LeadDoctor Posted December 14, 2013 Posted December 14, 2013 As the posting title says a man can dream. Ideas comes from dreams. Ideas turn into projects and some time in the future it will happen. Until then sim hard! AMD 955, Asus M4A79t, 12GB 1600 cas7 Mushkin red line and black line, EVGA 670 FTW, Samsung 840 SSD 250GB, Samsung spin point 620GB x3 extra storage.
WRAITH Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) A DCS F-35 + Theaters of WAR with A.i Dynamic Campaigns is needed! But as said, I'm too much frustrated to believe and looking forward to things eventually coming... not the thing for me, anymore. So, last post. Hi Tarracta I agree with you M8 and feel the same way. Seems there's to much "Bull****" in the sim world. Heres more videos of the F-35 which can be modeled into a flight sim game no problem with general knowledge!:thumbup: Dont believe the crap! Even developed with such tools like this .......... http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/ Watch:- Kool yeah!:thumbup: :smilewink: Hopefully FSX will come thru with FSX@WAR....... (Use Google Translate place - http://fsxwar.net/ then select language) *** NOTE:- You can follow discussion and development here:- http://forums.vrsimulations.com/forums/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=6519 FSX has more high quality Air Craft:- * http://secure.simmarket.com/fsx-aircraft-page-1.chtml * http://www.fspilotshop.com/ * http://simviation.com/1/front-page * http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/92/fsx-military-aircraft/ * http://www.fsxaddons.com/files/all/flight-simulator-x/aircraft/tuvured4 * http://www.msfsgateway.com/ * A MUST:- http://indiafoxtecho.blogspot.com.au/ ........... many more if you go on a hunt especially "FREEWARE" make sure you have "FSX Acceleration + Gold Edition" you will be fine. Dont forget Scenery Packs ie Airports, Cities etc So much more on offer than any other Flight Simulator on market. http://www.fullterrain.com/ ............. many more online! :thumbup: Support FSX@WAR - its the best way forward for "Combat Flight Simulation", now days! No one seriously wants to put the effort required these days......... this post confirms it "CLEAR and LOUD" .......... An important point to always lose. ED is not only dedicated to the world of entertainment simulation, has contracts for professional and military products that are their "main" source of income. Just clear they dont focus in this section of there business! My view and opinion why even bother then hand over the DCS Code to another company to seriously build a Combat Flight Simulator and get done with the games and delays. Heaps of large gaming companies that might take up the offer. Or go Open source with code and maybe just pay for Hi-Fi air craft. Then we can see Theaters of WAR created with new GFX engine implemented in better time frames, then current dilemma. Pfft, but I know the run down of excuses and agenda's with this and that which will be posted "SAME OLD DAME OLD"! Its sure sad situation for us all who are and willing to spend money on this hobby or interest of ours. So yep I agree its frustrating for paying customers. But dont necessarily give up just move on to other projects out there, so support FSX@WAR is my best advice. You already can fly the FSX F-35 and F-18 very well I might add, watch............. and "AGAIN" I emphasize F-35 has working systems......... "MUST WATCH":- http://youtu.be/IG-WuEsiSak http://youtu.be/G1KMeOpoVNI As well full Carrier Ops........... http://youtu.be/jkfnHUD4CUI Awersome! **** So ignore the morons and idiots they just all day long! They wouldn't know the difference! Trust Me! :smilewink: I ain't waiting or to be strung along for 20 years development of a Flight Simualtor, Pfftt... LoL! So see you around bud - from one simmer to another keep flyin! :thumbup: :pilotfly:***** Cheers :beer: Edited December 15, 2013 by WRAITH
Dudester22 Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) Hi Tarracta I agree with you M8 and feel the same way. Seems there's to much "Bull****" in the sim world. Heres more videos of the F-35 which can be modeled into a flight sim game no problem with general knowledge!:thumbup: Dont believe the crap! Even with such tools like this .......... http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/ Watch:- I'll throw the question out, but I bet I don't get an answer. What has he used to get his graphics looking like that and with no tree popup? FSX looks nothing like that and adding that jet alone won't change the environment around it. So what graphics is he using? Please tell me, from the ground upwards to the sky above including clouds? I might consider looking at it then? Edited December 15, 2013 by Dudester22
WRAITH Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) Support FSX@WAR and Add-ons Well, there are heaps of FREE HD 1080 Scenery add-ons bud WATCH:- FSX Software you must buy:- VRS TACPAC.......... http://www.vrsimulations.com/tacpack.htm ORBX ................... http://www.orbxsystems.com/forum/topic/52819-orbx-announces-ftx-global-to-be-released-in-2013/ REX...................... http://www.realenvironmentxtreme.com/ GEX ..................... http://flyawaysimulation.com/downloads/files/7309/fsx-team-gex-enhanced-autogen-world-scenery/ FTX ..................... http://fullterrain.com/ etc just go online FSX add-ons and FREEWARE better than any other Flight Sim around bud, go for it. The video Youtube you question, if you check in his Youtube comments he posts the links to Add-ons his used here they are below:- Published on Mar 24, 2013 download here http://simviation.com/1/search?submit... Or download here http://library.avsim.net/esearch.php?... Also check here:- http://www.flightsimworld.com/forums/topic/203325-which-fsx-payware-addons-should-i-buy-first/#entry2499435 Just start talking to people for and the direction you want to go and you will get good advice! :thumbup: **** People have created more for FSX than any other Simulator so ignore the idiot's and morons in sim world! They Just all day long, and they wouldn't know the difference, trust me! :smilewink:*** Cheers, :beer: Edited December 15, 2013 by WRAITH
TAW_Blaze Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 Support FSX@WAR - its the best way forward for "Combat Flight Simulation", now days! No one seriously wants to put the effort required these days......... this post confirms it "CLEAR and LOUD" .......... God you don't have a damn clue about this entire business..
