viper2097

I guess it wasn't any kind of personal attack against you. Its just very uncommon that someone flys the F-16, F-18, A-10c, the Viggen and then calls the M2K as one of the best modules in DCS. However, personal opinions are somithing to talk about, but not to discuss.

Bugtracker is not useable from a mobile device and BY FAR not complete or up to date. Every other Dev can stick to the forum and manage it, why isn't Razbsm able to? When there is a bug reported since over a year, it never gets fixed and then Razbam just moves it to the resolved section without fixing it, thats quite rude to the paxing customers and especially to those who report it.

Its not your fault in any kind. Just every discussion about Razbam modules ends like that.

Glückwunsch zum Kauf. Der Harrier ist ein sehr geiles Flugzeug. Ich würde dir empfehlen dich mit dem Harrier zu beschäftigen, idealerweise auch noch etwas tiefgründiger. Ich prophezeihe dir, dass du dir noch wünschen wirst dass Razbam nicht das Coding der BO-105 machen wird. Einerseits weil du am Harrier die Qualität des Codings sehen wirst, aber auch andererseits weil du mitbekommen wirst wie dort mit Bugs und Feedback umgegangen wird. Wie du wiederholt angelogen wirst und obwohl nichts fertig ist das Modul links liegen gelassen wird weil schon an drei anderen gearbeitet wird. Aber nochmal: Ich verstehe immer noch nicht was meine Einstellung zu Razbam mit den beiden Fragen des TE zu tun hat? Die habe ich beantwortet. Sachlich. Mit Fakten. Ohne meine persönliche Meinung kundzutun.

:thumbup: Thx a lot

Is this anyhow aknowledged by ED?

Will this also be adressed in the updated manual?

Seit wann kann man Fakten so sehen wie man es möchte? Ist nicht das schöne an Fakten, dass sie nicht verdreht werden können? Ich habe dir sogar einen Link dazu gepostet, damit du ihn nicht erst selbst suchen musstest. Ich glaub eher, du legst dir das alles immer so aus wie du es gerne sehen möchtest, da du generell an nichts Kritik zulässt. Selbst wenn die Argumentation dann nur mehr ins lächerliche führt. Aber gut, kann sich ja glücklicherweise jeder selbst seine Meinung bilden. Egal was bei Razbam nicht funktioniert, bzw. welche Probleme sie nicht auf die Reihe kriegen, sie geben immer ED die Schuld daran. Verbringe etwas mehr Zeit im Razbam Forum. Du wirst merken dass ich bei Weitem nicht der Einzige bin der findet dass das Maß voll ist. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=254358 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=255197 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=259367 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=259315 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=258999 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=258185

Beide Bugs seit Ewigkeiten bekannt. Der 1. wird aktuell, nach einer Ewigkeit, von ED angesehen. Den 2. kriegt Razbam seit langer Zeit einfach nicht in den Griff. Existieren für beide etliche Threads im Harrier-Bereich.

Schon lange bekannt: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=247452

Which DCS modules are you also flying? Just to know to which modules you are comparing.

Everything those two guys said above me. Avoid this module, you will only get angry and dissapointed. Better stick to the A10c, the JF-17 or F/A-18. Depends on what you wanna do in detail.

Nur mal so nebenbei: Sollte ein Mod den Thread mal in JF-17 umbenennen?

If the second pickle won't give you a CTD, then it is for me the last pickle which gives me a CTD. It took them 4 months to implement the JDAMs and nithing else. Still bugged all over and CTDs are also included. Dissapointing.

And you think this is the responsibility of user who want to get what they have paid for and got promised, or do you think this is the responsibility from Razbam who constantly lie at their customers, ignore them and don't be able to get their **** done, but instead working already on three other new modules? Interesting fact: No other sub-forum here in the ED forum is so toxic as the Razbam sub is. So think twice if the users are responsible or if Razbam is...

EA is not the problem.

They are constantly saying that there are three indepentend teams working on the M2K, the Harrier and the Mig-19. They said that, because people already went quite angry when the Mig-19 was in developement/ released into EA as the Harrier was there already left behind. Any more specific questions about those three teams are only getting ignored. So, sorry man, either we only get lies from Razbam, or your wish will not come true.

Unbelieveabke that something like this just gets moved to resolved. Maybe this shows how Razbam actualy works...

Nearly a month later, any news on that issue?

Have fun as long as you are still learning it. You will soon realize how bugged and frustrating it is. Latest when you fly a 4h sortie with your buddies and you can't accomplishe just because of one of the thousand bugs.. Very good post, nails it! Even the new invented Jdams, which took them 4 months to code, are bugged all over...

Take the Tacman, pick one thing you like, compare the description there with the DCS Harrier. You'll always end up like this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4142898&postcount=9

F-15E is way more complex then the Harrier. As Razbam already have big problems with the Harrier, I can't imagine that they'll be able to do the Mudhen.

Fact is, that the Harrier is bugged all over, missing a lot of things and even more things are done wrong. So we'll see what kind of definition we'll have to accept.

At least Decoy said that they'll continue working on the F-15, Mig23 & etc. in 2020. Lets see if the Harrier really gets completely finished and becomes bugfree. Razbam promised that the Mirage, Harrier & Mig-19 will be finished before they work on any other module. We'll see if that is true.