The_Nephilim

set "Textures" to medium as they really make VRam go out of control.. and try too use Quadviews..

yes I am aware of going that router but I am on Win 11 Pro and I can defer that update indefinetely. but that is not my question.. MS Dropped it as in an article they told us of their dislike of other companies cashing in on their program.. so they x'd it.. gone forever nobody can use it now.. Thnx for your response tho..

could you just post the file or use code tags.. my my

well why we don't do our own benchmark. someone here has to have a 7800x3d cpu and all. If we get a benchmark scenario I would test it out to compare notes.. I am also curious about what the 7800x3d can do here I hear so much talk..

does this pass IC for mp servers?? I am thinking not but what is the main advantage to doing this mod or whatnot?

well the rumors for the 5xxx are not encouraging.. but I still will wait for official word on them and hopefully some benchs. but I think the 5070 is going to have a 192bit bus too.. wondering what a 4080 super would net me right now..

yes I just said it wrong but bit bus is what I ment I corrected the post.. thnx..

"Bit Bus" is very important and I think the 4080super is 256. I have a 4070Ti and 12700K and it is a challenge to run the Reverb G2 @90hz over 50% Native rez and that is with QuadViews for DCS. Mechwarrior 5 mercenaries has some issues too running higher res and hz rates.. and that is just the G2 if you are planning on getting a crystal light in the near future a xx90 series would be in order if you want to run this higher Hz rates.. I can happily run 60Hz all day long but the flickering is something to consider at lower Hz rates..

well Good Luck on that venture

hey there, Yes, the CPU is @5.0GHZ core, the PC Ram is at 1800x2=3600 XMP Profile. the OC on the GPU is 3000mhz core and the VRam is boosted another +1600mhz from the stock setting.. I looked for the stock memory clcok speed but did not see it but anycase whatever the stock speed is add another 1600mhz to it.. EDIT: Clock speed or max clock speed is 12102mhz in msi AB.. I basically oc it too near death lol!! Some other user on Discord is saying I should do better @90hz with my gear?? ReEdit: OK I think I narrowed down the fault to the apache itself casuing the lower fps in DCS. in the F16 and Viggen it is almost ok @90hz.. so I am guessing the module matters as the guy who I was talking too in discord said he only has the f16/18. so Apache drags me down especially when using the TADS.. No worries I am flying now @native rez in toolkit and with quadviews I upped the center rez too 200 and it looks fanatastic.. and still able to maintain 16,6ms or under/better in DCS for now.. So it was a red herring here but I still would like to hear from other G2 users and that fly the Apache what their settings/FPS are in VR. I was thinking and since I can run 11.6MP at 60hz so If I wanted to calculate the 90hz equivalent it would be roughly 3.5MP @90hz. I am going to see if I can run that many pixels in DCS @90hz. And it ended up to about 40-50% native rez which is where it has been set at every time. so there is nothing wrong with my setup just the fact it is the 4070 is not quite up too the task of VR or at least as good as some were thinking it was.. I still believe a 4090 is the only way for high Hz and high Rez.. will look forward to the 5xxx and if I can swing it a 5080 would probally be ideal..

I keep getting told I should be able to get more out of my PC. IDK I tried alot of stuff like complete wipes setting a parttiton once and OC. I ran a benchmark and it comes back as a little above average so I just don't see howe it all seems well on my PC side and in Benchamrks.. I feel like I am chasing a red herring.. here is my benchmark:

Well I think I found the correct settings for my PC. I settled with Quadviews and running 60Hz. I also found I can use QV Companion.. Recommended peripheral resolution: 630x616 (0.200x density) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Recommended focus resolution: 1928x1698 (1.225x density) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Stereo pixel count was: 19391680 (3148x3080) 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Quad views pixel count is: 7323648 2024-10-30 23:36:02 -0400: Savings: -62.2% 2024-10-30 23:36:10 -0400: Session is using quad views

here are my options @100% and running Quadviews. I can do 80% @60hz no issues. I am trying to get it working at 90Hz with a high rez as I can get.. so far that seems to be about 70-80% with quadviews..

