The_Nephilim

yes I seen a guide already and it was very detailed. no I never been charged or charged someone else to help OC their machine.. yes no worries everybody can have an opinion or whatever that don't bother me none. I just thought it was funny he charges for a guide he says no one else will know how to do haha!! yes I can ignore that as well and will.

OK but he was acting like nobody will know how to OC the 285 without his course, I guess he is just trying to sell his product.. either way I would be interested in seeing his next video on the OC and comparrison of other CPU's..

well I never heard of this guy but is he really serious about us buying his course?? what do you think about that LucShep?

well that is good news.

well here is what the analyzer said: Error attempt to index local 'res' (a nil value) Line 2189 Script ./Scripts/Input\Data.lua If the above errors point to DCS internal files, please conduct a !repair. Otherwise remove the respective unofficial mod. Do you use unofficial mods?

GPU Not (yet) detected is your GPU drivers still working maybe they got corrupted and your mods may be an issue.. you also had a VR Runtime error this could cause the game not too start.. run your log in the DCS Discrod log analyzer chat room you have many issues.. but I think the Root cause is your GPU I would check to see if it is functioning properly..

even with textures set to high? it used to have a memory leak when set Textures to high, is this not the case anymore? well I just tested it real quick and when I had Textures on High it allocated right up to my vram limit and went over probally only for a millisecond here is a screenshot on MSI Afterburner look for GPU Memory: and when I put the Textures to Medium it stayed under and a little over at 1 point at max setting. it used to go way over maybe the leak is fix as this is just allocated memory and not in use I guess it has been fixed a bit as wehen I used to set it on medium it would drop the total allocation by 2-3gbs VRam.. guess that is not the case anymore.. I am going to try and run textures on High nect mission I fly and see what happens over and hour or so in the MP Mission.. here is the screenshot of the Textures on med:

well it used to be a memory leak but you can try it out and see if it eats all your 16gb memory. I seen it eat all 12gb of mine test it out.

OK I think I got it. I managed to get with quadviews 11.6MP resolution @60hz and it runs fine. now to calculate that to 90hz would be 11.6X30%=3.48MP. and that is about what I can get and maintain 90FPS with a 4070Ti.. I might be able to swing it up more but it really depends on what is going on in the mission or the map I choose.. so basically it is not as high as some were saying if it is well then it could be a P51 on an empty map lol!! either way to get more resolution reliably at the higher Hz rate will take a better GPU.. Hopefully this help someone in the future or now..

set "Textures" to medium as they really make VRam go out of control.. and try too use Quadviews..

yes I am aware of going that router but I am on Win 11 Pro and I can defer that update indefinetely. but that is not my question.. MS Dropped it as in an article they told us of their dislike of other companies cashing in on their program.. so they x'd it.. gone forever nobody can use it now.. Thnx for your response tho..

could you just post the file or use code tags.. my my

well why we don't do our own benchmark. someone here has to have a 7800x3d cpu and all. If we get a benchmark scenario I would test it out to compare notes.. I am also curious about what the 7800x3d can do here I hear so much talk..

does this pass IC for mp servers?? I am thinking not but what is the main advantage to doing this mod or whatnot?

well the rumors for the 5xxx are not encouraging.. but I still will wait for official word on them and hopefully some benchs. but I think the 5070 is going to have a 192bit bus too.. wondering what a 4080 super would net me right now..

yes I just said it wrong but bit bus is what I ment I corrected the post.. thnx..

"Bit Bus" is very important and I think the 4080super is 256. I have a 4070Ti and 12700K and it is a challenge to run the Reverb G2 @90hz over 50% Native rez and that is with QuadViews for DCS. Mechwarrior 5 mercenaries has some issues too running higher res and hz rates.. and that is just the G2 if you are planning on getting a crystal light in the near future a xx90 series would be in order if you want to run this higher Hz rates.. I can happily run 60Hz all day long but the flickering is something to consider at lower Hz rates..

well Good Luck on that venture

hey there, Yes, the CPU is @5.0GHZ core, the PC Ram is at 1800x2=3600 XMP Profile. the OC on the GPU is 3000mhz core and the VRam is boosted another +1600mhz from the stock setting.. I looked for the stock memory clcok speed but did not see it but anycase whatever the stock speed is add another 1600mhz to it.. EDIT: Clock speed or max clock speed is 12102mhz in msi AB.. I basically oc it too near death lol!! Some other user on Discord is saying I should do better @90hz with my gear?? ReEdit: OK I think I narrowed down the fault to the apache itself casuing the lower fps in DCS. in the F16 and Viggen it is almost ok @90hz.. so I am guessing the module matters as the guy who I was talking too in discord said he only has the f16/18. so Apache drags me down especially when using the TADS.. No worries I am flying now @native rez in toolkit and with quadviews I upped the center rez too 200 and it looks fanatastic.. and still able to maintain 16,6ms or under/better in DCS for now.. So it was a red herring here but I still would like to hear from other G2 users and that fly the Apache what their settings/FPS are in VR. I was thinking and since I can run 11.6MP at 60hz so If I wanted to calculate the 90hz equivalent it would be roughly 3.5MP @90hz. I am going to see if I can run that many pixels in DCS @90hz. And it ended up to about 40-50% native rez which is where it has been set at every time. so there is nothing wrong with my setup just the fact it is the 4070 is not quite up too the task of VR or at least as good as some were thinking it was.. I still believe a 4090 is the only way for high Hz and high Rez.. will look forward to the 5xxx and if I can swing it a 5080 would probally be ideal..

I keep getting told I should be able to get more out of my PC. IDK I tried alot of stuff like complete wipes setting a parttiton once and OC. I ran a benchmark and it comes back as a little above average so I just don't see howe it all seems well on my PC side and in Benchamrks.. I feel like I am chasing a red herring.. here is my benchmark:

Well I think I found the correct settings for my PC. I settled with Quadviews and running 60Hz. I also found I can use QV Companion.. Recommended peripheral resolution: 630x616 (0.200x density) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Recommended focus resolution: 1928x1698 (1.225x density) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Stereo pixel count was: 19391680 (3148x3080) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Quad views pixel count is: 7323648 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Savings: -62.2% 2024-10-30 23:36:10 -0400: Session is using quad views

here are my options @100% and running Quadviews. I can do 80% @60hz no issues. I am trying to get it working at 90Hz with a high rez as I can get.. so far that seems to be about 70-80% with quadviews..

I thought from reraeding the thread, with QV I was getting to run my resolution @80% of native. but now I can only manage getting 60-70% of native rez with no QV. I dont get it why it worked so smooth before and now it is a stutter fest? Quad views pixel count is: 2425944 2024-10-29 10:56:16 -0400: Savings: -80.8% 2024-10-29 10:56:23 -0400: Session is using quad views

Well I did not major in English and it was never my best subject but I thought it sounded pretty clear.. you could have just ask for some clarification if that was what the problem was. Well either way I am just trying to determine from others what rezolution they run with simialr gear. I just think either my PC is faluty somewhere and just trying to determine that from others settings and such..

I am not conflating anythin and I am not an idiot I know the difference with Hz and Resolution and FPS. if you read the entire thread you would know what it worked before and now it doesnt means. I am trying to determine what Resolution I "Should" be able to run at 90Hz. In the G2 I can run 90Hz or 60Hz. now 90Hz is easier on the eyes hence Why I want to try and stay with 90Hz. I am also trying to determine what others are running with similar PC and VR units. Now I am not sure is that hard to understand or am I not explaining it correctly.. I just want to compare notes with other users who have similar setup. so I can see if I am having issues with my PC or am I right in the ballpark..