All Activity

what controls do u have mapped for autopilot, ap disconnet, stabillizer....? its confusing.

If I had to guess, they kept the same FM, but altered the stick limiter behavior, and behavior after critical AoA is reached. No more wing rocking at stall, which I thought felt like scripted behavior.

I have noticed that the AIM-9s tend to have intermittent growling during maneuvers. It appears that this happens if you roll the F-4 relative to the target. In the first track, you will notice that despite the AIM-9J being uncaged, it will still lose lock when the F-4 is maneuvered. The other track shows the AIM-9J losing lock if the target is flying straight and the F-4 rolls side to side, implying the lock stability is a function of bank angle relative to the target. I believe this is the case for the AIM-9B and AIM-9M, but I have yet to test them. I will attach tracks for other AIM-9 versions when I find time. Please let me know if there are other tests I should perform. Thanks! AIM-9J intermittent lock.trk AIM-9J intermittent lock-non-maneuvering target.trk

I’ve been flying the FC3 version of the Mig29 as my primary plane for the last few months. It’s always been a fun plane for just messing about in aerobatic flight, and generally felt great to fly. It had its idiosyncrasies, that for the most part, simply made it feel unique and rewarding to master. For example, engines that can blast through the trimmed speed and send you off like a rocket before you can feed in more nose-down trim. Or the “AoA squat” and feeling how it digs, plows, and mush through the air during low speed turns. Love it!!! The only thing I didn’t like about the FC3 version was the dynamics at the edge of the envelope, specifically during stall break, where the wings sharply rolled hard left and right (also in a way that seemed unexpectedly violent given how much it generally likes to mush through the air), and unloading the wings wasn’t really able to make it recover. Sure the stick limiter is there to protect against stalls, but that’s no fun :). Also, because the stick limiter was annoying in how it cyclicly pulsed the stick forward at a set rate, making the nose bob up and down in an annoying manner. Imagine my surprise when I did not buy the FF Mig29A, but yet, my FC3 version has been cured of all its nasty habits!!!! The FC3 version feels absolutely fantastic now at edge of the envelope! It not longer has a hard stall break, but rather progressively mushes, adding power tends to increase AoA until you’re basically vertical at zero airspeed like a hornet! Also I noticed the stick pusher behavior is much more subtle, only kicking in when you’re it’s really high AoA, and it does not do so in a predetermined pulsing pattern! Honestly flies so nice now, that it almost feels like I stole it something from the guys that paid for the FF version I held off on buying the FF version out of fear that the graphical demands would be excessively increased (like the F-5 remaster). But it sounds like it’s comparable to the hornet base on comments here. So maybe I will buy it just so I don’t feel guilty flying around the new and improved FC3 version lol.

So, I suppose someone with necessary documents should make a bug report stating that SPO-15 should work properly even when the radar is on?

I've already used it. It behaves as you described. I don't like the flickering, so DLSS at a higher level might be a better alternative. If only I could activate the K preset.

Awesome work! I'm curious; do you do these performance calculations through interpolated empirical data (graphs and tables from the manual) or is it done using flight mechanics and equations of motion?

Thanks! Apologies for not catching it! -Ryan

I agree with this. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

+1

Many users have reported getting kicked out of the game lately. I'm sure you're right it's probably the connection, but still. ED needs better grace periods. One user has to go offline all the time to not get kicked out when he edits missions. That's not how it's supposed to work. And it doesn't happen with other games. Have only happened to me once, when I was logged in the game during a planned maintenance. @TOViper Several users have complained lately. I'm sure it's the protection system, and suddenly the connection is "broken" for a few seconds, and it doesn't remediate by itself, when the connection is back online. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

It says preset C, and I don't know how to get the K setting right. I've tried various settings in the driver (see image). It just doesn't overwrite! The autoexec.cfg is a normal TXT file with a .cfg extension, right (It should be normal for a CFG file to appear as a TXT file (type)? Should I try another tool like DLSS Inspector? For example, the log file contains the following (I'm surprised it mentions DX11 and not DX12): 2025-09-19 19:10:13.208 INFO DX11BACKEND (300): Use DLSS preset 'C'

Trying to make a video comparing both cockpits side-by-side. However, the scale and some arrangement of the panels are so different. I tried half-day but can't really align them, when I got the HUD right, but the top mirror was way off. Even the landing gear handle is slightly different. Then if you turn the view, there is no way to put them side-by-side and not get confused. It is way different from the F-5E Reworked. Wow.

Спасибо, пытался, при этом почему-то она виснет ещё до того, как начнёт РУС перемещать. Да и вообще, как-то зоны по осям крутить костыльно, надо опция для ффб джойстиков отключать это прерывание.

yeah, I‘m aware. But either way, the only way to fight misinformation is with proper facts.

Это не БПРМ и ДПРМ. Это не привода АРК. Это система ПРМГ https://www.avsim.su/wiki/ПРМГ

Six maps were updated this time. If every one of those maps are installed. Obviously the update is gonna be huge. Imagine if Normandy 2.0 also was updated this time. [emoji4] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Сев в 29 заметил такую особенность, что настройка принудительного межзрачкового расстояния для VR работает не совсем корректно. Так для себя выяснил, что максимально точно размер сцены получается при 40мм в моем случае (если увеличивать, то размеры предметов уменьшаются). Но при таком МЗР щиток шлема сдвигается влево, это становится видно по вырезу в нем под кислородную маску. А вот при МЗР 60 мм этот вырез по центру. Видимо отсчет координат МЗР идет не от центра между виртуальными глазами, а от правого глаза.. П.С: гарнитура HP Reverb2

Myth. F-X program was active before mig-25 and had solidified the requirements that would end up becoming the F-15 without it even being considered the primary threat by US intelligence. Su-17 was.

You have to reverse the axis in the Moza software. Us MS SW FFB2 users have to swap axis for every module in the DCS FFB tuning settings. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Reports claims this is solved now. [emoji1303] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

I am going to play around with the Iowa mods to see if I can get them to fire KT shells

Ещё вопрос по теме березы. Она все время орет о захвате, когда, по крайней мере бот, летит чуть позади в миссиях. То есть от него. Недоработка?

i can confirm SARH missiles are having this problem - i've seen it half a dozen times (or so) unfortunately, it doesn't happen with *every* shot but i've seen AI shoot an R-27, then turn away - target is off gimbals and the SARH missile continues to guide no audible or visual indications on the target a/c's RWR i rarely visit the ED forums anymore but i wanted to check to see if this SARH problem still exists after the recent patch (mid-Sep 2025) devs, any chance you can look into this? and no, i don't have track files or youtubes or tacview files ---- i'm telling you, this exists thank you