DCS Update Patch Notes Discussion Thread

[BIGNEWY]

Please do not derail this thread,

 

I have been working on hornet fixes and we will see some work around the hornet in the next patch, but as mentioned in the news letter there will be a big push on the hornet after this next patch.

 

thanks

[Outlaw24]

I'm of the opinion that the chances of seeing any output of the 'hard push on the Hornet systems' we've been told of this side of the Xmas break is now tending to zero as there will no doubt be pressure to push these changes on the Viper to Stable before ED reorients back to the Hornet, and the time it has taken just to get to here on the Viper Radar is considerable, so expecting to get improvements to things (like TWS, AACQ, INS, Countermeasures, TGP improvements etc) on the Hornet in a span of 2 to 3 weeks would be false hope.

 

Very disappointed/angry with ED at the moment at the continuing treatment of the Hornet/owners so would appreciate an update on the knock on consequences.

 

I totally agree with you, the Hornet will be the hanger Queen until next year., not real happy about that.

[Raisuli]

Bignewy, thanks for keeping us updated, and another big thanks to the guys hammering out all this magic. You're all doing a fantastic job.

[BIGNEWY]

Bignewy, thanks for keeping us updated, and another big thanks to the guys hammering out all this magic. You're all doing a fantastic job.

 

No problem, and thanks for the support.

[Dauntless]

:thumbup:

 

:joystick:

[Nagilem]

Sorry guys, but I don't think the VoIP update makes much difference. SRS has been working fantastically for a long time, and those that want to communicate do via SRS. I'm not saying it's not a good addition, but in light of all the current bugs, it isn't that groundbreaking of news (at least not to me).

 

Now if they'd add usability in the jet with in better mission planning tools and a data cartridge, they may have something. That looks to be a long ways off though.

 

I just hope what they are about to roll out doesn't again break something that already works - either SRS or other jet functions.

[BuzzU]

Please do not derail this thread,

 

I have been working on hornet fixes and we will see some work around the hornet in the next patch, but as mentioned in the news letter there will be a big push on the hornet after this next patch.

 

thanks

 

Thank you. I wish I had your patience in dealing with the impatient. You have a tough job.

[Sajarov]

I do not understand Why ED cannot release a patch with Third parties updates this week in the same way they did for the French Air force last week.

[macedk]

Hire more people DCS :)

 

Can I at least get something to balance my tgp on the F-16 please ....driving me nuts ...anything will do ...a bag of rocks zip tied to the other station ...I don't care ..something( wink wink and with a smile) ;)

[=DECOY=]

I do not understand Why ED cannot release a patch with Third parties updates this week in the same way they did for the French Air force last week.

It's only a week ;) I would rather wait and still be able to use my game than have an update that will break my install and stop me enjoying this awesome game.

 

To me the improvements ED are making to this game will be worth the wait from what i read in Bignewy's post ;)

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

[Mr_sukebe]

It's only a week ;) I would rather wait and still be able to use my game than have an update that will break my install and stop me enjoying this awesome game.

 

To me the improvements ED are making to this game will be worth the wait from what i read in Bignewy's post ;)

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

 

+1

Can we please let them be the judge of what's appropriate/safe to release.

[Sajarov]

It's only a week ;) I would rather wait and still be able to use my game than have an update that will break my install and stop me enjoying this awesome game.

 

To me the improvements ED are making to this game will be worth the wait from what i read in Bignewy's post ;)

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

What a beautiful False dicotomy my Friend.

 

By the Way, Well done with the Mirage, It´s an outstanding work now! :thumbup:

 

 

Yeap ED improvements will be great and it should be released when the features are finished, as usual.

 

But if other third parties have finished some features, corrected some bugs, why wait for ED? Release a patch without F-16 and Hornet changes should not break the simulator.

[=DECOY=]

What a beautiful False dicotomy my Friend.

 

By the Way, Well done with the Mirage, It´s an outstanding work now!

 

 

Yeap ED improvements will be great and it should be released when the features are finished, as usual.

 

But if other third parties have finished some features, corrected some bugs, why wait for ED? Release a patch without F-16 and Hornet changes should not break the simulator.

We test using the 'to be released version' not the 'already out version'

 

 

All our dll's and manifest files are created for the to be released version,if we release without the new build from DCS.

 

Your modules wouldn't work ;)

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

[Sajarov]

We test using the 'to be released version' not the 'already out version'

 

 

All our dll's and manifest files are created for the to be released version,if we release without the new build from DCS.

 

Your modules wouldn't work ;)

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk

My mistake, I suppose that you know how it works, so you will understand properly.

I mean, Third parties sending their changes to ED, and ED cooking a new build and testing internally as usual..In a few words, do everything as usual to release a new build into open beta but without Falcon and Hornet changes.

 

I hope that is more clear now. :thumbup:

[BIGNEWY]

Morning all,

 

Please keep this thread for Discussion of the patch notes thank you.

[Worrazen]

We have huge plans for further development of the feature including automatically created rooms for multi-crew, radio support with real radio visibility depending on the power of actual radio units and terrain, etc.

 

Oooooh I'll be darn!

[Arctander]

Oooooh I'll be darn!

 

You might want to check out SRS that already had these while you wait for EDs implementation....

[Tiramisu]

It seems like the built-in VOIP will have more features than SRS like e.g. simulating the radio transimission power, which will come later.

[Tippis]

It seems like the built-in VOIP will have more features than SRS like e.g. simulating the radio transimission power, which will come later.

SRS already does that but it's usually turned off because it's just annoying.

[Gruman]

And I doubt that that the In-House VOIP will support external users for Human GCI/AWACS/ATC operations.

[Kid18120]

And I doubt that that the In-House VOIP will support external users for Human GCI/AWACS/ATC operations.

They'll probably implement this as an expansion of the actual combined arms module

[Eaglewings]

When will the new VIOP come in?

Is it coming in with the 27th November open beta?

[BIGNEWY]

When will the new VIOP come in?

Is it coming in with the 27th November open beta?

 

Yes that is our plan.

[Eaglewings]

Yes that is our plan.

Thank you for the information.

Looks like a super exciting 27th November open beta update.

Cheers

[Napa]

Finger on F5 key is ready!