-
Posts
349 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by MrExplosion
-
Looking for documentations for the Ju-88 S-1/-3 G-1/-6
MrExplosion replied to Blackbird12's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
You were also searching for S-1 docs, right? Since it was only introduced at the end of 43 I guess this is either the first issue or a second issue with some corrections. G-1 and R-2 probably have their own manuals as they cover a different role as night hunters. Im not sure if you want to spend the money, but those exact manuals are available here: https://www.luftfahrt-archiv-hafner.de/junkers.htm I have never ordered from them, but the site seems up to date and the only other option that comes to my mind would be to travel to the Bundesarchiv and see the documents in person. So for 60 € you get (as a DVD or as a download) : Junkers Ju 88 A-4und Baureihen C, D, G, P, R, S und T Kompendium, gesamt6.350Seiten, bestehend aus: Ju 88 A-4, Flugzeug-Handbuch, D(Luft)T 2088 A-4, 1941 – 1943 Ju 88 A-4, Bedienungsvorschrift/Fl,LDvT 2088 A-4/Fl, 1942 Ju 88 A-4 trop, Tropenausrüstung, LDvT2088 A-4/Trop., 1941 Ju 88 A-4 und D-1,Schußwaffenanlage,LDvT 2088A-4 und D-1/Wa,1941 Ju 88 A-4, Ersatzteilliste, 1941 Ju 88 A-4, Allgemeine Geräteliste, 1943 Ju 88 A-4, Flugstrecken- und Rollweg-Tabelle, 1941 Ju 88 A-4, Gerät- und Sonderwerkzeug, 1941 Ju 88 A-4 und A-5, Änderungs-Anweisungsliste, 1943 Ju 88 A-4 und A-5, Grundausstattung, 1943 Ju 88 A-4 und A-14, Beladevorschrift, 1941 Ju 88 A, C und D, Prüfmittel-Zusammenstellung, 1942 Ju 88 A-16, Werkschrift, Flugzeug-Handbuch,1944 Ju 88 C-6, Flugzeug-Handbuch, D(Luft)T 2088 C-6,1942 Ju 88 C, Zerstörer-Entwicklung Ju 88 D-1, Flugzeug-Handbuch, Elektrisches Bordnetz, 1942 Ju 88 D-5, D-5 trop, Flugzeug-Handbuch. VDM-Luftschraubenanlage, 1942 Ju 88 D-5, D-5 trop, Bedienungsvorschrift/Fl.,1941 Ju 88 G-1, Flugzeug-Handbuch, Teil 12 A Schußwaffenanlage, 1943 Ju 88 G-1,Bed.-Vorschrift Schusswaffe,LDvT 2088 G-1/WA,1943 Ju 88 G-1, R-2, S-1, T-1 Bedienungsvorschrift-Fl, 1943 Ju 88 G-1, R-2, S-1, T-1 Bedienungsvorschrift-Fl, Sonderstoffanlage, 1944 Ju 88 G-2, G-6, S-3, T-3, Bedienungsvorschrift-Fl, 1944 Ju 88 P-1, Schußwaffenanlage, 7,5 cm Bordkanone, D(Luft)T2088 P, 1943 Ju 88 P-4, 5 cm Bordkanone und MG 81 Z, D(Luft)T 2088 P-4,1944 Ju 88 S-1, Flugzeug-Handbuch, Teil 12 D/G, Sondereinbauten, D(Luft)T 2088 S-1, 1944 Ju 88, Reparaturanweisungen, D(Luft)T2088A/Rep, 1943 Ju 88, Verzeichnis der JFM-Mittteilungen, 1941 - 1942 Ju 88, Betriebsmittel bei Grundüberholung, 1942 Ju 88, Drucköl-Anlage (Auszug), 1941 Ju 88, Oberflächenbehandlung, 1943 Ju 88, Fertigungsprüfung und Austauschbau, 1940 Ju 88, Lehrbildreihe, 1939 – 1941 Ju 88, Lehrvorträge 1942 – 1943 -
Looking for documentations for the Ju-88 S-1/-3 G-1/-6
MrExplosion replied to Blackbird12's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
You have a typo in there. It's called "Bedienvorschrift". That should make googling for the docs easier Here you can find the "Ju-88 G-1, R-2, S-1, T-1 Bedienungvorschrift-Fl, 1943" https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/attachments/ju-88s-1-pdf.68851/ -
This is really getting worse and worse in my experience. Might be a bit of bad luck as well, but I had my engine die 3 times yesterday in the span of 2 hours while flying on SoW. I made especially sure to warm up the engine correctly and not overstress it (knowing it is prone to just die now and then). Still it just fails seemingly randomly without any warning prior. This makes the Dora close to unusable in multiplayer.
-
No official skin template for the Dora?
MrExplosion replied to birkenmoped's topic in DCS: Fw 190 D-9 Dora
Yea, we can all guess what might happen in the future. Your guess is as good as mine. But I guess nothing will be done, since nothing was officialy communicated. And even the features that were announced officialy have disappeared into the void (looking at you F8/G8). -
No official skin template for the Dora?
