All Activity

Да. Конечно. Естественно. Но зачем тогда городили огород с бланкированием и со стороны СПО и со стороны РЛС? Так считает и блок-схема Н019АЭ из польской библиотеки, гриф снят. Там какая-то логика его получения, перед выдачей есть кеширование сигнала в 1 бит. Выдача по аналоговой ВЧ линии. За встречу и обработку в СПО отвечает целая одна из кассет.

Каждый тянет одеяло на себя , )) в жизни все сложнее . Заводчане ( не все ) думают что их самолет прилетит в полк и будет штыком , полковые думают что завод испортил хороший самолет )). Конечно не те , не те не правы. Само собой, если завод освоил ремонт, то делает его по максимуму, но бывают ситуации, когда какой то косячок всплывает в последний момент или отказ плавающий , то он есть , то нет ,а времени на исправление нет , сроки, звонки , давление начальства с двух сторон. И заявки на перегонку уже поданы . К тому же не все все пункты вводятся в программу облета , прицел , к примеру проверяется только через ВСК , никто контрольные цели поднимать не будет ). И тогда либо договорняк через начальников заводских и полковых и тогда приказ летчику не еб-ть никому мозги а подписывать акт и перегонять самолет либо инженер берет литр массандры и договаривается на месте ))) . Возможны и другие варианты. Но как правило все проходит хорошо, в пределах руководящих документов . Но ВСЕГДА , когда самолет приходит с завода , начинают вылазить какие то косяки и инженеры с техниками еще долго с ним колупаются , что то крутят , настраивают СН, САУ и тд ( особенно это касалось прицелов ) , прежде чем самолет через несколько месяцев станет действительно штыком и начнет летать как надо . Бывают конечно исключения , но редко .

Funny you say that because I was disappointed recently watching new MiG-29A external lights in VR. They were not really bright to start with and basically disappeared over 200m. So it's additional problem with DCS not being consistent between VR and 2D, and probably depends also on some graphics settings which should be avoided.

this has been reported internally. thank you

Just an update on this issue, it occurs because tracking status switches between valid and invalid state, when invalid missile symbol shows only azimuth.

the team is investigating, if you have short track replays please attach them thank you

The MiG-29 allows you to do this, unlike the Su-27

thank you for the report.

Hi, this is a known issue and the team have a report internally. best regards bignewy

Hi, I've opened the game twice today and everything seems to be going well. As I said, it's intermittent, sometimes working and sometimes not. Best regards and thanks. Anyway, here's my log for today. dcs.log

Hi, something similar is happening to me since the last update.

I'm staying low and try to acquire enemy visually, then once he's on top of me I'm climbing to get on his six and shoot some R-73s or lock him with radar close combat mode to use R-27Rs. Same tactics that I've used in MIG-21. For BVR I identify my enemy first (via AWACS). If it is a modern jet like F-16 I just don't bother fighting him with this technique, because MIG-29s chances of survival are slim to none. But harassing some ground pounders or older/equivalent planes? That can be done. /edit not AWACS but GCI on multiplayer servers.

А еще - если у кого-то, как у меня, никак не получается добиться звенящей резкости картинки, проверьте зрение. Я вот сходил. Оказалось, что на правом глазу все ок, а в от на левом - минус 1. Соответственно, все, что я видел левым глазом, давало неслабое мыло. При том, что в обычной жизни я этого не ощущаю совершенно. Взял рецепт, буду делать линзы для шлема, надеюсь на резкое улучшение качества картинки малой кровью

Hi guys I wanted to know more about the new Mig-29A so I just signed up for the forum. I used Mig-29 FC3 module before, and I liked close combat by using HMS. I looked at the new Mig-29A, and it seems there are some differences in how radar and HMS system works. Below is what I learned about each module, and can anyone tell me if I'm missing something, or wrong about something? 1. Mig-29 FC3 module BVR There are radar modes(scan, TWS) for bvr, and IRST for bvr. When they lock a target, they change to STT mode. Once STT mode is active, IRST lock can be changed to radar lock, but not vice versa. I can fire missiles at this point. 2. New Mig-29 modules BVR Basically same with FC3, but more switches and procedures. 3. Mig-29 FC3 module WVR There are radar close combat mode(Vertical scan), and IRST close combat modes(HMS, Vertical scan, Bore). HMS only uses IRST, and has no way to begin with radar. However, all modes including HMS modes change to STT mode when the target is locked. Once STT mode is active, IRST lock can be changed to radar lock, but no vice versa. I can fire missiles at this point. 4. New Mig-29 modules WVR Basically same with FC3, but HMS can start with radar?

im flying 160 - 180 without any issues. Im Trimming with the Force Trim

Does it work with flat screens? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Pretty sure we'll get both FF Su-25 and FF Su-27 if the MiG-29 sells well. So, do your part everyone! I truly wish we could get more Cold War aircraft. Oh, ok and BTW. You can add the F-8 to your list I suppose. Even if it hasn't been officially announced yet. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

After some test, I can say that the bug is still exist. Place an EWR, in SP works fine...in MP dosen't. As my post here:

And save with RAlt + Num0. [emoji6] @Furiz No point in reinstallations. Perform a full repair. Same thing, only quicker. It won't touch Saved Games though. To my knowledge. You have to have snapviews save enabled, and you must save a snapview before the file gets populated. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Nothing. I did enjoy that helicopter SAR server, and I dable into other servers from time to time. Not at all interested in joining any squads, because I fly whenever I feel like it, without constraints and commitments. MP can be lots of fun. My first experiences were EF2K, some DI and Janes games over Kali, before IP was widely supported. Yeah, and FPSs like Doom, Descent, Nukem 3D, some Starwars etc. But that was way back in the 90s. There was a warbirds game that supported IP and only MP. The name escapes me, and was subscription based, so I gave that up very quickly. After the 90s I was a console user for 10+ years, and played a lot of MP with my X. But we had multiple TVs and consoles. Spent countless hours in MP on some PS3 game pleasing her I can't remember. Some FPS something. I have nothing against MP, and I will probably eventually come back to it. But I have too much fun learning all the modules in SP. [emoji4] Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I agree but it's not that simple to just throw some model there. Every soldier is expected to have his own hit box/DM (if you kill the crew the unit is not dead but is not active either and it changes the gameplay) and IR layer. Its placement may collide with rotation or elevation of the unit/gun unless smartly connected. Anyway I support.

F1M?

Σας καλωσορίζουμε στο δεύτερο φροντιστήριο για το FA-18C Hornet που πραγματεύεται τις δυνατότητες πλοήγησης του αεροσκάφους. Το παρόν video παρέχει συμβουλές ΑΠΟΚΛΕΙΣΤΙΚΑ για εικονικές πτήσεις!

Προστέθηκε 4ο tutorial για το Mirage

Damn, where'd you get this? Can we have it? Damn, where'd you get this? Can we have it?