What AA method are people using?

[AhSoul]

I've been using DLAA for a while now, as it felt like it gave the nicest looking image quality (for me in VR).

BUT I've now realised it's hiding the black dots of other A/C by blending them into the background or something. So I've gone back to MSAA 4x. This seems to fix the dots so I can actually see others in MP again, but now things are flickering and look pretty crap.

What are other people using? Seems to suck that that whatever option I pick has massive disadvantages.....

[speed-of-heat]

same, though i am also using DLSS or visa versa Antialiasing always comes with disadvantages ... alas but DLAA comes with the least number of disadvantages for me ... what irritates one person another doesn't notice ...

Edited 21 hours ago by speed-of-heat

[AhSoul]

16 minutes ago, speed-of-heat said:

same, though i am also using DLSS or visa versa Antialiasing always comes with disadvantages ... alas but DLAA comes with the least number of disadvantages for me ... what irritates one person another doesn't notice ...

DLAA just makes it so hard to spot stuff.... I could cope with the line shimmering with MSAA but it also seems to make shadows flicker as well?

Maybe I should try no AA at all

[speed-of-heat]

i just force everything to 2 pixels , its not perfect .. but compromises 

[AhSoul]

2 hours ago, speed-of-heat said:

i just force everything to 2 pixels , its not perfect .. but compromises 

I was kinda assuming the MP servers overrode that setting?

Edited 16 hours ago by AhSoul

[Beirut]

Isn't TAA supposed to give the nicest picture on a monitor? Thought I read that somewhere. I know little about all this.

[The Gryphon]

DLAA, works best in VR for me. Gives the sharpest image close up and at a distance.

[draconus]

14 hours ago, Beirut said:

Isn't TAA supposed to give the nicest picture on a monitor?

No, TAA is like worse version of DLAA and no machine learning is involved.

18 hours ago, AhSoul said:

Seems to suck that that whatever option I pick has massive disadvantages

Yes. I choose DLAA - dots visibility is not that much of a problem for me but I can't stand the shimmering of MSAA, or the fences and other jaggies. Don't even try none-AA - serious eyes injury risk - and you'll also want that performance with AA then.

The ASW crap is the worst, not related to AA though.

[Hiob]

 pretty much spot on.

[Hiob]

I cope with the single-dot-DLAA spoting issue by telling myself, that real world spoting when the object is the size of a "a single pixel" isn't perfect either.
Atmospheric effects like thermals (or heat flimmering), pollution, haze/dust, cloudes or even a flock of birds (much nearer) between the target and the spotter, can throw of the visual "lock".

[AhSoul]

I tried a few options last night and they all suck  MSAA flickering, DLAA smearing trails off treetops etc.

I wonder if having a Quest 3 doesn't help as I'm also having to take into account video encoding issues as well....

Probably go back to DLAA and 2pixel dots - would that be bigger/better or worse than auto though?

Edited 11 minutes ago by AhSoul

[speed-of-heat]

Just now, AhSoul said:

Probably go back to DLAA and 2pixel dots - would that be bigger/better or worse than auto though?

Yes... it's not perfect.. none of the options are ... but ... it provides the most consistent visibility ... 

[Vakarian]

No AA as MSAA doesn't work properly, NIS and FSR look worse than no AA