sylkhan

It is and has always been part of Europe, like Russia. But it is no longer part of UE, it's a different things :)

It's good, sometimes, to hear "the voice of raison", it's so rare. I wonder why ED don't do something about this. It's totally unrealistic I don't think it's ED, they can't do something so arcadish.

это проблема для всех стран, для Америки тоже. Америка дает много ложной информации.

I hope, because i don't care about US aircrafts and carrier

^^ THIS Magic for you.. This argument means nothing, many things need to be take into consideration, particularly the conditions of engagement, and the truth about military fights is never totally disclosed to the general public, only the goods parts or propangada stories, but i hope you know that. Easy.. you can do better..or not :) Normal (see my previous answer), but that doens't means it never happen and in fact it happens, the proof by Yefim. Do you really think a country will say "hey world" we have some problems with our military hardware, it's not as reliable as we thought", seriously. Are you biased ? :)

Exactly, and some things can't be simulate because unknown. For this reason, simulation will never be like real life, and often, far from the reality.

No the ones who did the upgrade. Ah, where is my simplication ? I just say that France/Russia have some hidden military technology, that's not a simplification but a fact. From what internet documents are you talking about ? You are the one who has too much imagination :) :)

Radar power is not the only factor, US specialists didn't seems to be able to solve the problem, then it's not your little knowledge who will give the answer :) Some countries like France/Russia have some hidden/secret military technologies. Philosophy of these countries are not the same as US and military technologies are well protect. Don't be over simplistic.

Sure, but i don't think they want to go this route with russian hardware. Sadly, but simulating a coherent/believable electronic warfare is very difficult due to the lack of real informations (not public/marketing or propaganda informations).

Yes he is .. What sources ? ED has only access to public sources, the same everybody can have, and these sources are not reliable. Yefim Gordon has true first hand sources, but they don't please a lot of people :)

Great idea. Thx Rudel

Great, welcome back LOop8ack

Ahaha, everyone knows about this story for children, it's just like always, US propaganda version to cover up their incompetence. If you want the true story, ask lieutenant "zoltan dani" commander of Serbian SAM forces. To sum up, he didn't even know that they shot down a F-117 and i remember the serbian slogan "Ooops, sorry we didn't know it was a stealthy fighter" :lol: Ok, i am done with your "stealthy revolutionnary F-117" :) you can believe what you want, it will not change the truth.

No The F117 was killed by a serbian SA-3 (russian technology from...1960):) You mean only old serbian radars can see it, who can believe that ? :)

Rule N°2 : Never ever trust any claims, numbers or promises coming from USA or US companies.(in fact need to be rule n°1) You mean like the so called "revolutionnary" steath" F-117 :lol:

Great news, thx Uboats. JF-17 will be perfect :)

I hope because there is a weird looping internal engine sound that increase with speed that is really annoying. A lot of things are great in this aircraft, except sounds, it's a shame.

I think,we will fly more often without, than with :) Not install by default is better IMO

It will work only if a country with E-3, E-2 awacs is in your coalition No, not now.

Insult is the weapon of the weak, but not surprising from you. Like i said i am done with the Phoenix. Happy gaming

Ridiculous. Fisrt, it was a joke, but perhaps a little too subbtle for Jojo...... Second, a phoenix is 4.01 m for 447 kg, a r27er is 4.80m(ouch) for 350kg, not bad :). A fighter, as little as mig29 can carry 2X r27er + 2X r77+2X r73 + fuel tank 1400 kg. Then no, you don't need a fighter as big as f-14 to carry 2X phoenix. I am sure su-27 could carry X4 phoenix easyly But since the phoenix is the deadliest missile of the world :), 2 is more than enough. AMERICAN COMBAT EXPERIENCE with phoenix vs fighters - On January 5, 1999, a pair of US F-14s fired two Phoenixes at Iraqi MiG-25s southeast of Baghdad. Both AIM-54s' rocket motors failed and neither missile hit its target...Ooops :) - On September 9, 1999 another US F-14 launched an AIM-54 at an Iraqi MiG-23 that was heading south into the No-Fly Zone from Al Taqaddum air base west of Baghdad. The missile missed, eventually going into the ground after the Iraqi fighter reversed course and fled north. A little turn and....Oooops :lol: And that's not against modern agile fighters with great jamming systems. To sum up : A DCS f-14 with a radar immune against jamming fighter + the deadliest missile, and you have a winner :) Ok guys, i am done with the meteor, euuuhh the phoenix. DCS is a game after all Happy gaming :)

Then why US desperately try to make an effective long-range missile (meteor like) against moderrn fighters, they already have it,... the old Phoenix from 60/70, They have the technology since 50 years, perhaps they forgot how to do it :) Someone need to tell them, but he has to think twice, before doing that :)

Do you realize we are talking about DCS, or my english is so bad, i don't understand what you mean :) Just do a test with your game , you will not be going in prison :megalol:

My question was for DCS not for RL :) OK DCS F-14 vs a jamming DCS F-16 block 50, at what range the DCS F-14 radar will burn through, at angel 20. Do you have enough informations ?