kotor633

Okay, so ED wanted it that way that you can see the head of the CPG in the cockpit when panning the view back and forth (which automatically disappears at a certain zoom level/panning range). The pilot was generally not given a head. Mi24P_Pilot_without_a_head_2.trk

Hi, With the updates DCS 2.9.0.47168 Open Beta & DCS 2.9.1.48111 Open Beta there was an update for the Mirage regarding the IFF. Since this update was a bit lost in my opinion and didn't describe exactly what this update entails, I'm glad that there is now at least a video. Thanks to the video creator.

This statement is correct regarding the CPG. But no matter what zoom setting I make: the pilot simply doesn't have a head. Mi24P_Pilot_without_a_head.trk

The manual situation is generally neglected in DCS... although there are good and negative examples. It would be nice if a 'clear line' were introduced here.

I logged in to the RAZBAM Discord server. Because I'm interested in what happens next with the Harrier. Since I can't understand why you can't post this here in the official DCS forum, I'll just be so cheeky and post the official statements here (or are they state secrets...?):nullnull null

Hi, It would be good if you made a statement about the development of the Harrier here: Is the module now finished or are there more features to be added? When will the manual for the Harrier continue?

Don't let yourself be put under pressure. We know that you do this voluntarily and that you invest a lot of time and work in these guides (and the quality and content are sometimes better than many manuals...)

Hi, Just out of curiosity: Which version do you prefer to travel with, the A or B version? What appeals to you about each version? Personally, I like the A version better. I love the 'shrill whistle' of the engines. And also that with the A version you have to fly more proactively because of the weaker engine; you have to work with her more. My focus is generally on the 'Bombcat' when it comes to the F-14.

Okay, danke. Hätte ja sein können. Ich habe zwar das Modul aber komme jetzt erst auf den Geschmack. Daher habe ich die Entwicklung bisher noch nicht so richtig verfolgt.

Hallo, ist bekannt was als nächstes bei der F-15E implementiert werden soll? Soweit ich weis ist man aktuell dran die JDAMs zu implementieren. Gab es seitens RAZBAM sonst noch ein Statement was als nächstes kommen soll?

Hi, @Charly_OwlA question about the Viggen Guide: How important is this guide in your time planning? I understand you're working on a guide for the F-15E. But do you have an update planned for this guide?

Hi, I think it's great how the module is taken care of. The manual is always updated. And the Red Flag Campaign is also being taken care of: I'll give Viggen another chance, maybe I'll warm up to her after all. Thanks a lot to you two!!

Great!

Sounds nice. But when will there finally be a finished manual?

Muss das jetzt sein...musst du einen so quälen...! Sieht einfach nur geil aus!

Yes I know what you mean. Of course it would be better if all modules had a uniform status (but that will never be the case) And of course not just visually.

@Polychop Simulations But I still have one question/request: Could you at least explain why the Ranging Reference Marks are needed in the Athos Sight? What kind of information do these lines provide? Or is it enough to measure the distance to the target using laser ranging, align the helicopter, place the designation reticle on the target and fire the HOT3? null

Hi@all, I am currently working as a CPG in the Mi-24P with the Raduga SH. And I'm having a bit of a hard time finding the right way to aim. The only source of information so far is Chuck's Guide (pages 257 & 258) but I can't handle that either... Basic question: How do I use the symbolism of the Raduga SH effectively? How do I correctly determine the distance to the target? Yes, there are 2 Refence Marks 10 & 50. But how do I interpret the Range Finder Marks correctly? null

That's great news! Well, that's a statement you can live with for now. I hope/wish that it doesn't take too long. A good module also needs a proper manual. And your SA 342 has taken a huge step forward! I really enjoy flying virtually with her.

Hi, @Polychop Simulations Is it planned to update the current SA-342 manual?

Und ich dachte ich kannte schon jedes Video von Volk zur KA-50...Thx

Hallo, wie ist denn der aktuelle Stand bei den Helis: Bei der GAzelle wurde doch in der Vergangenheit per Patch eingeführt dass man (zumindest in den Wüstengebieten, glaube ich?) den Sand Filter benötigt. Da ansonsten der Motor beschädigt werden kann. Ist sowas bei den restlichen Helis ebenfalls implementiert? Mir wäre das zumindest bisher nicht aufgefallen, aber ich dachte ich frage vorsichthalber mal hier in der großen Runde. Vor allem jetzt da wir ja diese tollen Staubeffekt erhalten haben, würde das doch Sinn machen.

Thx

Hallo, was mich mal interessieren würde als jm. der sich null mit diesem Muster auskennt: - Hat die Version F-4E, die wir in DCS erhalten, nur ein INS System oder auch GPS? Wurde GPS jemals für die F-4G eingerüstet? und eher modulbezogene Fragen: - In wie weit bin ich hier auf Jester angewiesen; eher so wie bei der F-14 oder weniger wie bei der F-15? - Ist man bei der Erstellung von Waypoints ähnlich limitiert wie bei der F-14 (Nur 3)? - Hat sich Heatblur schon mal geäußert Jester 2.0 auch auf die F-14 zu übertragen?