All Activity

Yeah really. I mean I knew that the map wasn't finished when I bought the whole thing though, and was kinda confused at first too. But I got the whole map so I'll have to wait for the rest to show up, and any improvements.

No worries chap, happy to help.

I could not get the voice warning to work until I stopped using Vaicom. However, there is a new update to Vaicom just released that now recognizes the MiG-29. Hopefully that will fix this issue.

Things like this shouldn't be module specific imho. They should be rolled out for every AC similar to the canopy rain effects. That said, i agree it would be a very immersive feature.

Canopy icing is modelled in the 3d model.

That would be very nice to have indeed. I wonder though if PAR would make even more sense. I think in a military context these systems were also available as mobile units. They would also allow AC without ILS to do IFR approaches. Would only need a bit more work to implement unfortunately...

Странно, почему в те времена, не втыкали две радиостанции, со шкалами ввода частот и предустановленными каналами? Это обычная практика или боялись инцидентов а-ля МиГ-25 беленко?

Copy. Thank you very much!

In RWS and TWS modes TDC/ target bullseye position on radar page always follows TDC instead of showing BE position of L&S target when you have one like it used to do before the MSI patch. Radar BE position bug.trk

On the latest patch, if you use the Default cockpit in the special options (Cyrillic cockpit) with Metric as your units, you'll get this TAS indicator: If you use the English cockpit with Imperial units, you'll get this TAS indicator: If you use the English cockpit with Metric units, you'll get this TAS indicator:

Thanks good sir, I've updated that bomb into Splash_Damage_main.lua Recently used the script to add some resemblance of nuclearness to the mig 29

Вообще не обязательно иметь метки, пеленгатор показывает пеленг от вызывающей станции, соответственно обратный пеленг будет курсом на аэродром. Ну или если с экраном локатора, то линия будет указывать на метку от борта

Вы сильно заблуждаетесь, ИЗНАЧАЛЬНО все ОКР проводятся в строгом соответствии с ГОСТ, ОСТ, ОТТ ВВС (сейчас ещё и с "положением о создании авиационной техники") и прочей нормативной документацией и ни один л/а даже макетную комиссию не пройдёт, если будут обнаружены отклонения от требований ТТЗ и нормативной документации, "бюллетени" выпускаются только при изменении в эксплуатационной и ремонтной документации и если в процессе эксплуатации обнаружены" косяки" требующие устранения либо в "войсках" либо на предприятиях и этот порядок регламентируется опять же ГОСТ, конкретно ГОСТ РВ 15.701-2003, ЧТО КАСАЕТСЯ "мнемокадров индикации", то ОСТ который привёл в пример ОБЯЗАТЕЛЕН к выполнению всеми разработчиками, а задача ИТС состоит в том числе и в том, что бы эксплуатируемое ими оборудование соответствовало тех описанию, и если в ТУ написано "ЗЕЛЁНЫЙ" то хоть лопни, но должно быть ЗЕЛЁНЫМ", а не жёлтым из-за облупившегося лака и ленивого зам. по ИАС который ни достать не может ни организовать восстановление (многое уже к сожалению не выпускается) и "таки ДА!" мажут цапон лаком, и он О ЧУДО!!! становится нужного цвета, в том числе и зелёным, я выкладывал фото со снятой лицевой панелью ...Вот для примера мнемокадр Су-35С, сейчас и выпущенное положение "тормозных щитков" зелёным обозначается. Да, приведённый мной ОСТ как раз и был одним из тех документов в соответствии с которым разрабатывалась кабина МиГ-29 и это не просто бумажка, это ЗАКОН! обязательный для исполнения и любые отклонения попадают под определение "Нарушение условий эксплуатации".

I also tried the same way without success.

Can we get an update on one of the biggest issues with the current weather system, please? AI can still see through clouds, IR missiles can still track through clouds. None of the visually interesting cloud presets really work for singleplayer and cooperative play. WWII and modern ground attack are notoriously frustrating without clouds blocking AI's vision and weapons/sensors. Heatseekers (especially IR SAM) have an unfair advantage that flat out prevents certain scenarios to be playable in certain weather conditions. I would appreciate an update on the matter. I think it's one of the bigger long-standing issues DCS is plagued by.

It seems we still need to wait for an oficial answer.

Which "roll angle"? According to the 29G manual, there's no difference between the two down buttons. That's what they're actually called: "One UP and two DOWN" buttons.

Just a reminder - an auto-level mod for Mossie and other warbirds was posted here a few months ago. Granted, it was most likely not IC-compliant and I don't know if it worked OK in campaigns either, but for single player crowd it was better than nothing.

Apologies for the lack of updates here. The project is still alive, although work has slowed due to the real world unfortunately getting in the way. Modelling work is basically complete, we are looking for someone to join the team to help out with finessing the unwrap and doing the texture work. I’ll dump some more of the images that have been shared on our discord.

Quite the opposite here. Noticeable better loading times and switching between map and views. (Game performance was already good). I disable all mods before an update though and haven’t enabled them yet.

Thanks for sale!

It's still DDR3. The GPU that is in there is already 6 years newer than the CPU. Generally the GPU can be a decent bit newer than the CPU, but I have strong doubts that the current CPU can cope with a 1080, let alone something faster. Keep in mind that even a 4060 is over twice as fast as his current GPU. And upgrading the current platform means being limited to PCIe 2.0, so that is also going to limit the performance.

It's true that DCS content creators are becoming increasingly rare. Or maybe I'm not looking in the right place . I have lots of ideas in mind, and beautiful music to go with them, but just imagining the number of hours of work for a minute of footage made me give up before even trying. It only makes me admire the work of Adrian Carpazo even more, for example, given the quality and immersion brought to his videos like SATAC 22 or Cold War, ELI21 or DCS F4-E - First In, Last Out. I can't imagine the amount of work behind all that .

A simple way to get some weather changes is indeed very much needed, but i'm not a fan of your particular solution. Wouldn't it be more elegant to define sizes of weather patterns instead of timings? For example you define two weather presets with their own cloud, temperature, pressure and wind settings. Then you select the size of each pattern's "tile". DCS would then move those tiles around the map depending on some simplified wind speed calculations. At the tile's borders the weather parameters would be interpolated between the two tiles. Also edges would not be straight lines but more fractal to hide a tiled appearance. So this would NOT be a weather simulation, but a simplified system that allowed 2 (or more) defined weather states at different points at the same time. Moving tiles would also allow auto-generated weather forecasts without doing a lot of calculations. It would just estimated tile position at requested position based on those simplified windspeed calculations. Surely not as good as a true weather simulation, but much easier to implement and imho more immersive and interesting than a timer-based global switch between systems.

Hi, I don't know if it's an issue, butnull here is how my ASI looks like (metric, english, native, imperial setting doesn't matter). Is this correct ? Because it doesn't look like that on Wags' video. Cheers Dan