kotor633

Hi, I'd also like to know the reason for removing the targeting pod from the manual. Why didn't they simply add the section on the sniper pod?

Another good source: Fly & Wire Topic: TWR, Fuel & Performance https://flyandwire.com/2025/10/06/mig-29-9-12a-twr-fuel-performance

Hi, The world as we know it is about to collapse. Still no F1M. We don't already have enough modules...to keep us happy. Let Aerges mess around, they'll get in touch as soon as they have something to show. The F1BE & EE are very good examples. By the way: How long have we been waiting for the F-14 95 early & Iran version? We haven't heard anything from Aviastorm regarding the Tornado here in the forum either. The Bo-105 has been in development for how long (10 years)? Etc. It is what it is. As the motto in DCS is: Be patient. Aerges has done a great job so far & they will do the same with the F1M. I have the module myself. And I hope the F1M will be released soon. But it will take some time. For now, enjoy what's currently available in DCS.

Rafale sounds very interesting. I'm curious to see how it develops in DCS.

Hi, sagt mal kann es sein das Rakuzard nun (auch) als SchleckiLP in youtube unterwegs ist? Habe eben ein Video angesehen & stimmlich würde ich behaupten das er es ist...

Also ich konnte erst jetzt wieder die Seite aufrufen.

You may see it that way. And I agree with you, there are still a few annoying bugs there. But this module has been available since December 2019. So far there is only a Chinese manual. The translation is okay, but who can say that it is translated correctly. To what extent can I trust what is written there in English? Why should we as customers even worry about the translation? We have no way of judging whether what is translated is correct. The manufacturer dealt with this in detail when they developed the module. They are the best placed to write such a manual. The manufacturer has a responsibility here, not us as customers. Of course, developing a module like this is more exciting than writing a manual like this. But it's part of it. But manuals in DCS are a topic in themselves anyway. And luckily there is Chuck's Guide, of course!!

Hi, @BIGNEWYCould you please publish a roadmap for the Mig-29, similar to the AH-64, F-18, and F-16? I think the community would greatly appreciate it.

Well, there are two modules that would be next: the OH-58E and the Chinhook. And a few guides that need updating. I'll just wait and see what happens. I find it impressive how he keeps track of the sheer number of guides he's published.

Hi, And please, after all these years of this module being available, please finally publish a proper English manual...!

I'm personally considering whether it makes sense to buy the panel for the Mig. The Mig wasn't intended for flying long, complicated routes. And with the new DTC options and the RSBN/PRGM cars, I think we've already been given good navigation tools (and thus quite a few options) for the Mig. When the GCI implementation arrives, hopefully soon and not in a few years... Sure, the panel looks great in the Mig, and you could probably do a little more with it.

Hi, I think this is reserved only for VR users...

You're welcome. I only recently learned about this here in the forum, because I asked about the functionality of this option.

Hi, uncheck this: null

I can confirm the issue too.

Hi, Unfortunately, that's the way it is. Years ago, I bought the NS 430 as a pop-up window (requires DCS World version 2.5.2 or above). However, waypoints, city names, airports, etc. are still displayed. The map in the background is missing (example: Syria): null

Ach das ist das? Okay, danke für die Info. Ich war da auf das Monocle am HMS fokusiert. Auf diese drehende Sensoren habe ich überhaupt nicht geachtet.

This text, however, mentions the flanker. But regarding mixed seekers and BVR, it says the following: "A competent Flanker driver gets the first shot with three or four round salvo of long burn R-27 variants, with mixed seekers, leaving one or two remaining salvoes of BVR missiles on his rails" So, can we not rule out the possibility that it exists? The question is, is this something only used by the Russian Air Force? Or also in other countries that use the R-27 variants? For example, India? And was this possible with our FF Mig-29A? Source: https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-BVR-AAM.html#mozTocId611424

Yes, because information is scarce here...not so easy.

So, the (E)Rs and (E)Ts on the Mig-29A can only be carried at stations 1 and 2 anyway. So what role this switch plays regarding the inner and outer stations is beyond me. And we're not talking about mixing A2A and A2G weapons here. This is exclusively about two A2A missiles. It's possible in the FC3 version, isn't it? Or is it implemented incorrectly there? And is it correct in the FF version?

Hi, I have a question about A2A loadout: In the book Jane's How to Fly and Fight in the Mikoyan Mig-29 Fulcrum - Jon Lake - 1998, page 39, it says the following: null I'm a bit surprised that mixing the R-27(E)T and (E)R is no longer allowed in the FF Mig-29 loadout. I don't know to what extent this was actually used in practice, of course. But according to this article, it should have been possible. Or is it because we have an export version in DCS, and it wasn't possible there? Can anyone here comment on this?

Guten Abend, ist irgendjemandem klar, was unter Optionen - Special - Mig-29 dieses HMD SCAB Animation sein soll?

@Phantom711 Nein noch nicht. Werde ich aber noch tun, wollte mal abwarten ob hier jm. dazu evtl. was sagen kann.

You are welcome.