NeilWillis Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 It has to be said Wraith, that FSX also has some bloody contemptible aircraft simulations. Just take a look at the reviews for some of them, including the current European fighter collaboration - that I shall not name as it is not my place to do so. It strikes me that there are, and always will be 2 camps within the flight sim community. The ones who want to feel and experience as close to reality as possible, with all the procedures and technicalities of the prototype, and those who want to just have fun and are happy to ignore some problems. Both stances have their merits, both have their critics. Each to their own. DCS is pretty unique in the sim world for having a desire to serve the first community. Don't try to drag it down to the mediocre as some of us see it. If you want FSX, cool. If you want to fly generic modern fighters, go ahead. Just leave the less forgiving to the hi fidelity, and do what you like. I think however that DCS is the preserve of those wanting the best, not a compromise simply because the facts are not, and cannot yet be known. F35 will come to many sims, some good, some down right pathetic. It is not the right project for DCS, not until we can actually get our hands on the facts, and data necessary to at least make a tilt at accuracy and authenticity. Anything less is not DCS in my mind. 1
TAW_Blaze Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 Exactly. There's a lot of stuff you can do in FSX without worrying because it's non combat oriented. Nobody gives a damn about the avionics there, it has to look fancy, that's all. That's just impossible in DCS.
WRAITH Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) A DCS F-35 + Theaters of WAR with A.i Dynamic Campaigns I'll throw the question out, but I bet I don't get an answer. What has he used to get his graphics looking like that and with no tree popup? FSX looks nothing like that and adding that jet alone won't change the environment around it. So what graphics is he using? Please tell me, from the ground upwards to the sky above including clouds? I might consider looking at it then? Hi Dudester, RE your PM on Air Combat the answer is FSX@WAR Hopefully FSX will come thru with FSX@WAR....... (Use Google Translate place - http://fsxwar.net/ then select language) Check this out.......... also this ............. ......... many more example online *** NOTE:- You can follow discussion and development here:- http://forums.vrsimulations.com/forums/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=6519 Also the many FREEWARE Add-ons and Mods to FSX, ignore the morons and idiots in sim community that crap on FSX they wouldn't know the difference, Trust Me! They just all day long! ***** NOW BACK ON TOPIC - DCS:F-35, a guy can dream right? And your VOTE ........ I voted YES! :thumbup: :smilewink: I am hoping that a 3rd Party Dev might still come thru on this with that Kickstarter Project. Here in this post......... http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1787842&postcount=1 Time will tell, until then! ***************** Cheers :beer: Edited December 15, 2013 by WRAITH
Flamin_Squirrel Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 Wags has stated in the past that their would be three levels of air craft. FC, mid level and DCS. The F-35 would fit in the lines of those. I think there's some misunderstanding about FC style modules. At least IMO, they have less fidelity, not necessarily less accuracy. The majority of their performance and (albeit limited) systems are based on proper information, not guesses. As such, even with high or low fidelity, I don't think an F-35 would fit into any of those categories.
Silver_Dragon Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) The FSX@War / FSX or other sim engine have nonsense on that discussion. My view and opinion why even bother then hand over the DCS Code to another company to seriously build a Combat Flight Simulator and get done with the games and delays. Heaps of large gaming companies that might take up the offer. Or go Open source with code and maybe just pay for Hi-Fi air craft. Then we can see Theaters of WAR created with new GFX engine implemented in better time frames, then current dilemma. Pfft, but I know the run down of excuses and agenda's with this and that which will be posted "SAME OLD DAME OLD"! Its sure sad situation for us all who are and willing to spend money on this hobby or interest of ours. So yep I agree its frustrating for paying customers. :doh::doh::doh: Edited December 15, 2013 by Silver_Dragon For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Scrim Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 Please don't tell me Wraith actually said videos of FSX should be the base for the flight models and such of an F-35 in DCS...
TAW_Blaze Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 OPEN SOURCE SIMULATOR :megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol: :megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol: I just literally died laughing..
LeadDoctor Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 The thing with FSX is you can put lip stick on a pig but its still a pig. AMD 955, Asus M4A79t, 12GB 1600 cas7 Mushkin red line and black line, EVGA 670 FTW, Samsung 840 SSD 250GB, Samsung spin point 620GB x3 extra storage.
