Next DCS (US) Fixed Wing Aircraft Wish List

[RotoFly]

Su-27/Mig-29/Mig-25(31 in my dreams)

F-18/F-15/F-16

:music_whistling:

[FeoFUN]

I just want some modern F-22 speculations.

Fixed for you. :pirate:

 

C'mon guys, even the 10 000 000 votes for the Raptor or JSF won't help change the situation with their secrecy and even in 2020-2025, Falcon, Hornet and Eagle will continue to remain the main and the most distributed NATO/USAF fighters.

[MTFDarkEagle]

if I would be able to chose, the F/A-18E would be awsome, but to be honest: ANY plane at DCS fidility would be awsome!

[Buren]

No love for the Tornado?

[ААК]

Crazy poll. Documentation secrecy on 3 planes of 4, and F-35 still being tested.:megalol:

This thread makes no sense, because not a way to determine the next plane.

[power5]

T-50 looks cooler than the F22 I think.

 

Wonder how they can build a 5th Gen fighter with steam gauges??? << Kidding

 

I will take anything besides F/A-18 and F16.. Sorry, least favorite planes in the sky.

[Python]

No love for the Tornado?

 

Lots of love for the Tonka here....

[REALIN]

I would love to see the Saab JAS 39 Gripen!

 

http://www.saabgroup.com/en/Air/Gripen-Fighter-System/

Edited October 10, 2010 by REALIN

[Agg]

No love for the Tornado?

To be completely honest, no... For some reason Ive never liked the Tornado, and furthermore I think we have more than enough mud movers now with the Su-25 and the SU-25T in Flaming Cliffs and the A-10 in DCS. Dont get me wrong, Ill probably buy ever aircraft in the DCS series, even if the next one is a Tornado, but personally I hope its not ;)

[Python]

To be completely honest, no... For some reason Ive never liked the Tornado, and furthermore I think we have more than enough mud movers now with the Su-25 and the SU-25T in Flaming Cliffs and the A-10 in DCS. Dont get me wrong, Ill probably buy ever aircraft in the DCS series, even if the next one is a Tornado, but personally I hope its not ;)

 

Reheat!! :) I think the training mission would be worth the asking price for the tonka.... 600mph + at 60ft through the welsh vallies is sure to be a rush, id prefer the Harrier myself as i keep saying but would be over the moon with either.

[tzinser]

A-6 intruder would be awesome

[Gwalker99]

A-6 intruder would be awesome

 

YES with carrior ops too full interactive deck ect

[Agg]

Reheat!! :) I think the training mission would be worth the asking price for the tonka.... 600mph + at 60ft through the welsh vallies is sure to be a rush, id prefer the Harrier myself as i keep saying but would be over the moon with either.

Hmmm, I think you just persuaded me :P A Tornado would be cool as well ;)

[Callsign.Vega]

To be completely honest, no... For some reason Ive never liked the Tornado, and furthermore I think we have more than enough mud movers now with the Su-25 and the SU-25T in Flaming Cliffs and the A-10 in DCS. Dont get me wrong, Ill probably buy ever aircraft in the DCS series, even if the next one is a Tornado, but personally I hope its not ;)

 

I agree. SU-25, KA-50, A-10C, all mud movers. We need some air to air now in the mix!

[Buren]

Yes the Tonka is a mud mover. But...

It is a high-speed one. It's got variable swept wings. It's got an Air-to-Ground and Air-to-Air radar (!), with terrain following option. It's a two seater (multiplayer anyone?). It's a European designed aircraft. It looks badass. It can deploy some even more badass weaponry (eg, JP.233, MW-1 etc.) Would be a huge nod for DI's Tornado, one of the first truly hardcore sims. The notion of modelling it wouldn't be far-fetched - it has no uber (classified) technology like the others in the poll. Developers subtly hinting it's consideration (remember April fools screen made on March 31?)

Just my few cents... :music_whistling:

[Avilator]

It's rather hard to deny the BadA$$ness of this plane.

[joey45]

..... it has no uber (classified) technology .....

 

And what would that be then????

 

I could ask my mate who works for BAe systems to name all the class stuff.. same goes for the Jag and Harrier.

[JG27_Arklight]

I, personally, would love a Tornado.

 

Would't mind an Apache either.

 

Overall, I prefer ground-attack aircraft. Air to air seems like the same thing over and over again....i.e., boring.

[Buren]

And what would that be then????

 

I could ask my mate who works for BAe systems to name all the class stuff.. same goes for the Jag and Harrier.

 

Of course it was a bit rash to say that but I hope you agree on that getting neccessary information for the Tornado is way more viable than for the F-14 or the Superbug, right?

 

Of course we can still have a DCS: Cessna 172...

[Rhino4]

Air to air seems like the same thing over and over again....i.e., boring.

I hate you. Seriously...I'm not even kidding...

 

edit: Okay maybe I'm kidding just a little....But only a little!

[power5]

Holy damn, what size are those bombs on that tornado Avilator?

 

A6 and Tornado would be awesome for sure. A6 is all retired though I think. Except for maybe refueling.

[joey45]

they're not bombs, they're fuel tanks..

 

@Buren: I know but unless ED can presuade BAE it will never happen, plus the other companies as well.

 

But yeah a Tonka would be awesome.

[TOYKILLA]

Tornado IDS Rules :thumbup: Please no more US Jets :music_whistling: A MiG29 or SU27 with full 6DOF and clickable Cockpit would be nice too.

[joey45]

I would say-

 

F-16 and F-14 for, the fan-boys, for multirole, intercept and carrier ops

 

Tonka and Jag for UK/GER/Itali and India/ Saudi for Ground pounding and intercept

 

Mig29 / SU27 for Opfor, again Multirole and intercept

 

but thats just me..

[Callsign.Vega]

Is "Tonka" suppose to be a Tornado? What a stupid nickname. Must be a Brit thing.

 

Tornado is a good air-ground aircraft but I don't think it was particularly good at air-air.