Jump to content

sylkhan

Members
  • Posts

    668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sylkhan

  1. Nobody ? I don't think so. weapon's overall Pk is not an indicator, because it's biased, you know. Like i said previously overall pk is biased But correct performance is need for all missiles, with coherent ECM, ECCM environnement (essential). They just try to hide the lost of F-16, i's understandable, that's not good for F-16 sells. And most importantly, a F-16 shot down by a mig-21 :).
  2. Interesting article who give a better idea about true capacity of amraam (specifically c-5). The Amraam C-5 appear to be effective only against old fighters (with poor EW and ECM) at launch distance < 20 mn, but ineffective against modern fighters, and at launch distance > 20 mn. Not so good. https://idrw.org/amraam-kill-map-in-syria-shows-how-paf-f-16s-missed-su-30mki-by-miles/ R-73 is a good missile :) https://theprint.in/defence/8-pieces-of-clinching-evidence-that-show-how-iafs-abhinandan-shot-down-a-pakistani-f-16/278752/
  3. sylkhan

    SD-10

    Yes, i know Will be fine? for who? For you and ED ? But what do you know about sd-10 ? nothing.. Perhaps it would be better to let people who know better to do their own missile with new FM, because it seems it will be ED work.
  4. sylkhan

    SD-10

    ... and some people just love the AMRAAM and want it to be super missile Oh, i know the ED agenda (and yours), killing the sd-10.
  5. Hello Khopa, DCS liberation seems to be great and i started to test it. My first question is : How to create/modify Factions or to create it's own faction ? Thx
  6. It is and has always been part of Europe, like Russia. But it is no longer part of UE, it's a different things :)
  7. It's good, sometimes, to hear "the voice of raison", it's so rare. I wonder why ED don't do something about this. It's totally unrealistic I don't think it's ED, they can't do something so arcadish.
  8. это проблема для всех стран, для Америки тоже. Америка дает много ложной информации.
  9. I hope, because i don't care about US aircrafts and carrier
  10. ^^ THIS Magic for you.. This argument means nothing, many things need to be take into consideration, particularly the conditions of engagement, and the truth about military fights is never totally disclosed to the general public, only the goods parts or propangada stories, but i hope you know that. Easy.. you can do better..or not :) Normal (see my previous answer), but that doens't means it never happen and in fact it happens, the proof by Yefim. Do you really think a country will say "hey world" we have some problems with our military hardware, it's not as reliable as we thought", seriously. Are you biased ? :)
  11. Exactly, and some things can't be simulate because unknown. For this reason, simulation will never be like real life, and often, far from the reality.
  12. No the ones who did the upgrade. Ah, where is my simplication ? I just say that France/Russia have some hidden military technology, that's not a simplification but a fact. From what internet documents are you talking about ? You are the one who has too much imagination :) :)
  13. Radar power is not the only factor, US specialists didn't seems to be able to solve the problem, then it's not your little knowledge who will give the answer :) Some countries like France/Russia have some hidden/secret military technologies. Philosophy of these countries are not the same as US and military technologies are well protect. Don't be over simplistic.
  14. Sure, but i don't think they want to go this route with russian hardware. Sadly, but simulating a coherent/believable electronic warfare is very difficult due to the lack of real informations (not public/marketing or propaganda informations).
  15. Yes he is .. What sources ? ED has only access to public sources, the same everybody can have, and these sources are not reliable. Yefim Gordon has true first hand sources, but they don't please a lot of people :)
  16. Great idea. Thx Rudel
  17. Great, welcome back LOop8ack
  18. Ahaha, everyone knows about this story for children, it's just like always, US propaganda version to cover up their incompetence. If you want the true story, ask lieutenant "zoltan dani" commander of Serbian SAM forces. To sum up, he didn't even know that they shot down a F-117 and i remember the serbian slogan "Ooops, sorry we didn't know it was a stealthy fighter" :lol: Ok, i am done with your "stealthy revolutionnary F-117" :) you can believe what you want, it will not change the truth.
  19. No The F117 was killed by a serbian SA-3 (russian technology from...1960):) You mean only old serbian radars can see it, who can believe that ? :)
  20. Rule N°2 : Never ever trust any claims, numbers or promises coming from USA or US companies.(in fact need to be rule n°1) You mean like the so called "revolutionnary" steath" F-117 :lol:
  21. Great news, thx Uboats. JF-17 will be perfect :)
  22. I hope because there is a weird looping internal engine sound that increase with speed that is really annoying. A lot of things are great in this aircraft, except sounds, it's a shame.
  23. I think,we will fly more often without, than with :) Not install by default is better IMO
  24. It will work only if a country with E-3, E-2 awacs is in your coalition No, not now.
×
×
  • Create New...