of the revenue goes to ED which is not the case of 3rd party devs so they don't need to market their product outside of their own channels. If you want information of ED products you go to their channels, but a 3rd party may not have enough visitors so they prefer to give their preview product to well known content creators. You're right about the first part, it may be confusing for new people but not a big thing either. The preview copy of the youtubers it may be very very buggy and older version, watch the video of the razbam cold start for example and see how the engines work compared to any other youtube version. Youtubers will not complain of bugs since its a very nice opportunity for them to make lots of views, thats their goal. They don't care the aircraft isn't working fine yet since they only care of the views. Bugs are a big problem in early access release, is the worst thing you can do because the community doesn't forget them.

It should be very powerful but yeah I don't know how much compared to others.

You can always stop watching youtube videos.

You probably had some different speed that's why the boom didn't connect, you have to be stable without speed differences. Always the HUD on and showing fuel state

I don't see any problem. F-14B released 5 months after preorder at 70 dollars AH-64D released 5 months after preorder F-18C almost 5 months after preorder F-15E preorder feb 17/july 17 5 months

I would like to know how is the testing process for a new module, for example if they research how the avionics and aircraft should work? or if they request the information from the 3rd party or do they have their own SMEs.

Knowing the release is in july I will not watch any more youtube videos of the F-15E since I can take it more easily plus I don't like most of the DCS youtube creators. I would love to have the manual though, the manual is important for me while waiting for the release.

You can see the missile there when it starts emitting, the small diamond. You can see (and hear) the F-14 stt and AI red light and then you can see the probable position of the missile coming from the outside to the inside of the screen. At 4:49 SAM lights up en you can see the missile there

Razbam can show the aircraft in a controlled way with a few youtube people, if there's a bug a crash or wathever is not big deal this way and in the meantime they can fix these bugs before release. Try to take the best thing of each video even if its just graphics or audio, then read the manual then fly the aircraft. Don't make the situation bigger than it really is.

F-15C doesn't have UFC so all the radios need a panel to be operated.

Well, it's a pre order of the Early Access.

Impatient people should never preorder.

I can wait for the aircraft but I can't wait for the manual.

It should show in the TEWS, In which video? I need to see it.

With the F-15E around the corner its really sad ED still didn't add new static buildings for the mission editor and damage model.

We also want an integrated radio simulation and forget about external programs. We're looking forward to one day use this feature 100%.

I tested it and its working correctly at 15nm (F-16 and F-18), since when ED changed the range? This new range it's more accurate than the 8nm.

The laser ranges in DCS are fixed at about 8nm since a long time. Here's a video of a LANTIRN in real life receiving good reflection at 13.1nm (1:00:12) at the left upper corner you can read SLR (slant range) 13.6nm and at 13.1nm it changes at 79.000 ft which indicates the laser is receiving reflections.