Xilon_x

INCIDENTE EUROFIGHTER ITALY TERRACINA its very difficoult drive eurofighter to low speed and to low altitude is very dangerous because eurofighter is projected to hight speed and hight manouver.look this situation Germany incident

in dcs there is no recording player but you have to do everything from the keyboard. play x2 x3 x4 slow motion x2 x3 x4 but there is no revert play there is no rewind there is no loop and very nice to analyze a mission an acrobatic flight a sequence of accident and something missing in DCS

have the possibility to play in your registration, and then again to play in the registration of the registration, and then again in the registration of the registration of the registration, and so on etc. etc. It would make it so easy to accomplish missions that there would not even be a need for the mission editor.

PARACHUTE BRAKE

why dcs not have it on board f-16?

the eurofighter and in production there are only these images https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/screenshots/572/ as for the PANAVIA TORNADO no news no programmer has committed to this project that many SIMMERS in DCS have been waiting for years.

Italian aviation evolution: FIAT G-59 first flight 1948 FIAT G-80 first fly 1951 FIAT G-91 first flight 1956 aerfer Ariete first flight 1958 de Havilland DH.100 Vampire first flight 1943 italian version

CAPRONI CA.100

I'm not asking you for anything special. I'm just asking you a very simple thing not to get a su-25 or su-25t to get stuck on the grass. such large wheels cannot be stopped by simple grass on the ground and truly unrealistic and ridiculous.

it is in fact in the video where we see the assembly of the aurofighter nuts that this plane and ensures for high speeds and not for low speeds. surely low speed and low altitude eurofighter and very unstable to fly and it is also dangerous.

the difference that you notice between EUROFIGHTER and RAFALE and that RAFALE is an embarked plane. Maybe the French when the Eurofighter was developing they wanted to make a boarded version and therefore they decided to detach themselves from the project and make their own plane for their own facts

what do you mean by improved physics?

ANGOLA

NORTH POLE https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=255239&page=2

no simulator until today uses an annual card payment method. even microsoft simulator do not understand why dcs should use it the new payment method. I'd rather leave it as it is.

is in fact and this is difficult to find these videos, but the fact remains that it is not normal that simple grass can completely stop the taxiing of an S-25 the wheels are too big. other planes could also taxi easily on the grass but not for the purpose of taking off just simply taxiing. What if we had to analyze dynamic behavior on other types of terrain? ice or mud? I wish DCS would just make him walk on the grass with a little friction but see a plane that stops completely on the grass and ridicule the wheel and it's not realistic.

Do you want me to show you born planes that don't taxi on asphalt? ok. A-10 c-17 N156F

it also depends on the type of tire and the shock absorbers

have you put the plane ienglsih and American and German plane and Italian plane? and Russian? I am invalidating your list as you ignore Italians and Russians I will ignore you and your lousy list. not VOTE.

there are two planes that may be comparable to the SU-25. the planes in question are: Northrop YA-9 and second airplane is: AMX International AMX GHIBLI.

there is an object to lock the wheels of an airplane and there is no DCS. the name is.....WHEEL CHOCKS