Jump to content

Viking 1-1

Members
  • Posts

    443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Viking 1-1

  1. Best SEAD in DCS right now is the JF-17. Far far ahead of the others...
  2. I can. Takes practice, though. There is a reason why real pilots have to practice as well...
  3. Ok, vielen Dank! Dann mach ich mich mal ans testen!
  4. Das habe ich versucht, bekomme es aber nicht richtig hin. Hab am Missionsstart Flag 1 = 0 und dann "Einheiten in Zone gleich Flag 1 = 1" eingestellt, weiß aber net wie ich die Flag = 1 in den anderen Trigger bekomme... Das würde aber au bedeuten, dass wenn eine Einheit fehlt, der Trigger nicht auslöst, richtig? Kann ja au sein, dass es auf dem Weg zu der Triggerzone schon Verluste gibt. Dann würde der Trigger ja nicht auslösen, oder irre ich mich da? Edit: Ah, warte. Wenn ich als für jede Einheit in der Zone und über 2500ft einzeln eingebe, sprich Unit 1 in Zone Unit 1 über 2500ft oder Unit 2 in Zone unit 2 über 2500ft oder ... Müsste es gehen, richtig?
  5. Servus zusammen, Ich bin gerade dabei etwas tiefer in den Missionseditor einzutauchen, hab aber für folgende Situation noch keine Lösung gefunden: Ich möchte dass eine SA Site aktiv wird, wenn die Maschinen in einer Triggerzone zu hoch fliegen. Folgendes hab ich schon gemacht: - SA Site platziert, späte Aktivierung - Triggerzone erstellt - Trigger mit dem Event "once", AGL above 2500ft für jede Maschine mittels "oder" , Aktivierung SA Site So würde ja aber die SAM Site aktiviert werden, egal wo die Maschinen über 2500ft gehen. Ich will ja aber, dass das nur in der Triggerzone passiert Wie kann ich denn eingeben, dass diese "2500ft überschritten, SAM geht an" nur in der Triggerzone passiert?
  6. Ah, got it. Thanks.
  7. What is the problem? If you dont like the stored alignment move the knob further for full alignment. Or what am I missing? :huh: If you dont like it, dont use it. Sounds pretty optional to me...
  8. The link above is just not helpfull. Usually, Mavericks should be next since they are delayed already. But we just dont know 100%. A real roadmap with planned release dates doesnt exist. Beside that, patience is next since the work on the Viper is moved mainly to 2021.
  9. I really love ED and DCS. But this gets so frustrating. Sad but true...
  10. Just dropped 4 GBU-12 at Persian gulf in ccrp. No issues.
  11. Now they edited the carrier in. Thanks god. :lol:
  12. All good… The changelog doesn´t say anythink about the carrier, but the update is called "open beta super carrier update"
  13. Never mind. Nothing to see here. Walk on...
  14. Is your DDI for the Mav "active" by pressing the Sensor Control Switch towards that DDI?
  15. This loadout isn't possible since you can't put BRM on the inner pylons...
  16. Is Deka fixed on Chinese and eastern Aircraft? I would love to see a F4 Phantom, and I think Deka would be the guys able to do it right! Still not happy that the Mudhen went to Razbam...
  17. I wouldn't bet on that one... for me it seems that for ED the case is closed, as soon as they marked it with "driver issue" Very disappointing that there is such a lack of support on this issue, since it seems to be from ED site. Hornet SA Page fps drop A10C SA Page fps drop JF17 SA Page runs fine Hornet is very limited at the moment, except you run old drivers, which should not how it should be...
  18. It's not a bug, it's a feature....
  19. Honestly, if you don't see that this module is worth it's full price then so be it. This is in my oppinion the best and most complete module around this time. And guess what: Developing takes money. This is Dekas first full module here and I happily pay the full price to support these guys. And to be honest: I paid full price for modules that were (and still are) far behind the Jeff regarding quality.
  20. Hey guys, Just wonder how you work around, that we have one radio less than other planes. Usually I have my Tactical tuned in, plus my inflight channel to coordinate with my flight members. But since we need on radio for the data link, I don't know how to proper deal with it. I have to stay on Tactical, that's for sure. But doing my inflight stuff on Tactical is not nice for the others around. Or do you guys fly without data link, which would be a huge deficit in my oppinion?
  21. No, it is not a stock mission. But yeah, your idea is quite good. I guess I built a mission and check the times with Tacview!
  22. Let's be honest: Where would we be without ED? There would be no other Sim like this! Do I like the delays and sometimes broken things? No, surely not. But do I still have a lot of fun when I'm flying with my mates with the Hornet? Hell yeah! So again thank you ED for all your effort. 2020 will be a pretty f**** up year for a lot of us and many things won't work out as planned. But no matter what, I can still escape reality for a couple of hours playing your awesome sim. Thanks for that. I will remain a backer of you guys, no matter what. You brought my hobby to the next level.
  23. Hey guys, I have a question regarding SEAD flights. I found the Information once, but now I can´t find it anymore. Is there a Chart that give me aprox. time to Impact from SAM sites if I´m "weaseling" on their outer Limits? Example given: I´m flying on the outer ring of a SA-10 site on 25.000ft to draw their attention on me and away from other flight members. Now I see the SAM launch at me. How many seconds do I have to do a defensive manouver? After how many seconds would the defensive manouver most effective?
  24. Hast du den Knopf im rechten Bedienfeld im Avionics Panel für den Pod angemacht? Der ist nicht bei "Combat" automatisch mit drin... "CLDP" heißt der Schalter, obere Reihe, glaub der dritte von links.
×
×
  • Create New...