Tom Kazansky

Yeah, even the guys st SAMSUNG are looking forward to new DCS maps I guess.

Well, I hope BigNewy knows (because he announced a patch for today)

R.I.P. Val It's not hard to see how you've influenced my life for decades.

Targets for an upcoming DCS:F-22A?

Das sieht aus wie das Problem hier mit einer Datei der F-14 die manche Antivirensoftware als Bedrohung vermutet (was diese aber wohl nicht ist): Zusammemfassung: Den F-14 Ordner (edit:) und den Download/cache Ordner oder gleich den ganzen DCS Ordner als Ausname in der AV Software angeben, dann DCS reparieren oder die Datei(en) aus der Quarantäne zurück holen.

Windows 11 or Windows 10 plz?

Agreed. But they are not all fake or built after 1989 as stated.

the "Trabi Museum" disagrees on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TrabiMuseum/videos/volkspolizei-trabant/238948630434051/

Seems so, I wonder if those green lines of phase 3 are w.i.p. or close to fix. Made a non official and non perfect but more detailed map of what Ugra showed. Prague would not be covered, but who knows what Ugra will do at the end if the day?

Jau, die Map könnte leicht ein best-seller werden, wenn man mal schaut wie viele Länder in Phase 3 zumindest teilweise detailliert vorkommen. Mit ein bisschen Glück könnten User aus 8 (bzw. 9 wenn man die DDR so mitzählt) Ländern in ihrer Heimat starten. Dann ist die auch noch von Ugra und da hat @MiGCap1 wohl recht. Mach mir auch keine Sorgen über die Qualität.

Nürnberg should be included in phase 3. Made a rough but more detailed map of what Ugra showed. It is not(!) official and not perfect:

+1

Agreed. My comment was aimed at the topic of the thread. There are a lot things that are not simulated yet. But with the decreased rate of CPU performance evolution I'm not too keen on getting those things faster. It's not that OP's point isn't valid nor any other wish that would bring DCS closer to reality.

Yeah, the complexity of a game shouldn't grow faster than the performance of CPUs.

I disagree. Try air2air refuelling before and after adding a larger deadzone. There is a difference I don't like. The better solution should come from ED. If they made this tiny zone that allows engagement of the AP just a bit bigger, no one would notice but those who suffer from this implementation. @UrgentSiesta glad the work around works for you.

I don't claim that it is the best way for I certainly don't know a lot of ways to do so, but I learned a lot from the training missions of the DCS:C-101 Aviojet. Lovely simulated cockpit instruments and immersive navigation training missions, imho.

Have you tried this setting?

Just to sort things out: Are you running DCS in "offline mode"? (The little Antenna icon to the right of the module manager icon on top of the DCS menu)

BigNineLine

Hi, first of all, it is helpful to know that DCS stepped away from the old key number system some years ago. Today all your modules are connected to your account. So you don't need keys anymore to install modules. All you have to do is start the module manager on top of the DCS menu. Here is a nice and short video you might want to take a look at. It covers the buying process (you don't need) and from 1 min 3s on it shows where to find the module manager. In you case you want to select installed modules within the module manager to check for the spitfire.

Have you tried to delete the binding for the TDC? Does it still drift afterwards? If so, you may want to delete the whole set of bindings of that device (on top of its column). Restart DCS and rebind the keys.

und nicht wundern: die Modifikatoren, die man eventuell erstellt hat, werden so nicht mit gespeichert. (Einfach neu machen oder wie in den threads, die @rforce oben gepostet hat beschrieben ist, die "modifiers.lua" im "input" Ordner wiederherstellen.)

From today's changelog: Better late than never. Thanks.

Ich geb dir einerseits recht. Wenn man aber solche Missionen in einer multi player dynamic campaign gegen wichtige (d.h. gut verteidigte) Ziele selber plant und ausführt, kann das schon sehr spannend sein. Die F-117 ist ja auch in echt nicht "unsichtbar", wie man nicht nur 1999 über Jugoslawien gesehen hat.