Jump to content

** Leaving Drydock! Forrestal Class Update **


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 158
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
So how many devs have managed to catapult their F-14s into the port elevator shaft by now?

 

 

I don't think any, since they have the safety barriers up on the bow. She is not ready for flight quarters yet.

Posted
I don't think any, since they have the safety barriers up on the bow. She is not ready for flight quarters yet.

 

I think you're looking at the wrong set of catapults.

 

Forrestal-class_aircraft_carrier_deck_plan_1962.png

Posted

Very nice. All we need now is a Vietnam map, A-4 and F-4J ;)

X-Plane 11.5x / DCS 2.5.6 / P3Dv5 / Aerofly FS 2 / War Thunder

 

Win10-x64 | ASUS Z390 Maximus VI | Intel i7-9700K @3.6GHz | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32 GB DDR4 | 6TB SSD Samsung 850 Pro | 2TB M2 PCI 4x | ASUS GTX 1080 ROG STRIX 8GB DDR5X | TM Hotas Warthog | Saitek Combat Pedals | Oculus Rift S

Posted

Great Job ! Talking about the Carrier Battle Group, I assume most of the era scorts will be present, Perry,Spruance,Knox,Leahy,Farragut, but what can you say about the SSN included in a CBG ? We know that submarine capability is NONE at the moment into DCS, but will be able to see some introduction, maybe a surfaced Sturgeon or Los Angeles class ?

Posted
Don't bother painting it, take my money and give me plane and boat.

Ta.

 

haha! yep, Maybe just needs some none skid, but other than that it looks haze grey and underway to me :D

Posted

I can already feel that satisfying wump sound when the wheels hit the deck.

 

Will the elevators be functional, and to what extent?

"It's amazing, even at the Formula 1 level how many drivers still think the brakes are for slowing the car down."

Posted

What is that tall post called that stands up on the right hand side of the flight deck out in front of the island, close to the #1 cat?? I'm pretty certain that its purpose is to give the bridge crew a reference for steering the boat and is not retractable. I am surprised that the Stennis doesn't have one. The Vinson even has one. Seems odd that ED would have left that detail out, and even more odd that the rivet counters on this forum haven't complained about its absence, that I know of anyway. Regardless, the ship model is beautiful and I can't wait to give you my money!! :thumbup:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
What is that tall post called that stands up on the right hand side of the flight deck out in front of the island, close to the #1 cat?? I'm pretty certain that its purpose is to give the bridge crew a reference for steering the boat and is not retractable. I am surprised that the Stennis doesn't have one. The Vinson even has one. Seems odd that ED would have left that detail out, and even more odd that the rivet counters on this forum haven't complained about its absence, that I know of anyway. Regardless, the ship model is beautiful and I can't wait to give you my money!! :thumbup:

 

That is what we called the Nav Pole. It had a ladder to the top, an anemometer, wind vane and other aerials on it. Every carrier I have been on, Kitty Hawk, Enterprise, and most of the Nimitz class have all had them.

Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills.

 

If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

 

"If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!"

Posted
What is that tall post called that stands up on the STARBOARD side of the flight deck out in front of the island, close to the #1 cat?? I'm pretty certain that its purpose is to give the bridge crew a reference for steering the boat and is not retractable. I am surprised that the Stennis doesn't have one. The Vinson even has one. Seems odd that ED would have left that detail out, and even more odd that the rivet counters on this forum haven't complained about its absence, that I know of anyway. Regardless, the ship model is beautiful and I can't wait to give you my money!! :thumbup:

 

 

There, I fixed it for ya ;)

 

But seriously, not every ship even in the Nimitz class was identical so id not be surprised if some didn't have the Nav Pole.

 

Would have to look at photos of the ships we’ve got modeled

"Chops"

Posted
;3575212']Would have to look at photos of the ships we’ve got modeled

Stennis:

US_Navy_070206-N-0684R-349_USS_John_C._Stennis_%28CVN_74%29_and_guided_missile_destroyer_USS_O%27Kane_%28DDG_77%29_move_into_formation_in_preparation_for_a_photo_exercise_along_with_USS_Preble_%28DDG_88%29%2C_USS_Antietam_%28CG_54%29_and_USNS_Brid.jpg

Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Are we going to have to fly through clouds of exhaust produced by the oil-fired boilers? :P

 

A friend who is a master of a very large containership was telling me that they have to keep 3 types of fuel:

Bunker oil, which is like a thin black grease and needs warmed up before it can be fed to the engine and produces lots of black smoke when under power;

 

Heavy oil, which is a dark fluid oil like a thin crude oil and does not require heating before being fed to the engine, it still produces smoke but not as much as the bunker oil;

 

Diesel oil, the lightest oil and similar to what you would put in your car or truck, mainly it is required for entering port in the US especially in California which have quite stringent pollution requirements.

 

This is for the Sulzer 12RT-flex96C cylinder diesel engine not a steam boiler though.

 

http://www.containership-info.com/vessel_9289958.html

Sons of Dogs, Come Eat Flesh

Clan Cameron

Posted
A friend who is a master of a very large containership was telling me that they have to keep 3 types of fuel:

Bunker oil, which is like a thin black grease and needs warmed up before it can be fed to the engine and produces lots of black smoke when under power;

 

Heavy oil, which is a dark fluid oil like a thin crude oil and does not require heating before being fed to the engine, it still produces smoke but not as much as the bunker oil;

 

Diesel oil, the lightest oil and similar to what you would put in your car or truck, mainly it is required for entering port in the US especially in California which have quite stringent pollution requirements.

 

This is for the Sulzer 12RT-flex96C cylinder diesel engine not a steam boiler though.

 

http://www.containership-info.com/vessel_9289958.html

 

Thankfully, most commercial vessels designed today use diesel engines. Bunker fuel and heavy fuel oil is really nasty stuff.

Posted
Are we going to have to fly through clouds of exhaust produced by the oil-fired boilers? :P

 

Why do you need boilers when you have a nuke plant producing tons of steam?

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...