All Activity

Maybe this will be helpful to someone. I was experiencing crazy VR issues with only the CH-47F module. But I finally found a fix. Basically, all other modules would perform consistently around 45fps in VR. Roughly 100-120fps without VR. The Chinook performed well outside of VR, but in VR it would drop to only 3-5 fps. When I went back to another module...magically back to the usual roughly 45fps. Very frustrating! First try was the log analyzer in Discord, but no luck. It showed everything was green and good to go. Tweaked settings to see if it would improve, but nothing helped. I stumbled upon a YT video from Spud Spike that solved this for me. The issue appears to be the efficiency cores in the Intel i9-14900 processor. Using the steps in the video to disable the E-cores brought the CH-47F VR up to roughly 45fps. The change did not improve the performance of any other modules. Just the Chionook. I think that means that the module, at least in its current state, just uses more CPU than the other modules. And, if you happen to have one of these processors with E-cores, they just can't handle the load. The work needs to be done on a P-core. Anyway, I'm glad I was able to fix this, and maybe this will be helpful to others having VR performance issues with the CH-47F. If you have an Intel processor that uses E-cores, try disabling them when DCS is running. Link: Spud Spike Video

Shut the canopy. Or enable helmet in the audio options. Or both. I don’t know what to tell you. Aircraft are loud. More seriously, check the „world“ audio gain. Generally speaking the environmental audio gain is pretty high in DCS (also applies to the F2 view e.g.)

I am unable to use the F7 key to load the troops. Other keys in menu are functional, and keyboard checks out ok.

ОТкрою вам наверное военную тайну. Иногда у самолёта прям на заводе на той же самой приёмке (и даже самими работниками завода) выявляются дефекты. Но его всё равно принимают, если он способен вообще безопасно лететь конечно. И это не просто из за раздолбайства принимающего или сдающего. На это есть причины. Никто ничего не получает! Для этого есть внутренние документы на которые они ссылаются. Ну конечно если будет ЧП, то возможно прокурор и скажет "А вот в РЛЭ так написано, вы нарушили". В случае со взлётом - это делается что бы поднять нос раньше чем воздухозаборники откроются и камней с полосы не нахватать. А вот если ты камней нахватаешь - то виноват будет опять же лётчик и никакое РЛЭ его тут уже не спасёт. ПО этому лучше заранее и контролируемо поднять стойку без всяких рисков, чем камней поймать. И на той же посадке проще на 300 выравнивание начать и плавно подойти к земле ( путсь даже с небольшим перелётом). Чем на 280 провалиться и ушатать самолёт о бетон. ВЫ вот сами попробуйте в DCS снижаться 3-5 ментров в секунду и на скорости 280 выравнивание с выдерживанием сделать.

There is no difference. I understanding framing it in the inverse feels negative; however, this is a direct reaction of the recent Enigma video and a call for clarification. The things I have listed are the things that I believe many people thought were an assumed baseline given, not a wishlist. I do think clarification is warranted because for people interested in DCS for the gameplay aspect, hearing that the helicopters, maps, and WWII content I have purchased may not even be compatible with the dynamic campaign at launch, maybe "someday" is disconcerting if you have played DCS as long as I have. Someday can be a very distant day indeed, and purchasing decisions/platform investment are predicated on clear communication from the team and trust from the playerbase that they are spending significant amounts of money with the correct expectation.

И получают "предпосылку" на разборе...

ДА!) С мануалами по кликабельному МиГу) Кстати да! РЛЭ совсем не закон. И от него в полках например часто отклоняются. Например в РЛЭ написано при заходе на посадку выравнивание делать на 280, касание на 250-260. В полках так никто не делает, выравнивание минимум на 300! Так же написано на взлёте переднюю стойку поднимать на 230-240(или около того). По факту поднимают на 180-190, а в Кущевке например вообще на 150 курсанты поднимают. Так что РЛЭ, это тот же самый забор, который воспринимают как рекомендацию, но не закон)

That's what I thought too, but the trim is isolated from the elevator axis. So, with the trim being backwards, I had to invert the elevator axis in Moza, and that made the trim and elevator work in the same direction. However, as expected, things were now backwards in DCS, and pulling the elevator sitck back would result in a nose dive, so that's why I had to invert yet again, but this time in the DCS control settings for the F4U. So yeah, inverting the inversion kept the elevator behavior the same, but it didn't affect the trim, which now follows the same direction as the elevator. None of this will affect my other modules because I use separate Moza profiles for each aircraft. Cheers, -GT-

A Dynamic Campaign A Save System and a reliable Replay System. I’ll believe this when I see it each one of those is 6-8 years work at the ED pace of development. Plenty of games have these features without spending a decade to develop them or needing such elaborate justification to include them.

Просьба закрыть тему. Продано.

ВОзможно некотрые борта (например как выше у Стрижей) откапиталенные, или где то в закромах нашли запасной ИП-52) Кстати им относительно недавно передавали борт, который почти всю жизнь "на приколе" стоял, и у него налёт был всего 300 часов. Так что на нём возможно ещё и зелёная индикация)

Конечно, если есть время, я думаю подписчиков у вас будет вагон! Вам огромный респект за обратную связь!

Still not fixed

TurAF - Panterler

Годнота, однако. Видны небольшие колебания рыскания, правда.

you may want to try to run the RAM with no XMP. i hear this tip said a lot in these forums. i personally have XMP and have no issues.

Yep I've noticed that the vessel for the player to to take off are not advancing. I'm just not quite sure if INU will work if the taking off from smaller vessel as they are not that stationary (shakes given the effects of the tide).

@BIGNEWY Is this reported?

Found out you can also set up payloads in the mission editor and edit those lua files to add the fusing options you want. You can then pick them in MP servers as well.

Статик пресеты.

Will we ever see the Kiowa on sale?

Я удалил конфиг SnapViews . Игра создала новый и все.

I've create support ticket # 195010 and ED suggests that I post in the forum. No idea if it's being tracked though. Eagle Dynamics IT Team 09/27/2025 07:17:01 Quote Hello, thank you for your message to DCS World support. Thank you for reporting this. Since this is related to a stock mission, we recommend posting the details on our official forum. There, mission designers and community members can review the issue and provide feedback or fixes. -- Best regards, Eagle Dynamics IT Team PS: The ticket is currently in support state instead of closed. Sorry that I've misinterpreted the red balloon icon on the ticket

Let’s get it into a usable place first before we look at other options.

After engines startup when I turn on AFCS (SAU) switch, all green lights on autopilot buttons start to blink and nothing happens. I don't touch the stick (FFBeast), I even turned it off in, turned off axis bindings. On the startup tutorials videos of other people I see only damper button light starts blinking and stick moves on its own during test. Nothing happens in my case, no matter how long I wait. I cannot even finish the built in training tutorial.