Jump to content

Request for Opinions - Ability to Display True/Magnetic Headings in the Mission Editor


Recommended Posts

  • ED Team
Posted

In one of the polls I did, someone suggested being about to display True/Magnetic headings in the Mission Editor. I wanted to get some opinions how how you would like to see this and where. Also do you want this for aircraft only or anything?

Please only discuss this, all other discussions will be deleted without warning. Thanks!

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Posted

If anywhere, I'd place it in the map ruler. We'll be able to see it at will anywhere. A separate input field would be an unnecessary complication, but you may also add a read only label showing either near an input heading field -- similar thing to IAS, TAS and GS information.

This feature may be useful for most hardcore mil-sim guys, to me such errors/deviations are insignificant. I can calculate them myself or take them into account, when needed.

Wysłane z mojego MI MAX 3 przy użyciu Tapatalka

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, I would like to see this! 🙂

I think the ruler is a good idea, both for air, land an sea units.  If there to expand the idea a little more, if there could be some heading/distance information displayed in the waypoint panel, it would be super helpful to mission designers.  

image.png

Posted (edited)

True Course (TC) +/- Mag Var (MV) = Mag Course (MC) ... I'd also like to see the Magnetic Variation displayed to the right of the coordinate format on the taskbar of where you have placed the cursor crosshairs.

Edited by Backy 51

I don't need no stinkin' GPS! (except for PGMs :D) :pilotfly:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

It would be nice to be able to see both the magnetic heading and the true heading (or would grid heading not be more accurate for DCS?), and/or the magnetic variation. The same would apply to the F10 map.  Personally I don't mind if it is a switched option (like the different options in the coordinate system), or am option to display both headings at once.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

All of the things/suggestion are already stated above by everyone, so, +1 here for adding TRUE/MAG in ME.

Edited by fagulha

About carrier ops: "The younger pilots are still quite capable of holding their heads forward against the forces. The older ones have been doing this too long and know better; sore necks make for poor sleep.'

 

PC: 14th I7 14700KF 5.6ghz | 64GB RAM DDR5 5200 CL40 XMP | Gigabyte RTX 4080 Super Aero OC 16 GB RAM GDDR6X | Thermalright Notte 360 RGB | PSU Thermaltake Though Power GF A3 Snow 1050W ATX 3.0 /  1 WD SN770 1TB M.2 NVME + 1 SSD M.2 2TB + 2x SSD SATA 500GB + 1 Samsung 990 PRO 4TB M.2 NVME (DCS only) | Valve Index| Andre´s JeatSeat.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

At minimum, I'd like to see it shown when using the ruler in the map.

Personally, that's all I need to see.... again, personally.

 

Flight routing is based on ranges and magnetic headings (ignoring GPS waypoints). So I would like to see this on the F10 map as well, not just a feature of the ME.

 

As far as display... just give me a heading with parenthesis and "M" aka:

14.5nm : 245° (230° M)

(15 declination for say NTTR, where it's a massive impact to have this visible)

Edited by XCNuse
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
  • 7 months later...
Posted

Bumping this to add that we need the current true/mag display for the ruler in Mission Planner and Mission Editor. Planning happens before the flight, not after (in F10 map).

  • Like 2
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

+1. This is especially important on the Kola map. When you get that far north, the variations between true and mag can get significant locally. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, jmarso said:

+1. This is especially important on the Kola map. When you get that far north, the variations between true and mag can get significant locally. 

Ditto for the South Atlantic map, particularly for Chile/Argentina. 

Map from Wikimedia Commons:922px-World_Magnetic_Field_Model_2025.jp

Edited by AndyJWest
  • Like 3
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...