viper2097

Great question, an answer on that would be highly appreciated.

Also ich muss mal generell sagen dass die Jeff echt ein wahnsinnig gutes Erstlingswerk von Deka ist. Mal schaun wie der Support weitergeht, aber bis jetzt bereue ich keinen Cent. Klar, Bugs sind da, und vorallem viele fehlenden Key bindings nerven, aber die Basis passt mal. Ich finde übrigens auch nicht dass die Cockpittexturen schlecht aussehen, zumindest in VR empfinde ich das nicht minderwertiger als andere Module. Dafür sind viele andere Details total toll umgesetzt. Naja, sehen wir mal wohin der Weg führt.

Is thix fixed with the next patch, or not? (Sorry to ask, but it is in the "fixed" section, but the threat title does not say [fixed] and also the answer from L0op8ack does not clarify things. I don't have a spare axis for the radar elevation, so I need to bind "Sensor (WMD7/TV/Radar Elev) Down" and "Sensor (WMD7/TV/Radar Elev) Up" to two buttons. Works fine for radar elevation, but I can't use the zoom in the TGP. If I use thwose buttons with the TGP, it only moves the picture up and down.

Summarization about the Harrier situation: Sad but true…

+1

It would be great if the view could be fixed, because messing around with the views.lua breaks the integrity check.

6 months ago, they said that they have aknowledged their mistakes, that they wanna go full steam to finish all three modules. No serious updates for the Harrier since 4 months. Razbam is teasing the Mig-23 on facebook and says that it is "coming along quite nicely". Build your own opinion.

Sad to hear, but thank you very much for the information and trying!

Its a new aircraft to land. As i have been most time on max. trap weight, the ddifference is now enormous! Thx for fixing!

Ok, thx, good to know :thumbup:

Will it ever added? :-/

So have the team been able to reproduce it with the provided track files and investigate further?

Unfortunately, still present. Any news on that topic?

Yes, flying in VR.

Still not fixed, problem still present. Any news about it?

Count me in :thumbup:. I'll take the half of the cost :smilewink:

I can't understand the DCS community. "Everybody" is upset because modules do not get finished and stay in EA forever with bugs known for years, but if you have a poll to decide if a Dev should fix bugs, add a new feature or work on the next module, most votes are for working on the next module. We customers are full resonsible on our own for all those things we are upset about and it seems that we don't deserve it other. RagnarDa, sorry, don't want to hijack your thread. Its a great idea doing what you offer. Both thumbs up :thumbup:.

Any info if that is also under investigation? Still present in the actual OB.

Jester is still missing since months in his menu, will he ever come back or did we do something terrible to him?

Wenn ihr über optische Erscheinubgsbilder oder Aufwand für das Modul sprecht, habt ihr euch schon mal das Video mit dem TGP angesehen? Ausserdem glaub ich dass das Ding noch ein viel tiefgründigeres, fliegendes Serverrack als die F-18 ist. Ich wäre vorsichtig mit voreiligen Schlüssen welche rein auf der Optik des Cockpits gründen.

The VR headset tracks even the smallest movement of your head and the FOV is nearly double of that cropped in the video. You won't recognize any kind of wobbling while playing. BTW: In youtube, you can go frame by frame with the "," and "." key. If you do that on my video, especially on the written time codes in post nr 226, you'll see that the wing sweep indicator is always on the same spot, and that everytime you see the flaps and slats indicator, that those are also fully retracted. My initial post with the video had only the intention to clean up the wrong thing about bomb mode and that it is not true that wingsweep, flaps and slats are makeing problems when refueling in auto.

Wahrscheinlich weil sie mehr Priorität auf das Abschießen von Yankees zu einem günstigen Preis gelegt haben, als auf hübsches Aussehen ;).

That wobbling is normal when you record it trough a VR headset. I guess you still don't understand what I try to say. It doesn't matter if the wings are at 20° or 22°. Or if the flaps are extended or not. When you are doing AAR correct, you are changing speeds not more then 5, maximal 10kts. You won't notice any difference in wing sweep, even the computer would set it from 21° to 22°. In my video, you can't see any movement of the wing sweep indicator. Also no movement on the flaps and slats indicator. Show me a video of AAR, where it is done correct, where the wing sweep or flaps/slats are moving during the approach and taking fuel. That's impossible, because you are not changing the altitude and not really change speed. If you feel more comfortable to refuel with 40°, keep doing it. But its just not true that wing sweep, slats and flaps are causing problems when refueling in Auto. Its with Auto as easy/hard as it is with 40° (in DCS). Just another flight profile / characteristic to learn. In Auto, it just reacts more to wrong inputs on the throttle, thats what most people are misinterpreting as wing sweep, slats or flaps movement. The key is to fly in formation, being perfectly trimmed and do it with patence and minor speed differences. Then it will also work flawless and without any stress in Auto mode. (My video proofs that, even while flying a circle pattern)

Wing sweep indicator is visible the whole time. No movement. 2:22 -> Flaps & Slats up 3:01 ongoing to 3:19 -> Flaps & Slats up Don't know why anything should move overall. Change in speed is maybe around 5 kts over the whole refueling procedere... If someone has problems with the cat AAR (no matter if Auto or 40°), I can offer to fly together for training purpose. Some things are easier when someone helps you...

In those range you are changeing the speed during approach and refueling, the wings are not moveing a single degree. Watch my video on the page before. Was done in Auto. No wing / slats / flaps movement. Or could you provide a video of refueling where you can show that the wings and /or slats & flaps are moving? If you follow the rules (fly in formation, trim hands free, approach slow) that should not be a problem.