Most wanted DCS airplane...

[joey45]

Thats our last strike [flat deck] carrier.... NOT THE ONES WE HAVE NOW... with no fighters on cos the F35 is replace[d]ing them.

 

We had to modify the F4s front gear to extend... and other stuff.

 

cos of the short distance the AOA had be changed to get the plane airborne better.

 

After that was scraped it was the other type of carrier [if you can call them that] with the sky ramp.

 

But please I beg you...

Edited August 3, 2009 by joey45

[Endoplasmic Reticulum]

 

But please I beg you...

 

Sorry pal. I begged first :notworthy:. Wait until it's your turn.

 

I have another candidate noone can resist.

 

 

 

 

 

And this one IS old. No electronics or whatsoever. And no need for a carrier as well :joystick:.

 

That's what I call "Heavy Metal":punk:

[joey45]

if enough of us beg then it might happen...... or not. Failing that the Jag.

[Endoplasmic Reticulum]

And as you can see on the third Ekranoplan-Picture, it has thrust-vectoring as well.

 

When it comes to begging...throw in the harrier or Gripen, then I make kebab for all. Oh, I think that's called corruption and not begging. But who cares. As long as I get my baby...

[Weta43]

I can see 16 people sitting on that Ekranoplan - plenty of scope for co-op play there (who's going to be on galley duty)

[sinelnic]

I can see 16 people sitting on that Ekranoplan - plenty of scope for co-op play there (who's going to be on galley duty)

 

Yeah 11 vs 11 soccer over the wings!! hello Konami-DCS partnership for PES 2011. Let's see ED come up with a mathematical model for Messi. That's something I'd pay to see...

[Bisch]

. Let's see ED come up with a mathematical model for Messi. That's something I'd pay to see...

 

Using 6DOF for headers?

[Endoplasmic Reticulum]

plenty of scope for co-op play there

 

Enough space inside the Plan(e) for some Rainbow Six-Style co-op terrorist hunt missions.:gun_smilie:

[vrv]

They should plan on doing a combined naval operations series of DCS. They could release modules like they are now by linking the F-14's, F-18's, MiG-29k's, Su-33's, Buccaneers, Harriers in modules together. But you also have to look at the amount of hands on time they can get. With the Ka-50 you could basically eat and sleep in it but I don't know about some of the others. The F-14 would be easy since there are a few in the US on display and if you wanted to go to Iran you could ;) . The 18's, 29K's and 33's would be more difficult because I don't think the Kremlin would let you borrow one of those for a few months let alone an F-18. Well maybe the original Hornet since they are on display in a few places.

 

You would already have an basis for the combined modules when you release the first one. All you would need to do is add the jets and have different carriers. Some say why carrier missions? Why not? You talk about challenging how about scrambling off of a carrier, getting in a dogfight, reaching bingo-fuel in the middle of the night miles away from the carrier. And you have to land to refuel because no tankers are around. Landing is hard enough and you only have one chance to stick the landing or you get to swim with the fishes. While refueling you would hear the chatter from your wingmen in the dogfight which would add stress and the sense of urgency. Heck you would cut off at 50% and head back out. And most likely you would be low on fuel and you wouldn't be able to afford mistakes on landing.

[GGTharos]

They should plan on doing a combined naval operations series of DCS. They could release modules like they are now by linking the F-14's, F-18's, MiG-29k's, Su-33's, Buccaneers, Harriers in modules together. But you also have to look at the amount of hands on time they can get. With the Ka-50 you could basically eat and sleep in it but I don't know about some of the others. The F-14 would be easy since there are a few in the US on display and if you wanted to go to Iran you could ;) . The 18's, 29K's and 33's would be more difficult because I don't think the Kremlin would let you borrow one of those for a few months let alone an F-18. Well maybe the original Hornet since they are on display in a few places.

 

... But they never will because no one wants a military simulation contract for a lot of those aircraft. Some for obvious reasons (F-14 is retired and destroyed - accurate reproduction would be rather difficult given the fact that SME's are probably already forgetting how the thing used to fly etc).

 

 

You would already have an basis for the combined modules when you release the first one. All you would need to do is add the jets and have different carriers. Some say why carrier missions? Why not? You talk about challenging how about scrambling off of a carrier, getting in a dogfight, reaching bingo-fuel in the middle of the night miles away from the carrier. And you have to land to refuel because no tankers are around. Landing is hard enough and you only have one chance to stick the landing or you get to swim with the fishes. While refueling you would hear the chatter from your wingmen in the dogfight which would add stress and the sense of urgency. Heck you would cut off at 50% and head back out. And most likely you would be low on fuel and you wouldn't be able to afford mistakes on landing.

 

ED right now is doing things by military contract - that is the very basic gist of it, though reality is more complicated.

In other words, the module that comes next is based on what contract they'll get next ... now how many naval aircraft they can cram into the sim.

 

Incindetally, I find almost no challenge in simulated carrier landings - people who botch'em usually aren't any good at landing on a runway either ;)

[vrv]

Screw my idea then. I just hope that we get a jet after the A-10. The genre has been hurting for a while but if they were to produce something with an F-15 / 16 / 18, MiG-29, whatever it would be a epic step. Also I can land on the ground perfectly well but I wasn't naturally gifted with the ability to automatically land on a simulated carrier. It took me a few tries ;)

[Rhino4]

Just want something multi-role... A falcon with all the functionality that dcs brings to the table would be awe-inspiring...

[sungsam]

I believe F16C 52+ w JHMCS will be the best move for ED !

- MultiRole Fighter

- Export Success (Many Nations Use It)

- Raised Interest at the well known OPEN/FREE FALCON community

- The truth is that OPEN/FREE FALCON community actually are costumers of Ka-50 & FC2, beyond dup they will massively bay DCS F16 !

- I Think Raised opportunity for trade success at ED

For Helo module it must be the AH64 Longbow the opposed side of DCS BS !

[71st_Mastiff]

ok what happen with this poll is very out of place there is already a DCS A10c coming so why is it in the list? that took away votes for actually waiting DCS products. re-due! :thumbup:

[TeeJay82]

Multirole + Carrier operations = f18 :D

[jj_pt]

My vote goes for a Su-30. We need 2 seater simulators! :)

[sungsam]

Any double sitter and only if the co-pilot will have multiplayer capability !

[jj_pt]

Any double sitter and only if the co-pilot will have multiplayer capability !

 

Obviously. :D

[robmlufc]

Harrier please!! Gr9 with sniper would do nicely

[Python]

Another vote for the good old Harrier!! failing that F-18 or F16 would be equally great....

[PREDATOR30]

F-16 PLZZZZZZZ!!!! From a F-16 lover...!!! ;)

[MTFDarkEagle]

Harrier!

[VTJS17_Fire]

1. F-15C

2. F/A-18D/E/F/G

3. F-15E or F-16C

 

 

kind regards,

Fire

[Scudslaker]

i d love to get a TORNADO version

[deloy]

Seeing excellent modeling of rotary wing physics in blackshark by DCS, i would love to see another rotary wing attack platform, AH64 Apache or MI28 Havoc. Fixed winged jets have been done well in the past, so its helicopters we should be focusing, anyway, thats my viewpoint:smilewink: