All Activity

The 18.1 deg/s tested in DCS is for 14,862 kg. As for 20 degree/s, I don’t know. It is never stated. I have found multiple charts in manuals showing 20 deg/s but they never say the weight or configuration. But I imagine it’s likely 550 kg-50% fuel and 2x R-27 + 2x R-73. This one is from a “study guide” for pilots that goes through details of the structure. Okay, maybe it’s 19.5 deg/s

Hello this has been discussed a lot, our implementation is based on data and SME feedback over the years. The pylon use is optional however for mission designers. We will not be changing the HARM setup thank you

Да именно так. Виртуальной рукой не получается взять за рычаг. РППУ берется без проблем, интерактивность тоже на высшем уровне, а рычаг, после одного из обновлений перестал браться.

Hello, There is information going around that the F-16C Viper cannot use HARM missiles from inner pilons. The ones that carry external wing fuel tanks. IRL it can carry HARMs, they can be successfully mounted, but cannot be used as it is not intended to be used with those pylons. That leaves Viper with only 2 possible HARMs instead of 4. Can anyone confirm if that is the case and will ED remove 4 HARMs load out if it is not realistic? Best regards.

Hi, please check what we have said again, we do not make promises but we do share our plans, we are working on improvements for the updater and disk space which is a concern for everyone. As mentioned previously we rolled back the changes to rethink our strategy, this was after getting considerable feedback from the community. Once we are ready to implement a better system we will let you all know. thank you

@celestHawk Thank you for speaking out! I do agree with many of the points you make. Presumably, the silent majority simply accepts DCS as-is or – worse for us who stick around – simply drops DCS. Without a constant influx of new players/simmers, DCS will eventually die out for lack of funding. I'd love to see ED's statistics on retention of new users. Having started DCS two years ago, I can attest to the onboarding experience being subpar compared to other games/sims around. Without the community content, I would have been lost even more. But, as you pointed out, there's nothing like DCS, which is the only reason I stuck with it. DCS' bugs and issues puzzled me. I come from ArmA 1 thru 3 and DCS seemed like a noticeable step backwards in terms of documentation, scripting, and stability. The updater is archaic. ED promised background updates about a year ago but they never materialized. It should continue interrupted updates and also recognize insufficient disk space, though. Never had an issue with that. @Rudel_chw You are a decade-long, die-hard DCS fan. You are entitled to your opinion. However, sarcastically telling disagreeing users to just "bugger off" is against everyone's interest. DCS needs to retain and grow its user base to keep its business afloat. If a superior competitor ever comes around it may flip the switch on DCS. Having started DCS two years ago and having a software development background, I'm still unpleasantly surprised by its multitude of bugs and issues. While ED do solicit feedback and bug reports, I feel like the effort is in vain if such posts do not get acknowledged officially. In case you'd like to know more about my – certainly incomplete – technical assessment and suggestions for the DCS core, feel free to read this. No feedback from ED about it, just like several core bug reports, I've recently posted, which is frustrating. Also nothing new on the net.dostring_in() issue. An 8+ CVSS security vulnerability simply sitting around despite a mitigation being available. There's certainly room for improvement.

Not that I am aware of, but I will try to find out. thanks

Hello @Nightstorm, is there an option you can update it for the new sniperpod? The MFD doesn't show the information next to the OSB's on the MFD on the TGP page. Thank you! This is the best and only MOD I use in VR.

Thank you @LetMePickThat for checking in and adding key details. Thank you @HFXLegion for all your hard work. Do appreciate some simplification as I was confused between the ME and MC so I used... both in an upcoming project.

I understand your frustration, your recent post in the bugs section has maybe sent you over the edge. I think you forget that without Eagle Dynamics none of the community projects would be possible. Our team and the work we do can be seen in our change logs, with well over 16 years of production, and working with the community, to claim we do not care because we can not grant every wish is just silly. I wish you all the best and hope that you will continue to enjoy DCS. best regards Bignewy

By the way. If you like to compare different VR headsets, ChatGPT can do an amazing job in collecting and comparing the specs and summerize user reports. It also is able to explain the features quite accurate.

hi, that's great, which version of SSA?

No problem, If you need to you can contact our support directly however they will give you the same advice. I wish you good luck.

In which directory? The same one you run your DCS.exe from? Ever used NVPI or Nvidia App to override the DLSS dll, and haven't reverted it back to using the default? Note, I haven't checked in the in game overlay yet myself, just a couple of items that could potentially cause this.

thank you we have reported this issue to the team.

Never had such issue, I can stop the download and resume it from the last byte everytime I need to. It's not possible to rewrite a multiple GB file (.surface5) while it's in use whithout exhausting system resources. Launch the download at night and don't play other games while doing software updates of any kind, CPU/RAM/MB have I/O limits, this user behaviour could lead to data corruption. Agree. Partially agree, they should make hyper-HQ AI units textures (skins) as an optional download, but cockpits textures need high resolution in order to see the labels clearly.

Yes, please, this is a major thing missing in most DCS aircraft

I can confirm that the Q3 has an outstanding sweet spot. You can literaly look with your eyes at the edge of the lenses and see clear. The Q3 is a great headset. The field of view is an important part, since it defines how much of the vr world you can see. The Q3 has 110° which is a good average. The Reverb G2 ha 98° and Pimax Super has 120°. You can think of it like a diving mask which gives you kind of a tunnel vision. The wider the FOV the greater the immersion. One of the main reasons I chose the Q3.

Not to mention X-101 is twice the size of the Harpoon.

I really like this patch, it looks great.

No. Explained in OP:

Пуля — дура, смекалка — молодец. В остальном, относимся с пониманием За ценные замечания - Благодарю. Принял к сведению. Учту на будущее " Не все же должны думают как автор. Я, конечно, не Гугл-карты, но пробую угадывать. Как говорил наш историк ещё в далёкой школе, электрик - товарищ Фёдор: - Где находится рюмочная знаешь ? Садись 4 "

It's not a good reason to stop sim development. There are multiple examples even from FC level aircraft: MiG-29 can't extend speedbrakes with center bag (real limitation) or F-15C engines flame out after 10s of inverted flight (real limitation) and yes, there were multiple reports on this, yet the devs didn't remove the features because it's not about players' convenience or bug report readers. It's about simulation.

I cant seem to get 310.4.0 to show in-game. Still showing 310.3.0 (preset K) for some reason.... (I simply overwrote the nvngx_dlss.dll file with the latest 310.4.0)

I think it would be a good idea for Heatblur to partner with Reflected to enchance and fix their F14 campaigns. I think their staff seems to be too busy actually working on the planes to upkeep the missions.