Viking 1-1

Did you enable the auto handoff? Otherwise you have to manually lock the Mav on the WPN page

Yes. Mav Power on screws the NAV Data on the EHSI

Since this occurs during my "missions" my trackfiles are way too long for ED. But I think I´m not the only one having these issues...

Issues I encountered so far: - Mav prefer buildings over vehicles when trying to lock something, makes it very hard to attack something inside a city - PRE mode doesn´t work for more than one attack, after that Pod and Mav dont align anymore - AUTO handoff in PRE mode unreliable - Turning on MAV screws up your navigation on your EHSI - Slewcontrol of the Mav in VIS or BORE is way too sensitive

Spudknocker mentioned in his video a simple trick would be the MSL Step Button...

Will try that, thanks.

Fell on that as well... Was flying around in Syria, searching for some Sam's when it was getting darker.. And I was like "why aren't my nvgs working?!" Because the Nvgs are back at base... :-D

I had problems with the "pre mode" as well. First attack works without any problems, but from the second run on the mav and the tpod dont align anymore. You can see it in the HUD as well, that tpod is looking (and locking) somewhere else as the Mav.

Pre mode with tpod worked fine for me. Maybe check Wags video again to be sure you dont miss anything.

Nice! Looking forward to it!

Were you not able to include the list for this OB or not able to include the HARM?:cry:

This.

The issue is that CCRP with designating a Target of opportunity is simply broken. You can not designate a CCRP Target that is not in line of sight of your Hud with the actual Steerpoint. Only "Workaround" would be to use the coordinates of the target and enter them as a new Steerpoint. Then you can use that point for your Ccrp.

Of course not. This is the internet. There are always people "who think they know better", no matter what... :music_whistling:

No, never! It is a sim and it is a good one. So Im not using any shortcuts...:smilewink:

Wow. Amazing price. So I guess i have to see how to start a A 10 again...

This! I own the Harrier and I was like "Ok, it is not complete, but it is still nice." Now learning that it is in fact "complete" feels like April fools! I considered the Mudhen as a Day 1 purchase but seeing now how Razbam deals with this (no response in the forums, even on this thread) shows me that Razbam doesnt give a f*** about their products and, even worse, about their customers. So no more Razbam modules for me. And to be honest: This does not only damage the reputation of Razbam, it also damages the reputation of DCS in general. I hope ED is aware of this as well.

Schade um die F15. Hatte mich riesig auf das Modul gefreut, und gehofft, dass Razbam mit dem Harrier die Kurve bekommt und sich ändert. Leider nein. Also keine F15 für mich.

Och, seit gestern ist der Harrier doch "out of EA" und "Feature complete". Wird nicht lang dauern, bis man die Mudhen vorbestellen kann. Kann also losgehen mit dem nächsten, Top supporteten Modul von Razbam

But how do you get a proper "ccrp solution" then and recognize if your target that you have chosen with the TPod is really "tracked"? And how do you know when and where to pickle? I don't get a bomb fall line, neither a time to release for GBU if I'm in CCRP and trying to attack a target of opportunity that is not near a Steerpoint. Would be nice if you could "walk me through the procedure" because obviously I'm doing something wrong. Help is much appreciated.

Try to designate a target that is not pre-planned with a steerpoint for a CCRP attack and you will understand. Nothing to do with "mixing up with the Hornet Tpod"....

Hope they fix it soon. So annoying. I guess I quit playing until there is a fix. Just not enjoyable that we dont even have proper working CCRP at the moment.

Just push sp for Snowplow mode and you are looking forward.

As the others already said: In your menu on the DED you only change the code for the laser. You must seperatly change the code for your bombs. This is done with the kneeboard.

They work well for me, so they are implemented