viper2097

:lol::thumbup::megalol:

Wenn man das große Ganze betrachtet wäre sie wohl als nächstes HB Modul am wahrscheinlichsten. Auch wenn sie viele sehnlicher einen Tornado von den Jungs wünschen würden. Abgesehen davon: habe ich schon erwähnt dass man an der A6 28 Stück Mk-82 montieren kann? 30 wenn man die Fahrwerksklappen abbaut. Schonmal nachgerechnet wieviele Mk-82 dann eine Tomcat & Intruder Formation mitnehmen können? :)

Die Bremswirkung der F-18 wurde schon mehrfach diskutiert. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere hat auch Mover schonmal bestätigt dass die Bremswirkung der F-18 auch IRL so "schlecht" wie in DCS ist. Ist eben ein Trägergerät... BTW: Irgendwas haben sie aber anscheinend an der friction geändert. Seit ein oder zwei Updates rollen die F-18 und F-16 richtig klasse und auch mit gefühlt viel weniger Widerstand.

Ich will sie clickbar, :joystick::pilotfly:

Seit über nem Jahr ist der Fehler vorhanden, dass bei dem, der die Mission im MP hostet, bzw. wenn du im SP alleine spielst, der Basket bereits deployed wird wenn man sich zum Tanken anmeldet (intent to refuel). Richtigerweise sollte der Basket erst ausfahren wenn man ein "cleared contact" bekommen hat. Das bekommt man, wenn man "ready pre-contact" funkt und sich in der korrekten Position zum Tanker befindet. Die ist etwas unterhalb und etwas hinter dem Tanker.

Wow, ne A-6 von Heatblur wäre ein absoluter Hammer!

Now you know on what they are working: https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims/posts/2703636846389603 Great job, as they just have posted that they are not touching anything other then the existing aircrafts until they are finished. 10 days ago. As you know, their only system coders are Zeus and Elwood (Team 1). Already with 3 bugged and unfinished modules. Well done Razbam, well done. One lie and empty promise hunts down the next. So everyone can build his own opinion about that company. Oh, yeah, and they also want to release the F-15E and Mig-23 this year.

I would be already happy if the one eyed lights in VR could be fixed...

My expectations have been: Much talk, no walk... Seems that Razbam is fulfilling those again. Unfortunately.

So how will the Kuznetsov handled? Will the old one remain in the game? Will there be two in parallel? Will there only be the new one from the supercarrier module? What about owning FC3 or the SU-33 and NOT the Supercarrier? Will the Su-33 then not be anymore able to operate from the carrier?

Even with VR Zoom it is not possible to read them. You can guess them, especially when you know where which should be. But it is really, really hard to read them, I would say impossible. And its nit a generall issue. The Tacan in the Cat is smaller and more away, but I can read it without any problems.

+1 for steam, hope to see the same offer there.

Works perfect, useing it since release: Modified file attached. File path: \DCS World OpenBeta\Mods\aircraft\JF-17 Views.lua

Any news on that issue? For me, it seems that it would be quite easy to fix. Until that happens, I need to manipulate the lua file which breaks my integrity check :-/. Please fix it, this takes 5 minutes. See post Nr. 18. Thank you.

Just move your head a little bit more forward. No problem here with the tacan dial.

Unfortunately, it is still not touched yet. Decoy, didn't you promised to correct all threads who are are, but are still not resolved?

Try that again with the Eurofighter or the Alpha Jet ;).

People who bought the Harrier on EA release waited already quite a long time with a lot of waiting time where nothing happend. And that what is delivered yet, is quality wise not on par with all other modules in DCS. Also bugs do not get fixed over years and wrong implemented things are ignored. Do you think that this is a good base for the Mudhen? You ever thought that people may have a real reason for being so toxic? And that this happens to 95% only to Razbam? However, Razbam promised to finish all existing modules before touching anything new. Again. Lets see if they hold their promise this time, we will see it with the hopefully steady progress in the upcoming months.

More skins available in the core game? Always +1, great idea.

Its not so much about what is missing and what not, its more about how all those missing, wrong implemented and bugged things are handeld by Razbam. People are upset because bug reports are ignored since years, reports about wrong implemented things are ignored and finaly, that the Harrier is regulary abandoned because work is done on other things. I know, if you are new to the Harrier, you'll have a blast with it. I had also. But as soon as you start to dig deeper and not only scratch the surface, you'll realize what is going on. However, Razbam made a very clear statement which said that they will complete all existing modules before they'll touch any new ones. Let's see if they stick to their word. If so, we'll gonna see a lot of updates, bugfixes and improvements over the next weeks and months to the Harrier.

So, how are you able to judge them when you don't even use them? Nice to get some clarification. So we see that you have two system coder (I guess Zeus and Elwood) and one FM coder (I guess Cpt Smiley). Also intresting to read what you understand under the word "team". I'm looking forward to see the Harrier, Mirage and Mig-19 finished, correct and bug-free before they'll do any kind of work on the Mig-23 or F-15. However, if your statement is true, we'll see a lot of upcoming updates for the Harrier and Mirage in the near future. I'm excited. :thumbup:

Have you probably set the textures to low? Its a known bug since a long time, that HUD symbols are missing then: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=226258

Strange statement as you know that your work can only be judged after buying it. You could offer a refund to user who are unhappy when a module is in EA since two years.

Razbam said multiple times that there will be no AI in the backseat.

What I really can't understand is, they can't manage to finish / fix the Harrier since two years. They announced now three other modules. Including the F-15, which seems to be even more complex then the Harrier. In the newsletter, ED praises Razbam for doing an excellent job on the M2K, Harrier and Mig-19. Also ED says that they are sure that Razbam will exceed the expectations. All that doesn't fit for me. In no way. I'm excited what this year will bring us...