kotor633

Okay, ich sehe jetzt hier keinen Unterschied in den Aussagen. Jeder soll hier mit dem Modul Spaß haben, dass zu ihm passt & mit dem er sich gerne befasst. Können wir uns darauf einigen?

Maybe one of these:

Auf jeden fall. Auch die Mi's finde ich viel interessanter als bspw. der hochgezüchtete Apache. Jedem das seine.

Finally, things are picking up speed! What you see in the introductory video is SO exciting for the Mig-29!

Videos from ED, Matt Wagner

Hi, No, too expensive. I'm fine without FFB. I'll definitely enjoy it! Thanks

Hallo, Removing or adding the pylons on the wings of the Mig-29 doesn't affect the corresponding total weight. It's a minor change, but it's not accurate in terms of realism. Will this be fixed?

So, I received the Virpil Base and Mount Desk today, so I can use the FLKR Grip to its full potential. ED, get to work, finally give us the FF Mig-29A. Because without the Mig, everything's stupid!

Since January 2024, the English manual has been in 'proof read' status. The latest statement from ED on this was that there is currently a lack of corresponding manual writers.

A look at the current changelog answers your question.

Hi, I would like to ask you not to start discussions here. Please use other discussion threads for that. I would like to establish a collection/point of contact for Mig-29 videos for the (FF) Mig-29 module.

Hi@all/Migheads, da das FF Modul Mig-29A in den Startlöchern steht, es hier aber noch keinen deutschsprachigen Diskussionsthread gibt & ich mich auf dieses Modul wie kein anderes freue, möchte ich diesen gerne hier eröffnen. Ich hoffe & freue mich auf einen regen & sachlichen Austausch.

Mi-26, Mi-28, Mi-35, MH-53 PaveLow III

Hi, So, what's next for the Gazelle? Things have (unfortunately!) been pretty quiet around this module lately. Which I personally regret, as it's one of my favorites. Polychop clearly has a lot on its plate with the Kiowa. And since PC only has one or two developers (I think I remember, but I could be wrong) who work on the modules, it's clear that one module will have to wait a little longer for fixes/updates/improvements. I think there's still a lot more that could be done with the Gazelle to give the module more depth. So, it would be a good move for PC to comment on this.

Yes, I find it a bit frustrating too... But one is a third-party provider, the other is ED. One does it this way, the other does it that way. We have to stick to ED's standard motto: be patient...

Hi, zerO_crash wrote "that it's coming this year." Which, in DCS terms, means "be patient."

I'd jump at the chance to buy an AC-130. C-130 (and later the MC-130)...I'd rather wait and see. It's Mig-29 time right now anyway!

Dieses Modul ist so gar nicht auf meinem Radar. Bin voll auf Mig-29 eingestellt. Aber ja, klingt SEHR interessant. Ich gehe davon aus dass so ein Flugzeug Multicrewunterstützung haben wird. Und für SinglePlayer einen entspr. Jester/Petrovich/Georg? Schau mr mal was da kommt.

And where did you get this information? Where does it say that, or is this just a guess on your part? Regarding the manual: I'll repeat myself, I think the manual topic seems to be the 'unloved child' in DCS. The ED doesn't provide any clear guidelines... Fortunately, we have Chuck and a provisional English translation. The module itself is excellent; there's nothing to complain about.

I don't quite understand why they publish a roadmap for the F-16, F-18, and AH-64 with features they plan to implement. And then continually update this list as soon as a feature is implemented. But that doesn't exist for the Mi-24.

Yes, absolutely.

As far as has been announced, "the English translation has been finished and is currently being proofread." As of January 18, 2024 (https://forum.dcs.world/topic/340168-mi-24p-manual)