All Activity

Нет, заявлен Су-25, и скриншоты с новой кабиной опубликованы по нему же.

Help with Wingman needed... Mission 4... struggling to give Ethan order to attack the convoy... seems to not hear me... not sure what i am doing wrong... do I need to select radio 1 fisrt? in the F10 - flight -Engage menu ... which one is the right option? My target / Mission then rejoin / Ground tgts? Thks for any pointers

I've been enjoying Flaming Sunrise lately. Outstanding work, thanks for the effort. Really like the planning, etc. aspect, much more enjoyable than the scripted campaigns. I'd like to make something like this myself, when does the instruction manual come out, ha!

I’ll check, normally as no.3 you should still be inside the trigger zone. Try stopping close to 2. Or maybe ED changed the AI’s sensitivity and they stop further back now…

this mod only ADDS visual parts (and liveries) to the existing UH-60a in game. it does not modify or replace the existing model. as such, it has the same limitations, flaws and ai behavior of the standard UH-60a. With those restrictions, I cannot remove the gunner, MH-60s, doors, etc. it also means I can't fix the errors or limitations of the exiting UH-60a model's skins (ex: double texture on belly, mirrored textures on doors, etc.) I made some compromises in my liveries and the mod shapes to work around these flaws; but that's about all I could do using the existing model. As for the SOAR livery, I attempted to recreate markings on all my liveries from photos of actual aircraft (with a few modifications due to model limitations; ie aforementioned mirrored textures, etc.). That particular livery has no tail number so honestly, I don't recall what my source reference material was...

The lead won't check in with tower when following the line. To get the trigger to activate you have to taxi in between lead and two.

Для Апача можно нагуглить ТМ1-1520-251-10 или говоря в более привычной терминологии - РЛЭ. Естественно на языке оригинала.

I mean, you could, but the only scenario I see a subscription making sense is if you don't plan on staying around very long - over a long enough time (how much depending on how expensive the subscription is compared to what we have now) the perpetual will always be cheaper and offer better value for money.

Ok, now it's working. Thanks for your help. Is this the last version? VSN_F104C_EFM_Standalone_2.9.16.099

Hello Pluton I had the same problem as you my first day. You need to sync Virtual Desktop with Virtual Desktop Streamer (they are 2 different programs). You will use your Meta Username. It sounds complicated but it is not, and takes like 10 min to set-up it all up. Watch both videos below, they explain everything for you : https://youtu.be/kfoxzgGly3E?si=ZyKoxR1wJnD5NOyA Also watch this one below: https://youtu.be/kfoxzgGly3E?si=SjWpxDIiZfxZahmT

Do we have the ability to program alternative targets for the HARM in the F-16? For example, If I'm shooting at an SA-10 track radar, and the radar goes down for some reason, I'd want to have the HARM start looking for the Big Bird or Clam Shell search radars instead. I know the real AGM-88C has this capability so I'm wondering if this is modeled or not.

i did a finer look at your log and compared it mine on the left are my settings and the left are yours. the red font indicates settings you may change to improve performance. you can make a copy of your options.lua and directly edit the values using a text editor.

This is a great idea. To me it's really bad that the tool is so incomplete that most of the big servers are not using it. That's a huge wake up call to me and a waste of resources.

I am asking myself how the dev use this "debug review system"? For example, the interesting timestamp is around 10 min.... the dev saw a problem and want to review that moment..... do he watch all the 10 mins again and again? I mean.... a simple rewind function would be after all the years something great... isnt it? Not only for devs. We have also longer track replays and no rewing function is just pai.... uncool.

For gaming reasons it's even worse. But I agree, we are off topic and we should stop.

Yes, if it was for me, I wanted to say no new video yesterday because the two last ones were on friday

It wasn't a question of insufficient research, the original Leatherneck dev team simply decided to add it for gameplay reasons, just like UPK gun pods, which weren't used on real Bis either. But it's all too off-topic here and was discussed many times in -21 section of the forum, back in 2014 when module was released.

Like SilverDevil says. You will probably have better luck in the mods forum, and not in the bug section, because it is not a bug. And not even an official module. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

However, even with Virtual Desktop Streamer, when I launch dcs, the setting remains in 2D. What did I forget?

Thanks for pointing out wrong name, which can only add to suspicion on not enough research when Magnitude decided to use it. Yak-38, MiG-23, MiG-27, MiG-21PFMs and Sukhoi family aircrafts operated kh-23/kh-66 (Zvezda). But not MiG-21Bis, as radar RP-22 is based on fixed beam instead of continues wave (CW). Maybe Yugoslavia upgraded Bis on their own. But I didn't see Grom listed in Yugoslav air force manual for L-17 (Mig-21bis).