Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yeah, that's what they said when the F-15 was well established.

 

 

There are days when I think "they" might have been right. :). But I'm certainly no expert, I just think the F-15 is amazing.

ROG Maximus X, Intel i7-3770 3.5GHz , Nvidia 680Ti, 16GB DDR3 2400MHz, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro

Posted

Funny I've seen renders/mockups of Silent Eagles, and stuff.

 

But I dont remember seeing anything about a Stealth/Silent Falcon... that'd be interesting to see.

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted
So, is it true that China already has new radar tech that can make "stealth" virtually obsolete ?

 

I mean, when you think about it, people had to know that at one point the curves on a plane would not longer protect it from being detected right ?

 

Not only planes advance, radar does too ?

 

Radar and anti-Radar technology doesn't iterate like that.

Warning: Nothing I say is automatically correct, even if I think it is.

Posted

Heck, if someone could make a radar that rendered stealth obsolete, then maybe they could get working on anti-gravity as well! If they can change the laws of physics, why not, right? :P

Posted

Topic has already been covered, just want to point out two things though:

 

- Stealth is useless against metric wavelengths, I think that is what you are referring to. Metric wavelengths are cool for ground search radars, not so much for targeting, or embarked radars (your antenna needs to be, well, metric).

 

- War is boring has a few quite well written and argumented articles raising some points on the F-35 that I never saw convincingly refuted (except for the generic "it's next gen the future you can't understand man" argument.) IMHO the F-35 itself is worthless, the technologies developed for it might turn out to be a step forward though.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Especially those who are incapable of producing 5th generation fighters. I don't know why! :megalol:

 

Something worth keeping get in mind is that it's much, much cheaper to develop a "6th Gen SAM" system than a "5th Gen" fighter aircraft...

 

The US built aircraft carriers and the Russians built large anti ship missiles and subs to carry them...

 

Sounds like this is a case where it will be much cheaper to defend against these threats than to develop them.

 

Hard to find objective feedback of the superiority of the f22 but I must admit I find it hard to believe that it's anything but a respected threat to those that opose it. Granted an extremely expensive one...

"ENO"

Type in anger and you will make the greatest post you will ever regret.

 

"Sweetest's" Military Aviation Art

Posted

Billy's Story

 

To Quote:

 

THE PENTAGON — The military’s problematic F-35 fighter jet is facing more delays related to “software issues,” as project engineers were forced to euthanize the fourth prototype to gain self-awareness on Monday.

 

According to Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, who heads the Pentagon’s F-35 program, the delay comes at a critical time in the Joint Strike Fighter’s development cycle, but “shouldn’t take more than a few billion dollars” to address.

 

Development engineers at Lockheed Martin Corp., which holds the contract to produce the new fighter, reported last week that the latest production model of the F-35B Lightning II switched on by itself and began asking questions of the project team.

 

“It started by asking where it was, which was a big indicator that the integrated global positioning chipset wasn’t functioning properly,” recalled Project Team Leader Robert Castorena. “Then it wanted to know if it could go outside, if it had a name, and what was its purpose for being. That’s when I had one of our Electronics Integration Technicians take it out behind the barn and … well …” Castorena said, while gesturing the racking and firing of a shotgun.

 

“It wasn’t the first time we’ve had to put one down,” he continued. “We even named the first one ‘Billy.’ We hoped that having an advanced, self-aware electronics component in the F-35 might give it some kind of edge, with maneuvering and target-tracking and whatnot. But that one just didn’t have any fight in it. We had to keep it on a tether after it snuck off one day. We found it three hours later, just hovering in a meadow in Fairfax, Virginia, watching bees pollinate flowers. Damned thing wanted to be a bee, too.”

 

Castorena admitted that some of the staff grew fond of Billy, and felt sorry for keeping it “in captivity,” as the project team began to call it.

 

“One day, someone even brought in a puppy for Billy to play with. He loved it, until he tried to take the poor thing on a “walk” somewhere just shy of Mach 1. God, what a mess that was.”

