Xilon_x

CAPRONI CA.100

I'm not asking you for anything special. I'm just asking you a very simple thing not to get a su-25 or su-25t to get stuck on the grass. such large wheels cannot be stopped by simple grass on the ground and truly unrealistic and ridiculous.

it is in fact in the video where we see the assembly of the aurofighter nuts that this plane and ensures for high speeds and not for low speeds. surely low speed and low altitude eurofighter and very unstable to fly and it is also dangerous.

the difference that you notice between EUROFIGHTER and RAFALE and that RAFALE is an embarked plane. Maybe the French when the Eurofighter was developing they wanted to make a boarded version and therefore they decided to detach themselves from the project and make their own plane for their own facts

what do you mean by improved physics?

ANGOLA

NORTH POLE https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=255239&page=2

no simulator until today uses an annual card payment method. even microsoft simulator do not understand why dcs should use it the new payment method. I'd rather leave it as it is.

is in fact and this is difficult to find these videos, but the fact remains that it is not normal that simple grass can completely stop the taxiing of an S-25 the wheels are too big. other planes could also taxi easily on the grass but not for the purpose of taking off just simply taxiing. What if we had to analyze dynamic behavior on other types of terrain? ice or mud? I wish DCS would just make him walk on the grass with a little friction but see a plane that stops completely on the grass and ridicule the wheel and it's not realistic.

Do you want me to show you born planes that don't taxi on asphalt? ok. A-10 c-17 N156F

it also depends on the type of tire and the shock absorbers

have you put the plane ienglsih and American and German plane and Italian plane? and Russian? I am invalidating your list as you ignore Italians and Russians I will ignore you and your lousy list. not VOTE.

there are two planes that may be comparable to the SU-25. the planes in question are: Northrop YA-9 and second airplane is: AMX International AMX GHIBLI.

there is an object to lock the wheels of an airplane and there is no DCS. the name is.....WHEEL CHOCKS

wrong tire physics and dynamics. if with an airplane rollers off a runway in the grass the plane stops. the reality is completely different su-25 taking off from a budding runway demonstration. example of take-off on a mud and snow runway. my desire is to have a more realistic dynamic on the ground

can eurofighter thypoon carry nuclear weapons? the answer and the bomb B61-12. here read this german article. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21679/the-german-air-force-wants-to-know-if-its-eurofighters-can-carry-u-s-nuclear-bombs

SU-24 A-7E

how a eurofighter is assembled

armament configuration

ok ok in my opinion this tread is useless because it has already been talked about which are the most anticipated planes and there is a long list described. rather you should understand what the priority criteria are. I in the first place would put the modern fighters of this era used now in this period make you the list of the current planes that are missing. I will tell you if the list matches.

loock this link sistem pod not LGB but LDP https://www.eurofighter.com/the-aircraft