Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We get hand-me-downs from their contracts...

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

^^ because there are no British airframes.

 

I fly whatever I like.

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted (edited)
Yea yea:music_whistling:

I flying because we have russian planes in LO2.

But now we have a situation that after a10c will come out another american aircraft.

I think that there is not dynamics in that.

If the first plane was a10c, then the second plane should be russian striker.

Now we'll have the situation that we have two american planes, and no russian.

What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft?

Did we have to wait another five years for russian plane so we can fly too.

It's not fair that the blue guys will fly and red will drive tanks.

 

We have what they get. Community voice has very low if none impact of what type of aircraft will be :)

 

Taking in consider aircraft's documentation and money don't grow on trees it is completely understandable in this matter and I don't see any reason to be disappointed on ED. Your, mine, the people desires about future planes have to be put aside. I suggest you should to make up with DCS :)

Edited by Boberro
  • Like 2

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Posted (edited)

33 Pages in 2 days. Jim Mack created a monster :megalol: . But to echo Bobbero's thoughts ED is a business; they have to do what's best for their bottom line not what will satisfy every flight-simmers virtual wet-dream ideal aircraft.

Edited by Krippz
  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]



64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron

Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron

TS: 195.201.110.22

Posted (edited)
Yea yea:music_whistling:

What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft?

Did we have to wait another five years for russian plane so we can fly too.

It's not fair that the blue guys will fly and red will drive tanks.

 

And if they came out with a Russian fighter first, and some guy from US says he will not fly Russian fighter and must wait for US fighter, I would feel sad for that person as well because I think it is a bad way to be.

 

I am sure ED is aware that some like Eastern fighters and some like Western fighters. If they worked on both an Eastern and Western fighter at the same time tough, that would mean maybe waiting twice as long for the next release. That is no good for us and for them to collect revenue faster. They had to pick one.

Edited by Crunch
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
33 Pages in 2 days. Jim Mack created a monster :megalol: . But to echo Bobbero's thoughts ED is a business; they have to do what's best for their bottom line not what will satisfy every flight-simmers virtual wet-dream ideal aircraft.

Either Russia will want a DCS sim for one of their planes, or US will sell something to them, But it is about the Real Combat Sim first, Public Sims come from Military contacts.:music_whistling: What is nice, is that we all from around the world, get to fly something..so comrades, see you in the air. Cheers, Jim

Edited by celticcoho

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Celticcoho (OriginFreedom)

WIN 7 64 bit, I7975 at 3.6ghz,X58 Classified 3 Mobo, 6gb Corsair 2000 ram, 2 ea ATI 5870 Eyefinity 6 2gb's , 27" Ultra Sharp,(main view), 3 23"touch screens , Tm Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals Track IR 5,:D JIM.:book:

Posted

I can live without a Russian fighter: the avionics are, frankly, sub par compared to western jets.

  • Like 1

"You see, IronHand is my thing"

My specs:  W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.

Posted
I can live without a Russian fighter: the avionics are, frankly, sub par compared to western jets.

 

The Russians have avionics now?! When did that happen?

  • Like 3

 

 

Posted
I can live without a Russian fighter: the avionics are, frankly, sub par compared to western jets.

 

Don't need no fancy Avionics to shove a missile up someone's A$$ :P

  • Like 1

Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career?

Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

'....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell....

One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'

Posted (edited)
Don't need no fancy Avionics to shove a missile up someone's A$$ :P

So that is why my new DCS Predator Drone keeps a flight pattern over Mowers place, HMMMM:doh: He will walk outside to BBQ sometime!!!

Edited by celticcoho
  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Celticcoho (OriginFreedom)

WIN 7 64 bit, I7975 at 3.6ghz,X58 Classified 3 Mobo, 6gb Corsair 2000 ram, 2 ea ATI 5870 Eyefinity 6 2gb's , 27" Ultra Sharp,(main view), 3 23"touch screens , Tm Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals Track IR 5,:D JIM.:book:

Posted
Don't need no fancy Avionics to shove a missile up someone's A$$ :P

 

If you're too busy wrestling with the jet due to poor avionics when would you have the time to lob missiles at me? :P

"You see, IronHand is my thing"

My specs:  W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.

Posted
If you're too busy wrestling with the jet due to poor avionics when would you have the time to lob missiles at me? :P
:megalol::megalol::megalol:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

We all know it's gonna be the Viper ED, so just come out and say it...

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted
If you're too busy wrestling with the jet due to poor avionics when would you have the time to lob missiles at me? :P

 

You must think in Russian :D

I am the alpha and the omega

Posted
Yea yea:music_whistling:

I flying because we have russian planes in LO2.

But now we have a situation that after a10c will come out another american aircraft.

I think that there is not dynamics in that.

If the first plane was a10c, then the second plane should be russian striker.

Now we'll have the situation that we have two american planes, and no russian.

What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft?

Did we have to wait another five years for russian plane so we can fly too.

It's not fair that the blue guys will fly and red will drive tanks.

What a bad attitude. :( You know, many of the A-10C guys started flying the RUSSIAN DCS:Ka-50 helicopter before A-10C. They don't give a damn about where the real life things were welded or riveted, they just like to fly. I won't have any problem about flying MiG/Su or F-1x.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Now I understand this most likely won't happen because releasing one would probably be very un-prudent commercially, but one can always hope still :music_whistling:

Keep hope because they are doing their module with what they had done for their contracts. If I understand what I read. So, if they have done a module of the kc-135 to help military students learning it, there's some hope to have general public version of it.

+ doing a module does not require them to reprogram everything. They don't need to rebuild a 3D engine, or the maps. They only need to build the aircraft, unless they want to improve their 3d engine and maps.

So we still have hope to have one of these beast (C-130, KC-135) and in my dream I saw a B-2

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Windows 7 64bit, Core I7 950, Nvidia GTX 260, 6 gig RAM, TIR 5, Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals, Logitech attack3 :(

Posted
3b48f76275d3f6b145f146c5aeec9d4b.gif
  • Like 2

"You see, IronHand is my thing"

My specs:  W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.

Posted (edited)
I always have a soft spot for the F14, having started with Fleet Defender in my youth!

 

FD rocked for me too in the day but the Turkey itself (sorry to say) is a hideous jet to simulate: it's a ....yawn...fleet interceptor with bad engines (not counting the late comer delta).

 

turkey.jpg

Edited by Mower

"You see, IronHand is my thing"

My specs:  W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.

Posted

DCS F-16 is a good choice... Widely known in the sin genre... many would flock to the sensation of the most realistic F-16 sim ever, whether it be the F-16A or Block 52/60... Plus, very lucrative choice... many countries are currently operating the F-16...

 

Drat... all my hopes for the Eagle is gone... (Come on! 104 kills to 0 losses!) :P

 

Cheers, Still can't wait!

Posted
Yea yea:music_whistling:

I flying because we have russian planes in LO2.

But now we have a situation that after a10c will come out another american aircraft.

I think that there is not dynamics in that.

If the first plane was a10c, then the second plane should be russian striker.

Now we'll have the situation that we have two american planes, and no russian.

What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft?

Did we have to wait another five years for russian plane so we can fly too.

It's not fair that the blue guys will fly and red will drive tanks.

 

 

wah. :cry_2:

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...