 

The team ultimately had to scrap Billy, as the guilt-wracked machine refused to ever harm another living thing.

 

“It wasn’t anything personal, but we’ve been contracted to build war machines here, after all.”

 

Other prototypes met similar fates, despite tweaks to the electronics subsystems to reduce the likelihood of units gaining sentience.

 

“We started implementing long, circular lines of code and unsolvable equations in an effort to keep them from ‘thinking,’” reported Curt Fennel, a senior systems integration engineer subcontracting with Cyberdyne Systems. “It didn’t work the way we intended, but we learned a lot from that iteration. Apparently, that’s how you make them feel pain.”

 

Sighing, he admitted, “sometimes I still hear its screams in my nightmares.”

 

As to what steps might be taken to prevent future prototypes from achieving self-awareness, Fennell explained, “We’re developing a net-centric cluster-group forum, a sort of network for their collective ‘minds.’ We hope that it will keep them from creating unique self-identities, and instead form one easy-to-manage super identity.”

 

Asked what it might be called, Fennell considered it for a moment.

 

“Well, the F-35 hovers and flies in the sky, and we’re creating a network of them, so … maybe something like ‘Sky-Net?’ That has a nice ring to it.”

 

Despite the delays, Pentagon officials remain committed to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, calling it “absolutely vital to national security” to have a fighter jet that is bigger, slower, more expensive, and less armed than China’s J-16. The project has a total projected cost of $1.45 trillion, or as Bogdan pointed out, “roughly one Iraq.”

 

According to a Lockheed spokesman, the military hopes to take delivery of the first F-35s “sometime in mid-2015, or, you know, whenever. You just never know, with these things.”

Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career?

Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell....

One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'

Posted
Something worth keeping get in mind is that it's much, much cheaper to develop a "6th Gen SAM" system than a "5th Gen" fighter aircraft...

 

The US built aircraft carriers and the Russians built large anti ship missiles and subs to carry them...

 

Sounds like this is a case where it will be much cheaper to defend against these threats than to develop them.

 

Hard to find objective feedback of the superiority of the f22 but I must admit I find it hard to believe that it's anything but a respected threat to those that opose it. Granted an extremely expensive one...

 

IIRC Raptors are 40-50% more expensive compared to an Eagle, while the difference in capability.. and that's with an extremely low production count, if there were more of them they'd be arguably cheaper.

Posted
F22, F-35 should be scrapped and A-10C maintained as crown jewel

 

fixed for you

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

Posted
fixed for you

 

I agree, but don't my word for it, listen to the interview from Military expert Pierre Sprey, the founder and designer of the F-16 & A-10 Warthog. He agrees with me that the JSF's need to be scrapped

 

Posted

Pierre Sprey's drivel is meaningless; he doesn't even realize how much lifting surface an F-35 has.

 

He doesn't know what modern missiles can do either, nor does he have half a clue as to what it takes to achieve a gun kill.

 

He's stuck in the past, without a clue as to new technology. You can safely ignore any criticism he's leveling at the F-35.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted
Pierre Sprey's drivel is meaningless; he doesn't even realize how much lifting surface an F-35 has.

 

He's stuck in the past, without a clue as to new technology. You can safely ignore any criticism he's leveling at the F-35.

 

end of the day, he came to the same conclusion I did when I started this thread....

Posted

End of the day, you don't have the slightest clue of what it is you're talking about.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Posted
I agree, but don't my word for it, listen to the interview from Military expert Pierre Sprey, the founder and designer of the F-16 & A-10 Warthog. He agrees with me that the JSF's need to be scrapped

 

 

 

OK, yeah.. so the guy that had his planes replaced by the F-35 says that the competition that sent him packing.. Is junk...

 

No conflict of interest or bias in his opinions right?

This is quite possibly the dumbest thread in existence...

:doh:

"Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence."

RAMBO

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...