Jump to content

falcon_120

Members
  • Posts

    2104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by falcon_120

  1. Bump come on ED! Do something [emoji1][emoji3166] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  2. Bump, im so eagerly awaiting some basic improvements to AWACS comms. If just we had something like that other old sim with F16s.... [emoji3166][emoji848] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  3. Yes, but in my experience the rings are quite right for modern SAMS like SA11/SA10 when going high. If you dont enter that ring you are good, and even if shot at a slight turn will defeat the missiles, so its lets you know a pretty decent “safe zone” Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. Yeah, rings are not very meaningful without context, in this case altitude. The ring is a good approximation as long as you fly towards the SAM, but launch range increase dramatically with altitude (and other factor described by previous posters). A SA11 that will happily launch at you at 22nm if you are ate 30k will wait until 10/12ish if you are flying at 5000ft. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  5. The new VOIP by ED has 2 modes, one is room mode and radio/channel mode (i might be remembering the name wrong). Room mode is what you ask for, everyone on the samecoalition will communicate as if they were in the same frequency. On the second mode OTOH you need to individually select the correct frequency to hear other players using the module radios to tune the proper channel, or change freq as needed for other comms (eg. tankers, Magic, OCAs, strykers....), but obviously you need some previous coordination to define those frequencies. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  6. Isnt the AI issue an ED thing? I was not aware Razbam could do any change to how AI behaves, even when that AI is a F15e? Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  7. As mentioned many times before, people complains on the hornet radar comes from a not fully fleshed implementation of MSI by ED. Had we the full implementation you would never change the TWS Auto mode during BVR once the sorting phase has finalized since: The hornet should be able to designate outbound tracks without the radar needing to detect them first If you select an outbound track with the radar in TWS Auto, the radar automatically centers on that contact You can do that for contacts outside of your TWS azimuth
  8. The FPS and overall experience of smoothness is a bit better and this is due to how well the Meta Asynchronous Spacewarp works, better than the OXR implementation i was using with My reverb G2. I have it set to 72hz with ASW on and the experience is great. Now on the clarity side, the summary of it would be "its a tiny little less clear (resolution wise) than the reverb G2 on the very center but it's like that across the whole lense". And boy... I love it, I do feel like in the whole picture the experience is much better. I do spot target on my peripheral view i couldn't before, i can read instruments and MFD on the sides without moving the head, just the eyes... I could not do that before with the G2, at least for me outside the sweetspot all was a blurry mess. I also do like the colours a bit more. And the passtrough is amazing. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  9. Quest 3 is an amazing option, i love the change from my G2,cannot go back to non pancake lenses. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  10. Im really looking forward to something. I know ED is tieing this to the bigger datacartridge implementation, but its taking soooo long that it would have been convenient to at least have a CMS menu in the special option menu of each module to allow this customization before implementing that as part of a bigger functionality. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  11. I dont like the idea a lot. As bad as i would love the F15c and would support any 3rd party that would engage in that task financially, i think a good module needs to steam from the love and true interest of a 3rd party rather that from an auction to the best bidder. An unknown 3rd party that accepts doing that just because there is a good chunk of money to start is a recipe for disaster. Doing the minimum to meet whatever initial promise is in the Crowdfunding. Now if we have the luck of a good trustworthy 3rd party taking the mission and they decide to open a CF to support the investment..., then I'm in. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  12. Where? If its where i think (MSFS), for me that cant categorize as "its already there somewhere else", its normally just a 3D, a HUD, basic navigation and a poorly matched flight model. By those standards we already have a nice MOD in DCS. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  13. Eurofighter does not use a PESA radar, it uses a traditional mechanical array radar, the ECR90, an advance version of the ferranti blue vixen used by the harrier FA2. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  14. Not 2024 based on my feelings from news shared on interviews and attention to detail of HB on their modules that always extends a bit initial estimations. A strong contender for 2025. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  15. I don't think you need to change between RWS/TWS for the bars to be changed, at least that I can recall, but i'll check, my memory is clumsy. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  16. How would you save a game in MP? :/ What happens with other players? are they substituted by Bots when you decide to play again in 2 days? Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  17. Well i would love a mirage 2000-5/-9 or even mirage 2000N. Thats a 4th gen fighter with TGP and Fox3 with probably more accesible documentation. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  18. No, it can be cursor selected not bumped, but the SET function is your friend. Beginning of each flight I usually assign 2BAR scan at the Amraam, 4BAR or 6 BAR depending on the mission to the Sparrow and 6BAR scan to the Aim9, that way if i need to quickly change BAR settings i just select the appropiate weapon, once i have the contact in STT or TWS AUTO i switch back to the weapon i need. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  19. the Save game news was gold to my ears. So many enjoyable mission i just dont play due to lack of time, now if i could save it and play as i have some spare time... now we're talking Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  20. You can buy it now, however YOU CANNOT FLY IT yet :). BR, Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  21. Hello again, Please see the attached tracked, against non maneuvering target frontal aspect: Tone at 22nm on frontal non AB target !! Tone is lost at 17nm and regained at around 15nm Tone is lost again at around 9nm until 6nm!! Tone is mantained from 6nm until the end The main point here is that i consistently get tone on frontal aspect target at more thant 15nm and i consistenly loose the lock in a window that goes from around 12-15 nm until around 7nm, this makes no sense to me IF: 1-Target do not change relative aspect to me 2-Target do not go into reheat/AB 9xbug2.miz.trk
  22. Hi Lord Vader, Thanks for the feedback, however please, let me add some additional tracks that could better define the problem in case you would reconsider, its very strange to me that i consistently get a tone on a front target at more than 12nm but fail to do it at closer ranges? POS: I will add them as soon as i'm back home.
  23. As per attached track: -Getting tone starting at around 14nm up until 10nm -When closer of 10nm you loose tone until almost 4 nm -Sun is not obstructing the view -At around 3 nm you get tone but uncaging the seeker does not get a lock Finally this is totally reproducible, i always get a missile tone around 12-15ish nm just to wait to better parameters just to find you cannot get a tone until well inside 4nm even on a beaming target on Afterburner... 9xbug.miz.trk
  24. [emoji106][emoji106][emoji16][emoji102] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...