viper2097

Awesome, great to hear! Thank you :thumbup:.

Meinte natürlich einen long press. Der geht nicht. 1x TMS down bringt mich in den vertical scan. 2x TMS down muss ich probieren.

Whatever which TWS mode may have its details, the video is good to show what I'm talking about and that the actual TWS behavor in the Mirage just can't be correct. If you find any HUD tapes of a TWS'ed contact of a M2K, feel free to share with us.

Ja, gebe dir da recht. Allerdings hat HB mit dem gerade veröffentlichen statement für mich vieles gut gemacht und definitive deadlines gesetzt. Also sehen wir uns mal Q4 an...

Ich glaub nach wie vor dass wir am Thema vorbeidiskutieren. Nach wie vor vermute ich, dass niemand (99%) ein Problem mit EA hat. Denn das sollte jeder wissen was er da kauft. Womit aber immer mehr Leute ein Problem haben, ist wie mittlerweile mit EA umgegangen wird. Habe ich ein Problem dass bei der F-16 keine Aussenbeleuchtung funktioniert, oder bei der F-18 xy fehlt? Nein, denn an beiden wird ja aktiv entwickelt und weitergearbeitet. Das ist die Definition von EA. Habe ich ein Problem damit dass der Harrier ein Jahr lang komplett liegengelassen wurde weil man sich mal eben dazu entschloss ein anderes Modul zu entwickeln? Ja, sehr wohl. Denn das ist Täuschung / Verarsche am Kunden. Wir sollten also vielleicht nicht darüber diskutieren ob EA gut oder schlecht ist, sondern darüber wie die Entwickler mit EA umgehen und was wir als Kunden dazu beitragen / verlangen können.

I highly appreciate this open form of communication. Maybe not always is everything working perfect, as expected or different people just have different expectations. But there is only one thing, that is maybe the most important to stick all together: Communication You are doing a great job on that. Thanks, keep on going.

Honestly Decoy, I reflected myself and thought about what you said. I must admit that I don't think you are correct. I may moan and complain, but it is not the only thing I do and I'm afraid that you have ever thought about why I'm so negative biased to Razbam. Beside some really interesting discussion, and also helping other users when they have problems, I report bugs when I find them. Do you want some examples?: M2K/TWS - STT bug on the Mirage M2K/PCA select not working after HOTAS Gun/Mag Ok, those two are from today. What about older ones? M2K/HOTS functions wrong -> Reported on 17.05.2019. 5 months ago. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. M2K/Contact tanker not possible -> Reported on 14.02.2019. Fixed two weeks later, but not a single reaction from you or Razbam. AV8B/ External lights wrong -> Reported on 30.08. Replied on 04.09. that you'll forward that. No single informationa bout an aknowledgement, status or anything else since then. AV8B/ TPod tracks and lases while masked -> Reported on 11.05.2019. 5 months ago. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ Waypoints shown as 0.0 -> Reported on 23.08.2019. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ No "." when entering a frequency -> Reported on 20.09.2019. Three days later you asked for a track file (what I can't understand, but ok). People posted how to replicate it, I asked if yous till need a track file. No more reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ Agm-122 indicator wrong -> Reported on the 20.09.2019. Known since ever. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ Wrong NOZ values in NRAS page -> Reported on the 19.09.2019. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ Ejections eat works unarmed -> Reported on the 19.09.2019. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. AV8B/ RWR works even turned off -> Reported on the 04.02.2019. 8 months ago. No reaction from you or Razbam until yet. So let me summarize: I have reported 12 bugs so far. On two bugs have been a reaction from you. One was that you'll pass it to the team, the other was that you need a track file. One of this bugs have been fixed. And that have been only the bugs that I have reported. Not yet started to count all other bugs I'm affected also. And I'm not yet talking about any lies or empty promises that have been made. So, maybe as community manager, you would also like to re-think about your comment, that all I do is only complaining and moaning?

Ich bin mit der aktuellen Entwicklung bei HB auch alles andere als zufrieden, aber dieser post lässt mich mal wieder äusserst positiv in die Zukunft blicken. Mal sehen was Q4 nunwirklich für die Viggen bringt.

So, two months later, I still would like to know if that issue will be adressed?

Since ever, the TWS lock is tracking a target as good as a STT lock. Altough the TWS does not trigger a CL warning. I brought this up first time two months ago, here is the discussion. To explain it again: In STT, the radar is all the time looking at the target. Thats why, you get a real time, absolute smooth lock of the target on the HUD, and also on the radar screen. We all know that, because that is the mode where you fire Fox 1 missiles. In TWS, or LTWS, or SAM mode, a target is tracked, but the radar still sweeps up and down, and to the left and right as it does in RWS. (not sure, but I guess the M2K radar then only sweeps left to right, so it goes to a 1bar scan) So you do not get a real time designation of the target on the HUD and the radar screen. The designation only gets updated when the radar sweeps over the target. So the track on the HUD and also the radar screen will be very stuttering and, mostly never be on spot. There may be different mode of TWS, where the movement of the tracked target is also calculated and predicted, but if the target is manouvering, it must always be off. I made a video for better understanding: tHWc4og0DmI I know these are hard words, but I would already consider that behavior cheating. Especially in a PvP enviroment. As DCS is a simulation, please aknowledge that bug and fix as soon as possible. Thanks.

