All Activity

Recruitment seem slow these days but I've been trying to start this up. https://discord.gg/Mb2ruYJ3sa

When one door opens in life, another closes.

No, it's World Scale. In commonly used VR terminology (including every other program that has this setting exposed), it's called that. IPD refers only to the actual distance between user's eyes and the corresponding physical setting on the headset.

В сторону изобретения СПО-15ЛМ Community edition? В английской ветке в хотелках есть предложение скрестить частично функциональность берёзы из FC3 с FF берёзой. С выбором по галочке в редакторе. В принципе нормальная идея. БКО для Ка-50 III же реализовали по мотивам реального, а не строго с реального.

Me and a buddy on our training server had the same issue as well - RWS mode TDC press is not locking a valid target. Valid being, a DL contact, with a brick, within rdr wlvation parameters. It seems to happen more when the radar contact is within 10 miles and coming towards you fast. Not sure if it’s a ‘thing’ but putting the cursor somewhere near the cot etc and designating seems to work?

Нет смысла гонять эти РЛЭ по кругу. На них уже посмотрели и пошли дальше

Okay, after many more game crashes, and experimenting with numerous MiG29A scenarios involving "vanilla" Nav, Nav with just NS430, Nav with just the DTC, and Nav with DTC and NS430 I can report the following: First off, as I mentioned above, if a start a different module mission such as with the Mig15, and then drop the 29A into it (no DTC/NS430), it flies perfectly. It seems that the DTC game crashes my system routinely. Not so much the NS430, but even then sometimes. If I generate a "vanilla" 29A Nav mission, things seem to work, then if I add the NS430, and then the DTC it works just fine...most of the time, but still crashes occasionally. However, if I start a mission with DTC enabled and pre-loaded , I can cold start and taxi out just fine, but every stinking time at the beginning of then T/O roll I'm sent to the Pimax Crystal Planet for time out...read game crashes to desk top. Is anyone else experiencing this issue? It really is frustrating, as I really love the MiG29A module. dcs0910-0.log dcs.log

РЛЭ Су-27СК, боевое применение МиГ-29 свидетельствуют скорее о недопиленности системы.

Ive didnt talked about promises etc. I just see when this discussion started (19 march 2023) and where we are now. I dont care about other forum parts or escpecially reputation judging from some users in other sections. Lets come back to the topic...yes, ive just asked several times about in my opinion simple task (compared to other ED tasks). I am not the only one here who is asking for it. As far as i know ED made already few pilot bodys so they do not start everytime from scratch on every module (i hope so). At least this would be a proper way of working to use let say a "skeleton model" and placing it to other modules so there only modifications on existing model. If this is not like this so this is then lets say politely "poor way of working". Thats all. ED could show even ultra early pilot body state or picture (work in progress, whatever) during this 2 years so then maybe i would try to belive that someone is working on that. Anyway. For my part everything is clear now and i will stop further asking.

Этот документ уже ссплывал и не раз. Люди выясняют должна ли РЛС вообще влиять на СПО, если все своевременно обслужено и исправно или же это хронический отказ (которые в игре не моделируются)/недопиленность системы

Congratulations Don't worry about that. In this campaign mission points only define the next mission and this is the only way to prevent the DCS campaign system giving you a new mission.

Hello pilots. I understand this module is in early access but wanted to share something with you all. I’m not entirely sure if it’s just me but in the mariana ww2 carrier in instant action I’m experiencing some major performance issues only when I look at the carrier (all other ships in the area do not kill my frames only the carrier) My CPU frame time goes nuts. Tried all graphical settings. Same effect. Now when I take off and I’m not looking at the carrier everything just plays absolutely flawless but soon as I turn and look at the carrier all hell breaks loose. I am using the eye tracking mod for psvr2. I can be facing the carrier but looking away and frames remain stable 90 but when I look directly at the carrier with my eyes it becomes a mess. Is this something that needs optimization? for what it’s worth I tried disabling the eye tracking mod but performance becomes worse in both GPU and CPU frame times.

Okay ... here it is, go figure! ... There are two Russian, PAD Single, Heliports in my mission at Sochi-Adler. They have always been in the mission since I put it together some time ago because I was trying something, they're actually redundant now. I deleted the helipads and the Su-25T radio works fine! Incidently, I dropped in an Su-27 and the radio worked with or without the helipads, it was only my original mission Su-25T radio that was affected by the helipads! My hat comes off to the mission designers who probably have to trouble shoot this stuff on a daily basis - and what worked today, might not work after the next update! How frustrating! Su-25T Airfield Strike.miz

It is Warsaw pact variant. Produced in 1989. If data is true. 9.12 for Soviet union wasn't produced after 1986. From which warehouse it came or from which undelivered contract it was held, that I do not know.

Are you aware of the M23 Armament Subsystem and UH-1H Attachments Mods? Both by the same creator, Eight Ball, and available on the DCS website. The first deletes the External Hardpoints and replaces them with the M23 system. The second does the same but also adds the troop figures to the loadout. BTW adding one of these mods and taking away the External Hardpoints also eliminates the pilot and co-pilot sights, which allows you to change the co-pilot's FOV from 20 to 60 in views.lua, and gets rid of the tunnel vision from that position.

I’m doing the field landing and carrier landing training and in both I follow directions to the “T” and the engine quits. Every time. The only gauge I see that’s abnormal is the oil (pressure I think) gauge. When the engine quits the needle is all the way down in the red. How can I fix this?

Надумал почитать РЛЭ для Су-27СК в части использования СПО-15ЛМ. Выдержек из этой доки вроде ещё никто не приводил. Так так... Читаем.. На Су-27 это тоже все толком не работает. И рекомендуется временно отключать излучение... Я просто думаю, что работает СПО при включённой своей РЛС, что не работает, а толку от её показаний ноль. И есть ли смысл тогда долбить ED схемами гашения и прочими аргументам не выключать СПО в ППС, если IRL мы будем наблюдать бесполезную цветомузыку? Кто что думает? Из документа хотя бы становится понятно, какие лампы загораются при совместной работе РЛС и СПО. И если это реализовать чисто для галочки, никто не против же будет?

Same problem here, IR mavs seem to be affected as well

Don’t quote me on this, but I thought I remembered reading somewhere that that switch was an older method. The tanks are dropped electronically like bombs (hit the arming switch for the pylon, then weapon release). In case that fails, there are two manual release pull handles located back near the wing fold handle that works as well.

I cannot reproduce this issue anymore. If you're still seeing this issue, please attach a fresh track.

@rob10 yes right wing being external is moving faster and yes the probe pass through it i noticed

Unfortunately no where right now:

any update to this? I'm just curious