All Activity

lol, oh ya, forgot about that one... have also run into that, usually trying to refuel/rearm somewhere mid-mission.

It was the AGM-88D that got upgraded to have GPS and ability to engage targets after turning off their radar - not our AGM-88C Just tested in POS/EOM just toggle launch too - ripple them all within a few seconds and then turn off the emitters - still precise hits from 35+nm

@-Scrat- I'm on it. I'll publish here the list of all affected aircraft and make separate reports for devs (some modules seems to be OK: A-10C, F-16C, AH-64, AJS37...).

Well that should certainly be fixed if it’s broken, then the graphic overlay wouldn’t be needed. It looks visible enough here although this was two years ago

Ah, haha! Got it! [emoji1] [emoji1303] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Thats seemingly good news? Would be quite annoying just spammed AMRAAMS on some over performing mechanic.

Track?

You guys went off topic here

Yes, all good. It could be exactely as you said. But do you really think the statement means "There is an agreement but our part was to pay what we didn't do yet but we hope to be able to pay soon"? Because i think the statement means "There is an agreement signed but both have to follow the conditions to implement it but this is not the case yet but we are hoping to implement it as soon as both parties are fullfilling their parts on the agreement". Further more NL also wrote that "We are acting in good faith on the agreement". But anyway.... the only fact we really know is that there was an agreement signed by both parties but it's still not implementet. Everything else is nothing more than speculations and interpretations.

Has the conditions under which the pilot seat is able to fire on a FCR acquired target changed? I don't seem to be able to fire a radar guided missile on a FCR acquired target any longer.

Всем привет! Возможно ли редактирование миссий из платных компаний? Нужно чисто для ознакомления, чтобы посмотреть, как это сделано, особенно триггеры

Has anyone been having issues with the IJA assets? So far I've noticed two things: 1. The Type 89 can put 50 rounds into the side of a Sherman and the Sherman takes 0 damage. 2. Hits on the IJA vehicles are registered in debrief but kills are not.

Others have run into this problem before. There's another recent thread floating around on it but can't find it. There is also a VR specific problem where the opposite happens, where opening F10 leads to the lighting going way too bright for a while. It appears to be HDR misfiring at a guess. Not the type of HDR found in monitors or in the system settings etc, it's the lighting technique used in gaming to brighten/darken scenes as you transition between light/dark areas. The kind of adaptive lighting/gamma system they have has always had some odd quirks imo, I wish we could disable it in the options.

Hi, please include a track replay example so we can check it. Also please check your bindings for double inputs. thank you

If you think you have public evidence that some thing is wrong please DM us about the ALR-56M, we hare happy to look at it. So far we have not seen any convincing evidence. We can not take peoples word that "something is wrong" so please if you have evidence shoot us a message. thank you

It's not, however, that's the point. Needles in pneumatic flight instruments don't shake, vintage or modern, doesn't matter, physics is the same. Whether the gauge has diaphragm or bourdon tube inside, the air filters out small pressure irregularities quite well. Granted, entire insrument panel shaking from engine vibrations or stall may induce wobble indeed (after all, panels were usually mounted on rubber dampers, not bolted stiff to the fuselage), but not to the scale present in current module version. Mech-driven instruments, like engine tachos - sure, depending on how they're driven exactly they can be a bit more shaky than pneumo ones. I'd say if Corsair module needle animation is here to stay, it should at least be toned down. Apart from th vids above, here are a couple of warbird examples showing how much wobble one can expect in various phases of flight:

Hi everybody, First sorry for my broken english. Since yesterday I can't fly no more the A10CII. since I take off or even starting in flight the plane pitch up and i must strongly push to stabilize. One way I tried is to put fly control on reverse on the left console. That's not a sustainable solution. It was working fine before and I flew many hours before. Any Idea ? Thanks

Okay, here ya go: “Public Court System”

I’m not asking for daily transcripts or drama. Just a minimum level of clarity and honesty from a company that continues to sell modules and build its reputation on trust. Silence may avoid short-term noise, but long-term uncertainty erodes confidence... especially when paying customers are the ones left with broken promises. A simple, honest update like “We’re limited by X, and here’s what we can or can’t do right now” would go a long way. That’s not unreasonable... it’s basic respect.

First, at this point everything you are all debating is just noise. What is ED's plan to keep this from happening going forward? What is their way to fix it for their customers now that it has happened? I have three Razbam modules that are already degrading in terms of functionality, have never received promised features, and it sounds like they'll stop working soon. How is ED going to fix this? Refunds? I'm not interested in "store credits", if that is the solution. I already own the modules I want. Second, what should my expectation be in regards to 3rd parties? The modules I purchase could just stop receiving support at any time? Polychop had some well-publicized issues right after the release of the Kiowa... another reminder of how "fragile" ED's current business model is. Which brings me to the third point: Is there any belief that this business model is sustainable? It takes years, sometimes 7 or 8 years, for these modules to be developed and released between actual development time and time spent in "early access". Does ED believe it is a sound business model to have to maintain an ever-growing portfolio of modules with no revenue stream beyond their initial purchase? Over time, it would become an exponential amount of work to maintain these modules while developing the core game, with the only source of revenue being new "early access" releases that take years to develop. I believe that is why the CH-47 was released in such a bare-bones state, has seen such slow progress, etc. I think the model is bad, and if not already in trouble, eventually will be in trouble without some ongoing source of revenue to sustain the existing modules, terrains, and core game (subscription?). I know it isn't a popular view, but it is real.

I'd love to see voice command added too but the fewer AI GIBs we have the easier it will be

Something that should exist

Suggest you google the definitions of Litigation. It's the Legal Process or resolving right's disputes. It does not always goto court. Both parties meet, with a legal representative from a legal firm. Most of the time Companies resolve their disputes in a conference room w/ a legal mediator. Or in modern / post covid times, on Teams/Skype/Video Conferencing Apps w/ Both Parties + the Legal Mediator w/ digital transcripts created for each session etc etc. If both parties were too busy shooting shots at each other over discord and social media and newsletters, nothing would be salvageable. there wouldn't bee any progress. ED being silent helps more than you know, they simply release updates stating as much. What do you want them to do? release a newsletter and have them post PDF transcripts of any conferencing sessions and attendence logs showing who doesn't show up and who does, who buys the krispy kremes and who buys the starbucks.?

POKER and CHAOS are not in the same group, causing POKER to be a green icon on the HDS and not a blue icon as a member of the player flight. POKER is correctly setup, but CHAOS has the same callsign as POKER, but a different group name.

Sure, discretion matters... but silence from ED and broken promises still affect us directly. Customers aren’t bound by NDAs, but we are paying for the consequences. When one side goes silent and the other speaks out, even messily, it’s often the only way the public gets any sense of what’s happening. That’s not ideal, but neither is being left completely in the dark.