Selecting 530 on the PCA and then switch with HOTAS to Gun or Mag. When switching back to PCA, the 530 is no longer selected (nothing selected on the HUD), but there is still the S shown on the 530 button on the PCA. 530 needs to be de-selected and then selected again.

Ja, natürlich habe ich den eingeschalten.

Aktuell zwei Dinge: - Ich höre keine audio Warnungen? Z.B. der Alarm während des FBW tests beim Hochfahren, oder wenn der G-limiter in der falschen Position ist. - Beim Zurückschalten von HOTAS Gun oder HOTAS Mag auf PCA (wenn vorher S530 selektiert wurde), dann ist aktuell nichts mehr selektiert (obwohl 530 noch im PCA ausgewählt ist). Man muss dann 530 ab, und wieder auswählen. Kann diese zwei Dinge jemand bestätigen?

Mal zusammengefasst was mir bis jetzt als bug / not complete / etc. aufgefallen ist: - Ungültige ILS Frequenz (z.B. nicht auf der Karte vorhanden) eingeben -> CTD - Steerpoints können noch nicht eingegeben werden - TGP slaved immer einen Steerpoint mit (k.A. ob das realistisch ist) - TGP kann ohne Steerpoint nicht richtig verwendet werden (schaut irgendwo hin, k.A. ob das realistisch ist, egal ob man einen neuen auswähltm, oder gar keinen gespeichert hat) - Im Dogfight Modus wird nicht automatisch die Aim-9 ausgewählt. - Man kann nicht mit dem NWS button zwischen Aim-9 und Aim-120 wechseln. - Cooling wird bei der Aim-9 nicht automatisch ausgewählt. - ILS Linien am HUD bleiben immer da, egal ob ILS ein oder ausgeschalten ist. - IFF fehlt noch komplett - AAR ist gerade ein einziger bug. - HTS fehlt noch - Harms fehlen noch - Mavericks fehlen noch - Centerline Tank fehlt noch Klingt jetzt nach viel, aber eigentlich bin ich für den Release Tag ganz zufrieden. Klar Mission-ready ist sie bei weitem noch nicht, aber das wird schon werden. Ich mag das Ding :). Andere Frage: Wenn ich den Dogfight Modus auswähle, dann ist ja das Radar ausgeschalten. Mit TMS Fwd schalte ich auf borsight, mit TMS rgt auf "HUD scan" und mit TMS aft auf vertical scan. Kann ich irgendwie das Radar auch wieder ausschalten ohne den Dogfight Modus ab, und wieder neu anzuwählen?

So, jetzt hab ich endlich mal kapiert wie RWS/SAM und die ACM modes funktionieren, inkl. dem Dogfight und missle override switch und auch dem JHMCS... Eigentlich ne ganz coole Sache wenn man mal dahintergestiegen ist :). Hoffe dass noch das Umschalten zwischen Aim-9 und Aim-120 mittels des Missile Step buttons möglichst bald integriert wird. Finde ich irgendwie logischer und "einfacher" als mit anderen Modulen wenn man mal dahinter gestiegen ist. Aber gut, is halt immer fraglich wie man das direkt vergleichen kann / könnte.

Is the TWS behavor now correct on the HUD and not as smooth as in STT anymore? Haven't tried it yet, but on the patch before it was still, altough the radar itself now shows the target correctly updated on the HDD.

So, four months later, still no comment from Razbam?

Of course, if that is your opinion, then it is fine for me. And all that below is fine for you? In your opinion, you think your customers does not have any reason for complaining and moaning?

So you seem to know well enough where the negative reputation for Razbam is coming from... I'm not trolling, I would love to see improvements as I love those aircrafts... I've reported more then enough bugs which Razbam is ignoring as they do with all other reported bugs. So its up to Razbam to show some action.

Unfortunately, yes it is. As i love the Mirage and Harrier, I'm very sad that it is like that. But as community manager, you should know way more then good enough, why it is as it is. Or do you need a link to 99% of the bug report threads which are just ignored by Razbam? Some of them for even more then a year? Or should I link to the discussion about releasing a new module while one is still bugged and another is far, far, far away from being finished? Or should I link to the discussion where we have been told lies (again) about different teams coding on different aircrafts?

I accept it that you have your opinion, that others have their opinion and that I have mine. As we are talking about opinions and feelings, there is maybe no right, wrong or things we can get in letters to compare. I accept it also that your opinion may be other then mine. Please do also the same without offending me. Thank you.

Honestly, IRL pilots needs to be taken with care. Most of them are seeing simulators like DCS as nothing more then a neat toy. And then, they are completely positive blinded that THEIR jet is in THAT game. So it MUST be awesome. I'd guess they would need to have sim experience since ever and played their module for more then 100h to get a real useable feedback.

As your signature says, you are a Mirage fanatic. That maybe makes you blind to any critizm against your beloved Mirage. I'm not alone with my opinion that RB modules are lacking completely the "feeling" and "life" in their flight model. However, those are things that can't be found in any tables or objective discussions. So its pointless to discuss about feelings. The F-16 and the F-18 are also other FBW modules we have, and wow, both actually feel like I'm awaiting it. And again, many people are saying the same. But again, its feelings and that can't be judged. Believe, the Mirage is an awesome plane and I love it. So I'm not happy to point on any shortcomings (as you may think I enjoy).

We know both that we have different opinions on that, and that a discussion about "feeling" does not make any sence.

Tatsächlich? Siehst, so kann einem das Gefühl täuschen :).