Revan Posted December 16, 2013 Posted December 16, 2013 I'll throw the question out, but I bet I don't get an answer. What has he used to get his graphics looking like that and with no tree popup? FSX looks nothing like that and adding that jet alone won't change the environment around it. So what graphics is he using? Please tell me, from the ground upwards to the sky above including clouds? I might consider looking at it then? most of the major enhancements to FSX's graphics you have to pay obscene prices for (like $60 or more). most planes are like that also DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!! Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51
rajdary Posted December 17, 2013 Posted December 17, 2013 Its true that without enough info, it wouldnt be easy to make a decent simulation of the F35, but sometimes our desire to get hold of the newest, coolest mix of roles ,most advanced and most secret jet fighter, can make our common sense not work properly, thats why id love a F35A/B Module, but after reading and reading.... can understand that it wouldnt be flying anything but an ilusión!!! i would buy it anyway!! Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Tempered Glass, Asus ROG Maximus IX Hero, Intel i7 7700K @ 4.8, Corsair HX 1000i, Nzxt Kraken 62, 32gb DDR4 3000Mhz Corsair Dominator Platinum, Nvme SSD Samsung 960 Evo 1Tb, Asus Strix OC 1080ti, Philips 43" 4K Monitor + 2 x Dell 24" U2414H, Warthog HOTAS, Track IR 5, Obutto R3volution, Buttkicker Gamer 2, MFG Crosswind pedals, Occulus Rift CV1, Windows 10 Pro.
WRAITH Posted September 10, 2014 Posted September 10, 2014 (edited) DCS F-35 A /B/C Module Supporter Hi all, Wow......someone has gone and made a F-35 home cockpit............. *** Internet Reference:- http://www.flightsim.com/vbfs/showthread.php?263009-F-35-Simulator Also these found online........................ WoW! :thumbup: Honestly, why cant we have a DCS F-35 ABC variant using a EFM like JBSIM FM + AFM Tool:- http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/ Or why not develop an ED-DCS SSM FM + AFM as per this link:- http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2039947&postcount=1 I mean watch................. More info here..................... http://viperwing.com/#F-35-simulator-cockpit Then build a nice high quality 3D Full Click-able cockpit 6DOF and model like Dino Catteano's TACPAC Version....... http://indiafoxtecho.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/f-35-lightning-ii-version-230-limited.html Modern Fighters! Awesome ............ :thumbup: Many seem to want this going by online discussions, why is it FSX gets everything when the "FSX Source Code" itself has reached "End of Product Life", going by developer online discussions. I dont get it! Instead we get all this WW1 and WW2 out of place air craft that fit what concept exactly? I mean whats next........ "Star Trek Ships" - http://reggiestake.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/star-trek-the-ships-of-starfleet-command.jpg C'mon, Please guys! Lets get back into "Air War Combat Simulation Development + Commercial Aviation a concept that fits better into "Modern Aviation Simulations" for goodness grief! :doh: Following a proper air craft training pipeline for example:- http://i1171.photobucket.com/albums/r543/picturebucket7/FFOSP/How-to-become-a-fighter-pilot-Infographic_zps58102d5d.jpeg Starting with a basic flight training Cessna like this:- http://i1171.photobucket.com/albums/r543/picturebucket7/FFOSP/USAF%20Academy%20Cessna%20R172E_zpsxgoqdzky.jpg Seriously ED-DCS is missing out on bucket loads of ............. "$$$$COIN$$$$$"............ I mean look at that awesome home pit screeny...........WoW.......... Yeah! C'mon enough already, this has just become ridiculous why cant someone just develop the F-35 A B C, gee if Dino Catteano can, surely ED-DCS! Well we hope for a DCS F-35 ABC and F-16C Block 50/52 + F-18E + Global MAP with Theaters and dynamics Campaigns! Cheers, Edited November 9, 2015 by WRAITH
SkateZilla Posted September 10, 2014 Posted September 10, 2014 (edited) Search Function, We had a Team developing it, and it didn't work out. Way to revive a thread nearly a year after it went silent. Edited September 10, 2014 by SkateZilla Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
PLAAF Posted July 21, 2015 Posted July 21, 2015 Hope it is the Australian version :) My Adorable Communist Errand Girls Led by me, the Communist Errand Panda
Shaman Posted July 21, 2015 Posted July 21, 2015 Voted NO, I'd rather see realistic F-16C. 51PVO Founding member (DEC2007-) 100KIAP Founding member (DEC2018-) :: Shaman aka [100☭] Shamansky tail# 44 or 444 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 100KIAP Regiment Early Warning & Control officer
WHOGX5 Posted July 21, 2015 Posted July 21, 2015 Would I like to see a F-35 in DCS? Yes. Would I rather see a F-16 in DCS? Yes. -Col. Russ Everts opinion on surface-to-air missiles: "It makes you feel a little better if it's coming for one of your buddies. However, if it's coming for you, it doesn't make you feel too good, but it does rearrange your priorities." DCS Wishlist: MC-130E Combat Talon | F/A-18F Lot 26 | HH-60G Pave Hawk | E-2 Hawkeye/C-2 Greyhound | EA-6A/B Prowler | J-35F2/J Draken | RA-5C Vigilante
Recommended Posts