antiload

No pilot model, no manual, a few bugs such as some weapons and the tpod. Also, a possibility of a new weapon such as the CM400 cruise missile (although I read this has been ruled out).

DCS is fantastic but jez, the AI wingmen are lame. I'm thinking the AI will need to improve for the dynamic campaign. Thoughts?

I've been playing the JF17 tonight and the HUD is showing. I did an automatic cold start in SP

The problem with this missile is exactly the same as the CM802AKG on the JF17. Great missile, unfortunately unusable.

Note: the current launcher is limited to 3 pre-sets. Thanks for you input

Hi, I've just started using VR on the Meta Quest. The game is running well, however, I've noticed that raindrops are not appearing on my canopy in all jets. I noticed that the option in the settings under VR automatically turns to OFF. Isthis a bug? Or am I doing something wrong- thanks

I Love the JF17. It's core has many innovative features such as canopy freezing, and data cartridge. However, some of the AG weapons need a fix and my tpod sometimes is not ground stabilising, even though I'm within parameters.

Allow AI to be overriden. For example, AI in CAS/SEAD mission seem to determine their own priorities rather than doing what they're told to do, to complete the action/mission. It would actually make the AI act more intelligently if it just carried out what was asked of it.

Hi, did this fix the tpod issue in AG. I'm still having an issue locking the ground at the waypoint even though i'm within parameters.

I too think a routing waypoints system for both ship launched and aircraft launched cruise missiles should really be implemented. It's difficult with their current straight line configuration to avoid geographical features and as you say SAM sites that will just take them out. Please ED add this feature, it will make this already amazing sim, fantastic.

I'd prefer this locking method to be optional. It's so labour intensive. Just give the option for real procedure or already done. It would be great.

Tbf, the AKG hasn't been usable for sometime. It doesn't bear down on target, and generate ground textures, and for a mitl missile you'd certainly need 20/20 vision to make out a target

Now that the CM-400 missile has been discovered in DCS (and is playable, but not refined) can we expect this to be added to the jet? Note: REDFOR are in need of some stand-off aircraft ordinance

Thank you CH, I will give this work around a go. Thank you for all you do for this community I have yet to find a way to add custom assets to the HTS table. But you can do it manually in flight. Just press LIST, 0, E and enter the HARM ID from the table at my site (for example 528 for the LTAMDS radar). Then go into HTS and choose Threat and select MAN for manually. The HTS will then find your custom ID and you can select the target. Since I'm going by memory, forgive me if I got a button name wrong.

TOR not showing in F16 HAD. Hello CH. Just a little heads up that the TOR does not show up on the F16 HAD or MFD. The warning code 15 shows on the RWR. I tested with your models and the ED TOR, which shows up in the HAD. Miz file attached & screen shots Most southern TOR is the ED version - All TORs set to RED STATE/Weapons hold. ED TOR M2 MK2 M2M TOR test.miz

I too struggle with AI aircraft. They seem to have a built-in priority to-do-list based around the objective you give them. For example a SEAD mission, they will attack the first radar/SAM site they come to, then scour the map for other RADAR emitters. They will fly into threat rings without any fear. CAS is the same. I have managed to correct some of this AI behaviour but it's fiddley and difficult to remember how to set up the commands. I wish the AI action was simplified and would do what it says on the tin. I would be a lot less time consuming and you could go into a mission with a lot more confidence that your AI will preform to what you require from them.

I'm having the same problem with mark points in the F18. Marked and when assigned they are yards off the mark point.

Submunitions can be effected by wind. Try a test without any wind. In other aircraft you get WCM (wind correcting munitions) and radar homing submunitions. It may be down to that. Otherwise it could be a core miscalculation bug.

I take your points. Obviously it would be essential if ED produce a SP campaign. As for SP missions i guess an option to remove the ATC or a version where it simply informs you what runway to take off from would be good.

I love DCS and appreciate all the passion and dedication from the ED team. However, for a game trying to be realistic (look at the tedious maverick missile procedure for the F16), it's rather embarrassing to have such a lame "ATC procedure". It goes from giving request to take-off to request denied, to giving permission. It's so annoying. This for me should be a priority to implement a functioning ATC on airfields.

I also agree. It would save precious time to have to option to auto align/bore-sight the mavericks. or include it in the auto start procedure.

I found this thread relating to bore sighting the Mavs. I will test and mark as solution if correct.

Hi, F18 - Maverick F not hitting target. (Pre-mode) F16 - Maverick D/H not hitting chosen target - They seem to go for other target sources or don't hit at all. (Pre-mode) Please find miz & trk file for the F18 example. Thanks Mav test.trk Mav test.miz

Hi is this still on your radar? No pun intended