Jump to content

DCS: Black Shark - Dev Updates - 09 July 2008


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 503
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

hmmm... an idea...

 

And what will be the counterpart of F-16C (maybe Mig-29K or SMT)?...

Superserb has a rgeat idea! Why not release counterparts at the same time? At least one set of them anyway. I think that would be great for those who like flying online, and even good for those who fly primarily offline. Probably not a very likely scenario, though.:(

Flyby out

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted
Superserb has a rgeat idea! Why not release counterparts at the same time? At least one set of them anyway. I think that would be great for those who like flying online, and even good for those who fly primarily offline. Probably not a very likely scenario, though.:(

Flyby out

It would be very sweet indeed to get a "rival pair" DCS:Falcon vs. Falcrum, but then we'd have to wait not 9 months but 1.5 years for that module. I'm not sure that would be a good idea. Besides, a new flyable would certainly take 9 months to learn well :)

I don't care personally but I'd say it would make business sense to complete the Falcon module first as there are quite a lot of F-16 simmers out there that are ready for something new and fresh, clickable pit AND good graphics and flight model ;)

i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5

Posted

Yellonet,

As I said, releasing a rival pair is probably not very likey.:smilewink: The present process DCS is using may support a dual release at this time. I don't really know one way or the other. But here's an idea. Enlist recognized modders to speed up the process where applicable. Perhaps a well coordintated plan could result in a dual release, if not in the near future, perhpas down the road? Just a blockhead trying to think outside his box. That's me!:P

Flyby out

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted

I think he meant that he would like to see a multirole aircraft like the F-16 but for "the other side", no?

 

That's definitely something missing on the list but I guess they can't do for example a MiG-29M or SMT because of lack of data.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Yellonet,

As I said, releasing a rival pair is probably not very likey.:smilewink:

Oh, sorry, I guess I missed that :poster_oops:

i7-2600k@4GHz, 8GB, R9 280X 3GB, SSD, HOTAS WH, Pro Flight Combat Pedals, TIR5

Posted

Well guys, no matter how it shakes out we're in for a good time. DCS will lead the way to combat simulation heaven. Eurofor perhaps your interpretationis the correct one: a multirole a/c for the other side. That works for me! Oh, no problem, Yellonet. Sometimes I miss something the wife says when she's sitting right next to me (years of practice)!:lol:

Flyby out

ps if she ever reads this, I'm dead meat!:P

The U.S. Congress is the best governing body that BIG money can buy. :cry:

Posted
I think he meant that he would like to see a multirole aircraft like the F-16 but for "the other side", no?

 

That's definitely something missing on the list but I guess they can't do for example a MiG-29M or SMT because of lack of data.

 

Yes, eurofor, that's exactly what I mean...no matter when the module with Russian multirole fighter is released...but rather, is this possible (because, as you said, lack of data)? If this is the case, then...:cry:...but...maybe ED, after all, has access to some valuable data, but we don't know that...yet:smilewink:.

Sorry for my bad English...

Posted

By the time we see DCS:F-16 and MiG-29 modules some of the M and SMT data might be declassified...Perhaps!

 

But I'm pretty good with having an AFM vanilla MiG-29!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)
Is there gona be "live" training mission? hated Lo for only have training movies...
Training will be done through the track system, similar to LO.

 

And what will be the counterpart of F-16C (maybe Mig-29K or SMT)?...
In general, releasing "counterpart" aircraft is not a priority for DCS, because such an option may not always be possible given the more important criteria of having enough information and streamlining the military and entertainment-line projects. Having said that, I'm sure ED would prefer to release such aircraft when a good opportunity exists. The MiG-29SMT has been brought up as a possible aircraft in the past, but at this time it is not officially in the plans for DCS. Subject to change. Edited by EvilBivol-1

- EB

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Nothing is easy. Everything takes much longer.

The Parable of Jane's A-10

Forum Rules

Posted

Awesome update! I hope you guys could done all of what you have dreamed to make. I hope to live long enough to see the Mi-24V, if you guys simulate the co pilot/arti position will be amazing.

 

Best regards.

ASUS N552VX | i7-6700HQ @ 2.59GHz | 16 GB DDR3 | NVIDIA GF GTX 950M 4 Gb | 250 Gb SSD | 1 Tb HD SATA II Backup | TIR4 | Microsoft S. FF 2+X52 Throttle+Saitek Pedals | Win 10 64 bits

Posted

Those videos are really cool. I have seen Bo-105's from the Swedish Air Force doing similar aerobatics at an airshow. Amazing!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...