Cobra847 Posted March 2, 2015 Author Posted March 2, 2015 Cobra is online ... Last Activity: 03-02-2015 08:46 PM Current Activity: Viewing Thread Leatherneck Simulations Monthly Update - Februamarch 2015 :detective_2: Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
ironmarc Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 I just prefer the Soviet aircrafts more :) :thumbup: This. No need for a Google Search battle. I like it more because it's american/soviet. The end.
Dingo_Bob Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Cobra must have that gif bound to a macro / hot key ;) 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Modules are like Pokemon you gotta catch 'em all :joystick::lol::pilotfly: AMD Ryzen7 3700x, G-Skills 32Gb RAM @ 3200Mhz, MSI GTX1080Ti, TM Warthog (20cm extension by Sahaj), MFG Crosswind Pedals, Oculus Rift, Track Ir5
FSKRipper Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 I think they will introduce an incognito mode for Cobra if this continues :megalol: i9 9900K @ 5,0GHz | 1080GTX | 32GB RAM | 256GB, 512GB & 1TB Samsung SSDs | TIR5 w/ Track Clip | Virpil T-50 Stick with extension + Warthog Throttle | MFG Crosswind pedals | Gametrix 908 Jetseat [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
speckfire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Cobra make it or break it maannn!!!!! Speed is life !!!
pyromaniac4002 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Saying the F-111 is better than the Su-24 is like saying the A-10 is better than the B-52 - Why compare them ? Well, for a start they're a hell of a lot more comparable than an A-10 is to a B-52. They're both fighter-bombers, they both are meant to infiltrate an enemy's airspace by nap of the earth flying and high speed, they both have a crew of two, I mean this list can go on and on. The list of differences would be shorter. You can forgive people for making comparisons.
Gargoyle1 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 The hype IS REAL Wanna see my latest DCS: World movie? Follow this link! My YouTube channel- https://www.youtube.com/user/Gargoyle792nd [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
VTJS17_Fire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Since he already updated the time for the announcement, this just means he is watching, and laughing. ;) Did I oversee this? Where? Source? Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
VTJS17_Fire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 :D Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Boomer20 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 One thing for sure, Leatherneck knows how to bring in a crowd. Currently 58 viewing this thread. 70 in the entire subsection
REDEYE_CVW-66 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 IF you own this- now would be a good time to put it on.
EngineerFalcon Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Well, for a start they're a hell of a lot more comparable than an A-10 is to a B-52. They're both fighter-bombers, they both are meant to infiltrate an enemy's airspace by nap of the earth flying and high speed, they both have a crew of two, I mean this list can go on and on. The list of differences would be shorter. You can forgive people for making comparisons. True (Although they're more Attack aircraft than fighter-bombers, with the Aadvarak doubling as a medium bomber). Comparisons are fine, I was just troubled by the whole "copy of one another" and "better at one's role" thing, since they're neither copied nor have the same use.
fltsimbuff Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Excuse me sir but you are completely wrong. First, the Su-24 is not an imitation of the F-111, just like the Tu-160 is not an imitation of the B-1. It's simply different designers finding the same solution to the same problems. Also, even comparing the two aircraft makes no sense. Despite a similar appearance they weren't intended for the same roles. The Su-24 wasn't meant to be very long ranged, as its Russian nickname implies - "Frontline Bomber". It was also intended to carry cruise missiles, as those are a very important element of the Russian strategy, and greatly increase the delivery range, while the Americans believe in precision bomb strikes. Saying the F-111 is better than the Su-24 is like saying the A-10 is better than the B-52 - Why compare them ? Yes, their roles were a little different (nowhere near as different as you seem to think though). The Su-24 was built for a similar purpose, but in accordance with Soviet doctrine (we didn't use our assets the same way). The Variable Geometry wings were added to the design because of the F-111, however. So no, it wasn't a carbon copy like the Tu-4, but it "borrowed" some design elements and both were strike aircraft intended to be used according to their respective doctrines. I wouldn't shun a Fencer one was announced shortly by Leatherneck though... While they are at the whole variable-geometry thing...
speckfire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 And the weather outside is .... :rolleyes: Speed is life !!!
ironmarc Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 One thing for sure, Leatherneck knows how to bring in a crowd. Currently 58 viewing this thread. 70 in the entire subsection You do quality work, you'll get people's attention. All this teasing and stalling wouldn't really work this well before the 21.
xxJohnxx Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Did I oversee this? Where? Source? Here: Let me save some F5 buttons; Around 20.00 EST. Check out my YouTube: xxJohnxx Intel i7 6800k watercooled | ASUS Rampage V Edition 10 | 32 GB RAM | Asus GTX1080 watercooled
EngineerFalcon Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 And the weather outside is .... :rolleyes: Raining (Tom)cats and (Bird) dogs here :)
VTJS17_Fire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Damn, I thought "European Standard Time" ... :doh: (to less sleep) Why a time zone of north eastern America? LN Simulations is based in Poland, and IIRC with nobody coming from the states. Maybe a announcement by Wags? Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
speckfire Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Raining (Tom)cats and (Bird) dogs here :) Good forecast ;) Speed is life !!!
effte Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Ah, it's confirmed: It's a stealth aircraft! :smilewink: ----- Introduction to UTM/MGRS - Trying to get your head around what trim is, how it works and how to use it? - DCS helos vs the real world.
outlawal2 Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 First production models carried the AN/ALS-23 IRST (infra-red) system. It was probably of dubious usability since it was later replaced by the TCS system which was an optical system, but normally operated as slaved by the radar to identify the target from long range (in good visibility conditions only). The F-14D had both in a dual chin pod so maybe the IRST wasn't completely useless (but seems to have been used for purposes other than A2A like navigation at night or low visibility, air to ground search, etc.). In any case, neither could be used to launch a Phoenix, AFAIK, which wouldn't make much sense since they couldn't provide target range. Having said that, if the Phoenix really supported the rumored "flyout" mode, perhaps it could have technically been queued in direction by the IRST or even TCS (though, searching for a target with TCS seems too far fetched), but that would seem like a potential waste of a very expensive missile. Too bad the weapon employment manuals are still classified, I suppose. CHEERS! Appreciate the well written explanation... :thumbup: "Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence." RAMBO
Art-J Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Damn, I thought "European Standard Time" ... :doh: (to less sleep) Why a time zone of north eastern America? LN Simulations is based in Poland, and IIRC with nobody coming from the states. Maybe a announcement by Wags? For the record, I seem to recall Rudel is a Yank (anybody feel free to correct me If I'm wrong) and If he's doing all gfx job on his side of Atlantic, EST sounds reasonable. 1 i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.
Alicatt Posted March 2, 2015 Posted March 2, 2015 Damn, I thought "European Standard Time" ... :doh: (to less sleep) Why a time zone of north eastern America? LN Simulations is based in Poland, and IIRC with nobody coming from the states. Maybe a announcement by Wags? I thought Rudel is in Florida, which if he is, gives legitimacy to the EST as a time zone for posting :) Sons of Dogs, Come Eat Flesh Clan Cameron
Recommended Posts