norbot

Did you simply ask for a replacement per mail or does TM have some kind of an online shop for spare parts?

I meant the F-14, because I didn't buy it.

Ähm, Mädels, was hat eure persönliche Fehde hier mit Luft- und Raumfahrt News zu tun? :huh: (Ich meine QuiGon und RightStuff)

Is this your personal opinion or is there an objective source of information? Link?

https://www.flugrevue.de/sikorsky-stellt-angepassten-entwurf-vor-raider-x-fuer-fara-wettbewerb/

Try this:

I'm just asking myself, why someone buys an EA product, if he can't wait one week for an update??? :doh::doh::doh:

+1.

Come on, you're not really impressed by the notorious complainers here, are you? So no information for all is better? :huh:

Andere Flugzeuge (z.B. Tanker) findest du am einfachsten mit TACAN. Auf Youtube gibt es jede Menge Videos dazu. Suche einfach nach "DCS" und "AAR" (air-to-air refuelling). Dann findest du z.B. das:

A6M2 Zero + a Japanese carrier

You can only carry AIM-9 on stations 2 and 4.

Well, probably not during simulated air combat. Else you wouldn't really bother about throwing flares at your enemies air inlet, with a chance of something like 0,0001 % to hit it and even smaller to cause damage with them. :)

FACS wird es vielleicht in 10 - 15 Jahren geben. Da gibt es noch nicht mal einen Konzeptenwurf, geschweige denn einen flugfähigen Prototypen...

Like Emmy said, then you're dead already. :D

Since flares are only relatively small pyrotechnic cartridges, I have slight doubt that they would damage turbine blades if ingested. In addition, they do not fly on a straight trajectory behind the aircraft but fall in a ballistic curve. How do you want to aim at the air intake of an airplane behind you and even hit it with your flares??? :huh:

I bought a TM Warthog replacement stick from Thrustmaster in 2017. TM offered it for 114 €, shipping fees included. I just wrote a mail to http://support.thrustmaster.com and asked for a replacement stick. The stick was delivered in something like 10 days. :thumbup:

Just had my first take-off, something like 15 minutes of free flight and a subsequent landing. Feels great! Thanks ED! :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

Bell 360 Invictus Für die US Army gibt's wohl bald neue Hubschrauber: https://www.flugrevue.de/angebot-fuer-den-fara-wettbewerb-der-us-army-bell-360-invictus-enthuellt/ Die Ähnlichkeit mit dem RAH-66 Comanche ist nicht zu übersehen: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing-Sikorsky_RAH-66 Da musste ich gleich an den alten Schinken "Comanche 4" denken (https://store.steampowered.com/app/32750/Comanche_4/). :D

After watching a few videos about the Lightning and having read some articles about it, I can only say - a very extraordinary aircraft. It would be nice to be able to fly her one day in DCS. :thumbup:

Ja, da bin ich bei dir. Über die wollte ich schon gar nichts sagen... ;)

I'm sure everybody here knows, we're talking about a simulator, so we don't have actual engineering or structural costs. :doh: You still have to programm those 'pixels' to do whatever they are intended to do. It's a lot of work for a single cockpit. What about the other stations in a large bomber? They all have to be programmed too and linked and sychronized to each other. So probably much more work to do, than a single-seater, meaning it's gonna cost a lot more money to develop. Would you be willing to pay a multiple of the cost of a normal module for a bomber?

And your statement is based on what? Did you do market research about the requirement of multi-crew aircraft in combat simulators? It's only your opinion, too. You must live with it, that not everybody has to agree with you.

No statement from the developers for a long time. Not much activity on github either (https://github.com/heclak/community-a4e-c/issues). Problems within the team or negotiations on a full module? Just speculating. :music_whistling::D

I only speak for myself, but my interest in an airplane with more than 2 crew members is zero. It's already a problem to find a reliable co-pilot for DCS, let alone to fill all the other stations of a large bomber like the B-52. I can't really imagine that many users would be interested in such a multicrew monster. In the end, such a development must pay off for ED or a 3rd party.