MrExplosion replied to birkenmoped's topic in DCS: Fw 190 D-9 Dora
Not responding for years after years of people asking is their subtle way of telling us "No"... or rather a less friendly worded variant of No, given ignoring ones question is seen as rather rude by some people. -
Really great work! Thx @tigair! I have setup my own IADS and its working really nicely. I have 2 questions for now: Is it normal that an SA-11 site is reported having it's radar destroyed in the debug output? The site seems to work normally and it has an SA-11 Command vehicle and a SA-11 search radar. Is it possible to get the a2adispatcher working in Syria? I have tried to set it up exactly like in the demo but no luck so far: Setup: -- Define a SET_GROUP object that builds a collection of groups that define the EWR network. DetectionSetGroup = SET_GROUP:New() -- add the MOOSE SET_GROUP to the Skynet IADS, from now on Skynet will update active radars that the MOOSE SET_GROUP can use for EW detection. redIADS:addMooseSetGroup(DetectionSetGroup) -- Setup the detection and group targets to a 30km range! Detection = DETECTION_AREAS:New( DetectionSetGroup, 80000 ) -- Setup the A2A dispatcher, and initialize it. A2ADispatcher = AI_A2A_DISPATCHER:New( Detection ) -- Set 100km as the radius to engage any target by airborne friendlies. A2ADispatcher:SetEngageRadius() -- 100000 is the default value. -- Set 200km as the radius to ground control intercept. A2ADispatcher:SetGciRadius(600000) -- 200000 is the default value. CCCPBorderZone = ZONE_POLYGON:New( "RED-BORDER", GROUP:FindByName( "RED-BORDER" ) ) A2ADispatcher:SetBorderZone( CCCPBorderZone ) A2ADispatcher:SetSquadron( "Gaziantep", AIRBASE.Syria.Gaziantep, { "Gaziantep" }, 2 ) A2ADispatcher:SetSquadronGrouping( "Gaziantep", 2 ) A2ADispatcher:SetSquadronGci( "Gaziantep", 900, 1200 ) A2ADispatcher:SetTacticalDisplay(true) A2ADispatcher:Start() Debug output: 2021-05-25 12:09:14.046 INFO SCRIPTING: 41258( 40693)/E: AIRBASE00200.GetAirbaseCategory(ERROR: Cannot get category of airbase Gaziantep due to DCS 2.5.6 bug! Assuming it is an AIRDROME for now...) 2021-05-25 12:09:14.047 INFO SCRIPTING: 40585( 12290)/E: AIRBASE00200.Register(ERROR: Cound not get position Vec2 of airbase Gaziantep) 2021-05-25 12:09:14.047 INFO SCRIPTING: 12955( 12171)/I: DATABASE00003._RegisterAirbases(Register Airbase: Gaziantep, getID=11, GetID=11 (unique=11))
-
While we are getting ready to celebrate the 3-year anniversary of this bug, I wanted to ask if you maybe had an update on this. The new WW2 map has been released for a while after all.
-
Okay, I won't hold my breath though.
-
AI Gunnery Unreasonable at High-Aspects
MrExplosion replied to Nealius's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
Or make a mission and have 2 AI pilots fly head on. Play that mission 10x on 2.5 and 10x on 2.7. Record the Tacview and compare. You wouldnt need to play the mission yourself and only let the mission run for 1 minute (just the head on). That would let us see if anything changed. In my opinion AI gunnery and flight physics have been broken pre and post 2.7 -
Where did you get the information, that we will get the improved engine? I am under the impression that ED will never touch the Anton again.
-
AI Gunnery Unreasonable at High-Aspects
MrExplosion replied to Nealius's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
Do you have any proof that could serve a basis for discussion? Like Tacview files that let us compare? -
AI Gunnery Unreasonable at High-Aspects
MrExplosion replied to Nealius's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
AI Gunnery Unreasonable at High-Aspects Fixed the subject for you. -
requested Suggestion for new airfield on Normandy Map
MrExplosion replied to philstyle's topic in Wish list
Is the Ugra team willing to invest any time at all into improving the Normandy map? If yes, what time frame are we talking about? There are so many open issues for this map and no feedback at all from the devs. This is not a situation that feels appropriate for neither ED nor the users who bought the map unfortunately. At least updating us on the feedback you received when you mentioned it would be nice. Or any information about how you mention it.... do you open a ticket? -
reported Typo in the cockpit - "Außenaschluß" vs. "Außenanschluß"
MrExplosion replied to Chapelmaggot's topic in Bugs and Problems
You are correct. Totally unplayable. -
Now I'm curious if this question will ever be answered in the first place
-
DCS: Me 262 Discussion (Development on hold currently)
MrExplosion replied to NineLine's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
18 April 1941 -- first flight of Me-262 Happy belated 80th bday -
fixed your typo
-
DCS: Me 262 Discussion (Development on hold currently)
MrExplosion replied to NineLine's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
What an uneducated and uncalled for comment. -
DCS: Me 262 Discussion (Development on hold currently)
MrExplosion replied to NineLine's topic in Western Europe 1944-1945
100% agree. It seems to me like the fish stinks from the head. Is there a list of Nick's favourite warbirds, so we can estimate what the future of DCS WW2 will hold? -
There are other servers that were made specifically so you could fly warbirds in MP without the need for a map or the asset pack. SoW pays great attention to atmosphere & detail and would not work without WW2 assets.