I thought from reraeding the thread, with QV I was getting to run my resolution @80% of native. but now I can only manage getting 60-70% of native rez with no QV. I dont get it why it worked so smooth before and now it is a stutter fest? Quad views pixel count is: 2425944 2024-10-29 10:56:16 -0400: Savings: -80.8% 2024-10-29 10:56:23 -0400: Session is using quad views

Well I did not major in English and it was never my best subject but I thought it sounded pretty clear.. you could have just ask for some clarification if that was what the problem was. Well either way I am just trying to determine from others what rezolution they run with simialr gear. I just think either my PC is faluty somewhere and just trying to determine that from others settings and such..

I am not conflating anythin and I am not an idiot I know the difference with Hz and Resolution and FPS. if you read the entire thread you would know what it worked before and now it doesnt means. I am trying to determine what Resolution I "Should" be able to run at 90Hz. In the G2 I can run 90Hz or 60Hz. now 90Hz is easier on the eyes hence Why I want to try and stay with 90Hz. I am also trying to determine what others are running with similar PC and VR units. Now I am not sure is that hard to understand or am I not explaining it correctly.. I just want to compare notes with other users who have similar setup. so I can see if I am having issues with my PC or am I right in the ballpark..

well that is not good to hear. I am wondering what resolution you are set at while running 60hz.. I too went back to 60Hz I did try 100% rez but towards the end it started dropping the FPS to like 55fps.. I guess I am going to have to set it @80% but I was reading my above post and before I was running @90Hz with 80% Rez but now it does not work I don't get why it worked before and that was an online server that worked. I dont understand unless there is some sort of worm or bitcoin miner on my PC?? EDIT: I am also trying to determine if I can run the ReverbG2 @60Hz and 90% Rez what would the 60Hz equivelent be?

I would be very interested in hearing your results

well best bet is to stay on Win 10 and if you do have Win 11 if you have the pro version you can stay on 23h2 forever with gpedit.. Personnely I am staying on Win 10 until I can figure out what to do here.. I also have a G2

well for whatever reasone I am unable to even run @50Rez and 90hz.. I dont get it it was orking before. so I just switched back to 100% @ 60hz..

well I was able with QV get 60% Rez @90Hz, which looks pretty good. I think it looks better then 100% @ 60Hz.. EDIT: Well not sure if it was a fluke but it seems that running at 60% rez is not going to work. when I turned on the FLIR the FPS dropped to like 85fps. I don't remember it doing that before. so This reinstall of Windows I am not going to install the XR Toolkit. andsee what happensand the last timeI did not have Process Lasso installed so maybe that was the difference..

hey guys, I had reinstalled win10 and now when I install Quadviews it is not working? I am unsure what I did wrong but I looked over the instructions at the wiki and I beleieve I did it all correct but it dont work, meaning I do not get the Foveated rendring in my headset and the FPS are low before I was able to run @ 90hz with 60% rez and get over 90fps now it is getting about 62fps.. I will recheck the directions but I am pretty sure I did the same as I did the other day to get it working? EDIT: I guess I had to reset the toolkit program in safe mode then set to defaults and I think I installed QV in the wrong order. a couple reboots and voila it works now or so it seems..

yes it is a end user decision but I prefer the more hz rate. It was ok @60hz but now it does not look as good and I think I am restarting to see the strobe of it.. will experiment with 90hz and QuadViews..

Yes While I am not able to run as high as I stated here I can get a solid 60% rez @90Hz which looks good to me. I am still going to experiment some more but I do believe I am puishing the envelope as much as it can go with this GPU.. I am thinking if I bought the 4080 I could have gotten 70/80% rez.. but this is fine as I would rather run the higher Hz rate as 60Hz is just wierd on the eyes..

Well I had some time to mess with the settings and with QuadViews only I managed to get DCS running @90Hz and 60% rez. I have tried DLSS in the past and did not like it, it seemed to make the image look wierd hard to describe but it did not look good to me.. I mean the performance might be there and I may give it another try. I am doing better then I thought so far with the 4070Ti, I would like to get 70/80% rez @90Hz that would be golden.. but 60% is not too bad and so far the 2 missions I flew init the FPS were fine and did not did below 11.1MS for Frametime.. Thought a couple guys would post the hz rate and resolution in their VR headsets so I could get a better idea where I should be.. As for the 5090 I doubt I am getting one of those it might be a stretch to get a 5080..