ALDEGA

http://www.urbandictionary.com is an excellent source for this kind of question. It even lists IBTL ;)

As far as I know, ED had nothing todo with the "FC Gold cd-rom" release. If there was a fiasco, it was not due to them.

Courtesy, please. LOL ...

If ... they can dig up the wings ;)

"The Battle Simulator"? Who knows. Clouds and sky looked similar, but so do most flightsims with "simple" sky ;)

The biggest problem with copy-protection-systems such as Starforce is that they work through "virtual" drivers or other shady mechanisms. This makes compatibility wither future OS's shaky at best. Just look at the x64 versions of Windows (XP and Vista). An update of Starforce is required, otherwise it doesn't work. In the meanwhile, 10 year-old games with simple cd-checks work without a hitch ... Just imagine that Starforce went bankrupt a year ago, then there wouldn't be a Vista update... and the games would not work. Then you have to rely on the game's publisher/developer to issue a new version with another copy-protection-system (that works) ...

Just prod Chizh, he'll give in after a while :D

Actually, Fokker's implementation for gun synchronization used a patented system. He refused to acknowledge this, even after several court rulings (see the Wikipedia article) :D

... I certainly don't... Anyway, how about some information we don't know yet? A special new feature, an undocumented improvement? Surely, there must be something.

It was a correct statement.

I believe this was already solved during WWI. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupter_gear

After all these years, I can't recall how many times I've seen this thread.

I voted option 1 but do wonder when GG will push something that is NOT in favor of his NATO aircraft ;)

This is known.

http://www.turbosquid.com/FullPreview/Index.cfm/ID/240552/SID/274412/blFP/1 Just 1 million polygons! Too much? :D

Chizh was quite clear about this. Only "first-class" models will be accepted to become "integrated" in LockOn.

I didn't go through all pages of this thread, so it may already have been reported: the refuel hatch animation is missing as of yet

It's a common response from FF: meaningless, a waste of space

Excellent.

How many triangles is that model? ;-)

lol, predictable

Well, there must be two arguments for the movement of the Shkval camera, as this is implemented for the Su-25T. Maybe these 2 arguments are also "called" by LockOn for other aircraft. I'm afraid not though. :( Request for ED? ;) I guess the head-movement args can be used to simulate helmet-mode targetting.

The front landing gear doesn't appear to be "correct": screenshot (WIP) picture The "quarter-circle-supporting-the-landing-gear-tyre-thingy" should be on the other side (left instead of right).

Like so?

all of the above and "more atmosphere"