Jump to content

falcon_120

Members
  • Posts

    2104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by falcon_120

  1. So thrilled by the upcoming changes to A/A radars. Amazing steps towards a more realistic simulation. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  2. Hey all, I'm looking for some recommendations in order to improve the vibility of the JHMCS during day time. I would appreciate any mod or trick compatible with MP play (IC compliant) Maybe is the lack of contrast of my reverb G2 LCD pannels but as soon as I have any normal sunny day or even some cloudy days, it get really difficult to see the JHMCS symbology against white or green background (JHMCS turned all the way up) Regards, Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  3. For me the main reason is the lack of a FF F15C and SU27. If i had those i would not touch FC3 i think, maybe some weird day when i want to fly a SU25 or Mig29 but that about it. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  4. It should arrive on October 12th, stay tuned! Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  5. I've ordered it. I will report back whether it improves the dcs experience of the reverb g2 i currently own. If not i will return it. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  6. Care to expand a bit more? As far as i understood most people testing the Meta Quest pro on DCS are reporting a net improvement over the reverb G2 (I'm a reverb G2 owner) specially due to the pancake lenses. I was under the impression that the Quest 3 slightly improve the quet Pro in resolution while keeping the pancakes lenses. So, my question is, shouldn't I consider as an improvement over my reverb G2? Regards,
  7. Can any of you confirm if there would be any reason to pick the 512gb version over the basic one if DCS is the only use that the visor will have?
  8. After more than 4 years of EA we still don't have that special options for the hornet. Maybe Razbam will listen more that ED do in this specific topic. +1 Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  9. Maybe a tacview&track test showing the turn rate achieved would be a good point to identify odd behaviors. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  10. I really think DCS is taking too long to add a FC3 level of some of the latest flankers (su27sm, su30 at least), in fact they are more than 20 years old already and operatives around the globe. A su30mki would be wonderful For other existing planes like the J11, ED is taking too long to give them Modern chinese fox 3 like the PL12. Thanks god several servers;including DDCS as a not gamey example, are already bypassing this limitation and adding the PL12 to them. I like simulating modern scenarios and currently this is hard Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  11. I'm with you guys. I always tend to enjoy early access releases, and the joy of having systems added incrementally. I like a lot getting sneak peeks or videos of coming features, it kind of lets you learn the systems in a more digestive way. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  12. since one or two patches I'm seeing a lot how not supporting the amraam till pitbull results in missiles not magically picking target with a 40g turn and actually missing the "basket". It feels so much more realistic, might be placebo though, nothing scientific in my testing methodology (1 or 2 setups everynow and then) Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  13. You are not getting the point of the previous poster. In RL there is a BVR time-line you strictly follows based on the mission. The range is not about knowing where bandits will be, but about knowing at which range you commit or abort, if you commit you probably either go to TWS or even STT for greater accuracy, but you'll have a sorted target asigned and you are just not changing scan/azimuth settings at that time, that would happen before to know how many groups or bandits you are engaging. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  14. Sorry, i didnt ever test this again on the latest patch, this past 2 month i have barely had any opportunity to play DCS. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  15. I dont have a proof since its not me saying this is correct. BR, Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  16. it's correct. Apparently not a thing for that model/block of the ANG F16 or so it says ED. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  17. Even better, can we have a simple menu in special options to edit the CMS like the JF17 one? So we dont have to mess around with text files? I know it will come eventually with the Data cardrige of some planes, but thats so far away id rather have this simple option in the game menu. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  18. In that we totally agree. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  19. Indeed, but we should not forget either what current missiles turning capabilities are nowadays, they are really eyewatering. So its a case of train as if you need it, but if they fire at you one of those beasts its over. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  20. Yes, Its with Auto acquisition switch Press IICR, but you need to have boxed a CDES option in the TPOD before you can achieve a PTRK.
  21. I would say that the F15EX will be a huge BVR platform, but not in the sense of the classical BVR concept most people have. We are now entering a realm of BVR where sensors are more relevant that pure kinetics and maneuverability. The F15ex has all the known advantages in AESA radars including Electronic attack cappabilities, it will simply try to blind enemy fighters, it will have a massive detection range thanks to higher output power and latest AESA developments, it will have a super advance Self protection suite, it has massive processing power compared to legacy platform, letting her act as a sensor fusion platform, and finally it has very very good shiny new engines, so the kinectic are defintely there, just not the most important aspect IMHO. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  22. Well I wouldn't say that as when thinking in a A10c. The F15E definetely can hold it's ground in a contested airspace as it has: -the stick(120c) and radar to hit you before you come close -the speed to get away if jumped And not now but soon: -JTIDS to have a battles pace picture of baddies coming it's way. -Aim9x to make you pay if you dare to underestimate it close. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  23. A hornet with Aim120c is a formidable platform in Bvr, even with his always screamed lack of speed. But you can be alright if you learn the basic Bvr principles applicable to all fighters: -Make a proper SA assessment first -Launch you missiles high to give them proper range -defend low -Learn the MAR of your missiles and the enemy's -Crank to support -Crank to launch if required from close -learn to disengage -learn to notch -get a wingman or allies to support. -rebuild SA as much as you need(if you loose it with the amazing L16) Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  24. Do you need more than M2.1 for anything? [emoji3166] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
  25. Special menu options for TDC speed sensibility and other quality of life aspects should be the norm going forward to compensate for the great variety of setups out there, from very low end to 1:1 replicas. +1 on this. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...