sylkhan

Thanks LOop8ack, range with "S2" is working correctly now. I made a video for the other 2 possible bugs Link to video :

^^ THIS But we have at least the CHENGDU FC1/JF-17, a great multi role plane

For realism purpose, it need to be implement, DEKA can do it :)

- air/air radar, increasing range with TDC, range go directly to 80 mn, 20 ----> 80, decreasing range with TDC is ok, 80 -->40 -->20 - air/air radar, when a target is locked as STT, i can't select another SOI (MFCD) - air/air radar, after cycling TWS --> VS --> RWS --> TWS, i can't modify TWS azimut

+1

For a game, perhaps, but for a simulator, not really F-14 Big old plane has better sustained turn rate and is better dogfighter that F-16 F-18 mig-29,.... F-14 old big phoenix better than amraam 120C F-14 old radar immune against ecm etc.... YOu have a true winner here... That's not serious for a simulator, strange that ED does not react or not so strange in fact :) F-14 will be even better than futur EF-2000 :megalol:

I will write one and send it to you, but it will be in FRENCH. About R27 IR seeker (36T), in one of my books, i can read : "It has means to received target data from the radar or optical locator" Since my english is crap, what does that means ? :)

It would be great and we could start consider DCS as a flight combat simulator. Something more believable and realistic is very easy to do, but it seems to be delibarate that developpers don't implement some basic about ecm/eccm Like i already said, "DCS hollywood combat flight game" :) Not to mention the phoenix, a pure joke :megalol:

+1

Asks Dassault ingineers :) ".. When we were in the Persian Gulf, we had a week where we fought the Emirati Mirage 2000-5 pilots. They were actually quite aggressive pilots who displayed a keen awareness of the tactics to employ against the weaknesses of the F-14A. They would jam to the merge, then pull 9Gs, flying so high we almost lost sight." https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27889/confessions-of-a-navy-f-14-fleet-pilot-turned-f-5-aggressor

No old technology, a tomcat' radar can't even lock a jamming modern fighter

Thx Pepin1234, will try Interresting, I didn't know that, will do some to see how it works.

It's sad, you kill my dream ..:)

Before or after launch is not the point. The point is : Is an IR missile able to switch to Flares or stronger signal (before or after launch)? Answer is : YES Then ,after launch it can switch to anorther target with "stronger signal or due to it's prioritization of target (IR head seeker programmed with database) Not really, it was just "would it be possible ?" And most importandly, why in DCS my "ET" can't lock my "ER", i am sure in reality, it can. It's not magic, it's logic and head seaker programming..

I just see one of your post in the russian forum : https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4445625&postcount=9093 I like your sentence "and the missile should be perfectly capable of locking into a more powerful signal, like flares in the overall FOV." Funny, isn't it :)

Ok, it can't work, it was a cool idea...for the fun :)

OK i will try to simplify for you. Why an IR missile switch to Flares ? because of their thermal signature being stronger. Now imagine the T following the R and at some point it see a stronger thermal signature (the bandit). What it is supose to do ?

Euh no, if you read carefully my answer, you will understand why. I hope you know that an IR missile can switch for another target depending of the emitting source (it's like flares works for exemple :))

It will not loose lock, it will keep the lock until it see the bandit (hotest emititing source) Sure.

?? Certainly not, if the R go to chaff, that means the T is in range for his head to track the aircraft (heatest emitting source), but chances are high that it would have gone to the target way before the R go for chaff. It's easy to program priority filters for infrared homing head Since the 2 R27 have the exact same motors, it should work. No, like i explain previously. On the contrary the bad guy will only know about SARH missile, willl decoy chaff(like you said:)) and.....surprise :D

Yes, it's to avoid the T to be confused by the heat emission of the R (iF the T is lock on the target), and it could confirm that the T can lock on the R. But in my concept, i want the T to lock on the R to take the path/guidance of R to have 2 missiles that go to the target. It need to be launch right after the R (without lock on the target) The goal is to give more range to the T (slightly less than the R)and to have a better PK Why, since the T is not radio correct

DCS hollywood combat flight game :)

Sure, but logically it should go for the heatest source. If it's true, it's sad because this method reduce drastically the launch range. But probably they don't want the bad guys (blue) know about their correct method :) False information to confuse ennemies.

The 36T passive infrared homing heat allows homing of missile to aircrafts, cruise missiles, Drones,... Its has means to received data from radar or optical locator :) Ok, if i launch a R-27ER and right after i launch a R-27ET, the ET should lock on the big heat emission of ER, correct ? So it will follow the path of r-27ER, till it detect a bigger heat source (aircraft). In that way we can launch missiles by pair and optimize PK. Why this doesn't work in the game, the ET does not lock on the ER heat emission ?