norbot

Es wird vermutlich jede Menge Leute geben, die berechtigt sind, solche Handbücher und Dokumente zu besitzen (z.B. Mechaniker, Ingenieure, Bodenpersonal, Zulieferer). Es wird auch vermutlich überhaupt kein Problem sein, solange diese Dokumente in den USA verbleiben. So wie ich das gelesen habe, wollte man eben diese Dokumente aus den USA in ein anderes Land verbringen. Das kann durchaus strafbar sein.

Von der Festnahme habe ich auch gelesen. Aber wir wissen darüber auch nicht wirklich viel. Wegen einem Post in diesem Forum ist bisher vermutlich noch keiner festgenommen worden. Soweit ich das gelesen habe, waren Handbücher und andere Dokumente von mehr oder weniger aktuellen Flugzeugen im von dir angesprochenen Fall im Spiel. Die könnten durchaus unter einer gewissen Geheimhaltungsstufe gestanden sein. Aber wie gesagt, nur eine Vermutung von mir.

Seitens Flagrum. Nur weil aktuell besonders auf eine Forumregel aufmerksam gemacht wird, muss man ja nicht gleich aus dem Forum aussteigen. Aber das ist nur meine Meinung. Kann ja jeder machen, wie er es für richtig hält. Konkrete Fälle, in denen jemand mit der Regel in Konflikt gekommen ist, sind mir auch nicht bekannt, aber ich nehme mir auch nicht unbedingt die Zeit, im Forum besonders aktiv zu sein. Ich habe noch ein Leben außerhalb des Forums. :smilewink:

Naja, also ich habe zumindest den Eindruck, dass hier etwas hysterisch mit Kanonen auf Spatzen geschossen wird.

Looks pretty good. I assume that the armrest is height adjustable, since there are still some holes visible that are currently not used. Can you tell us what the overall construction weighs?

I can't agree with your opinion, that the point of the Eurofighter program was to be better than the Eagle. It was developed as a European fighter against the airforces of the Warsaw Pact. The European countries who developed it, didn't simply want to buy an American fighter, because their industry would have lost their own know-how in this sector. It's not a good idea to be completely dependent on the US in this sector - as in any other area. Whether the Eurofighter was better or worse than the F-15 was hardly decisive for the project and the subsequent production at any time.

Good luck to you, Merker and thank you for your hard work on the Community A-4E Mod during the past years! Your team has managed to create a truly great mod with which I have spent many nice and interesting hours. :)

Hahaha! I knew it. The aces always come from Austria. :D:smilewink:

We always are test lab rats. I bought a VKB Gunfighter some time ago and then they released the MK II. :joystick:

My free time for DCS is quite limited, so from my perspective it would be very helpful, if we had an easy refueling option. It could be just a box to check or uncheck in the options of the respective aircraft. Those who need it hardcore, can have it their way, the ones who don't, would have to option to fly missions with an AAR, without having to train hours and hours for it. Why not let the user decide? :huh:

Yes, I don't think two of these would fit into the I-16: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7%22/44_caliber_gun :D

I bought the Normandy map when it was released and regretted it an hour later. I do not think I'll buy another one from Ugra Media. Same feeling about the WWII Assets Pack. :(

Maybe the site-admin could move the thread into the "Licensed Third Party Projects --> OctopusG", as suggested by the OP? Thanks! :)

Auf Youtube gibt es ein "First Look" Video. Sieht nicht schlecht aus, der kleine Hüpfer:

I'm quite surprised, too. But on the other hand we have Yak-52 and Christen Eagle...

Just saw this "first look" video: Great job, you guys at OctopusG! Congratulations! :thumbup:

I can only agree. The F-5 is a really nice aircraft, especially if you want to fly by yourself. In the F-18 you're flying a computer, but its fun, too. :D

Type 24 should have 2 x 0.30 inch machine guns and 2 x 0.79 inch cannons ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_I-16#Specifications_(I-16_Type_24).

My last module was the AV-8B a few weeks ago. Together with the F/A-18C and the A-10C it keeps me more than busy. Next one will be the F-16 as soon as it will be available.

It is already there: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=636

Nobody says they have a new project. It's just common that you do not stick to a module once you've developed one. You earn money with one module. With several modules you earn more money. :D

There's a new module to buy: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/i-16/ :music_whistling:

I wish the developers good luck. It's good to have another third-party developer in DCS. I'm just curious what their next project will be.

On DSMS page, weapons profile, switch from SGL (single) to PRS (pairs).

Press "backspace".